Your submission at Articles for creation: Anni Daulter (August 18) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CASSIOPEIA was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CASSIOPEIA(talk) 15:12, 18 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Mkhartung528! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CASSIOPEIA(talk) 15:12, 18 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anni Daulter (November 8) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by K.e.coffman was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
K.e.coffman (talk) 23:07, 8 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest edit

  Hello, Mkhartung528. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Draft:Anni Daulter, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:07, 8 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Anni Daulter edit

I've worked a bit on this article and moved it over to mainspace. You might like to look through some of the changes I've made as they could help you with future articles. May I also suggest you join the Women in Red which can help you with further work on women's biographies.--Ipigott (talk) 17:05, 17 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mary David Walgenbach has been accepted edit

 
Mary David Walgenbach, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 21:42, 3 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Welcome! edit

 
Some cookies to welcome you!  

Welcome to Wikipedia, Mkhartung528! Thank you for your contributions. I am Rosiestep and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Rosiestep (talk) 19:38, 9 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Saint Agatha article edit

Hi Mk, you might have noticed that I expanded St. Agatha Lin last night, after you added content from that marvelous source you found. I'm so glad you found it, because it meant that I was able to remove the stub template. That's one of the things that's so fun about editing WP; we work together to find sources so that little articles can grow. I thought that the source could be better utilized, so I added information into it. I also made some formatting changes. You probably have better access to sources in general, so thanks for making this article better. See you around the 1000 Women project and around WP. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 16:12, 6 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Amazing!! I’ve discovered I love filling in the stubs! I’ve just been using google scholar, which is available to everyone! It seems like it’s a quick and easy way to find out if there are any really useful sources. Mkhartung528 (talk) 03:42, 7 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Very good. I need to use Google scholar for these saint articles. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 03:48, 7 June 2020 (UTC)Reply