Mjo5650

Sarabeth Tucek

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. However, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article, or any other Wikipedia page, must include proper sources. Thank you. The point in this case is not whether the artist wants the information published, but whether it actually has already been published. Information on Wikipedia must be information that has already been published - it is based on verifiability, not truth. - Ghmyrtle (talk) 22:08, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Please do not issue threats. I strongly suggest that you read WP:V and WP:BLP before you consider making any further edits to the article. I shall report have reported the issue at WP:ANI in any event. Ghmyrtle (talk) 15:28, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Note I've reverted your edit as you were using primary sources in a BLP. Please read Wikipedia:Blp#Misuse_of_primary_sources. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 17:58, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Sources

A magazine or a newspaper article stating the birth date of the subject would be considered a reliable source. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:59, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:51, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

April 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Sarabeth Tucek. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:28, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Please Read

Mjo5650, please read Wikipedia:Blp#Misuse_of_primary_sources: "Do not use trial transcripts and other court records, or other public documents, unless a reliable secondary source has published the material. Do not use public records that include personal details, such as date of birth, home value, traffic citations, vehicle registrations, and home or business addresses.". This is Wikipedia policy and you will be blocked from editing if you continue to add your info in its present form. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:31, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

sarabeth tucek

can everyone stop adding to my page! this is so awful. i take it down and you all put it back up! why? it's mean spirited. it's my life. please stop. thank you, sarabeth tucek —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hariyashi (talk • contribs) 06:52, 17 April 2010 (UTC)