Mizery Made

The Regime

Cuzzo.. I am Yuk's rebmaster.. I run Smokealotrecords.com UDStyle is short for Untouchable Design Style lol. I know the regime, and to be real there are a lot more regime members that don't even rap that Yuk didn't mention. Mrs Story works with Smoke-A-Lot and worked a little toward AOW3.. DJ Fingaz is our official DJ but he is not Regime. He is a signed Smoke-A-Lot DJ. I was at smoke house studios when it was recorded so trust me on this. :)

The web page is not outdated, those were the only names that were wanted on the site. We did not mention ppl like KP, because he doesn't rap. etc. Yuk was calling out Regime and niggas that helped put it together.

As for it not working on other explorers I tested them on all of those and they worked for me. Check your ISP. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Udstyle (talk • contribs) 00:43, July 21, 2006

Strength and Loyalty

You ask "how many sources do you want?" — just one; none had been given before, except a general link to a Website with the implied message that we had to look for information ourselves. I've removed that one again, and the two commercial links, which aren't allowed here. The other two are fine; giving one of those originally would have saved a lot of trouble. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 16:59, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Re: edits to Misery Loves Kompany & Celcius

Apologies for those incorrect edits. In the 200 or so pages with 'villian(s)' that I corrected, I got a couple wrong. I've added an exception to my lists so those pages will be ignored in future. Thanks Rjwilmsi 17:07, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Siccness

Do you goto siccness?—Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiggl3sLimited (talk • contribs) 17:50, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Im just wondering i goto it to, whats your name? Wiggl3sLimited 16:00, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

edits to Killer album cover

thanks for Expanding the Fair Use summary for me on it..

Mad Props Jride247 (talk) 03:19, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Celcius - Front.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Celcius - Front.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it may be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 13:38, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Kutt Calhoun

An article that you have been involved in editing, Kutt Calhoun, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kutt Calhoun. Thank you. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 14:07, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Kutt Calhoun

Thanks for taking the time to add to the Kutt Calhoun wiki page!! Imma work on Kaliko's page next once I get some free time.. Hopefully we can get these pages to stay up. Thanks again, Freecharlesgrace (talk) 23:36, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Done. User:Mizery_Made/Kutt_Calhoun. Please update it quickly, as it may be deleted again if it is not fixed. When it is ready, I can look at it if you like and see whether it meets the guidelines, and move it back to mainspace. If you'd rather, you can just move it yourself. ffm 16:18, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Sole

Thanx for that correction on Sole. I grabbed the wrong info box by accident. LaterMcelite (talk) 04:44, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

AWB mistake

Thanks for that, obviously hip hop articles are hard to go through with AWB due to all the slang and cut words, I just didn't see any context for it to be spelled like that, so I figured it was probably just a misspelling. Thanks for notifying me. :) — neuro^(talk) 19:03, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

List of best selling album sales

I will provide the/another appropriate source since the RIAA "website" is not always accurate nor up-to-date. If you check the release dates of some albums on that site, they are not all correct either. Perhaps another RIAA verification is warranted, but in the mean time Please Hammer, Don't Hurt 'Em can remain at 10x. Thank you! Jon the editor (talk) 06:38, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

I'm well knowledgeable of Hammer, most of the entries about him and his music are my edits (using more than one user ids over time) but you may be right about the "world wide" sales now that I think about it. I will double-check and see if I can't provide a better RIAA source that can be viewed on the internet I guess. If not, I concede and the way it is will do. It is correctly sourced in other articles already anyways. Thanks, have a nice day! Jon the editor (talk) 06:49, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

The thing here is, you cited a sales total. Sure, the album may have sold 18 million copies since it's release, that's great, but the way that article is currently set up, it works off of RIAA certifications. The album may have sold 18 million, but 10 million of that may have come from the US (and thus apply to the Certification) while the other 8 million come from elsewhere in the world. Or those last 8 million may not fall under the criteria for Certification. Fact remains that you inserted it with "18x Platinum" and then "18 Platinum" which are both incorrect statements. A possible solution would be to list the Certication and that be the sorting criteria, and then have a second column for Sales Totals. However with that, you run into the problem that it's "in the United States" whereas a lot of totals will be for worldwide sales and not specific to the US. So sure, find a source that states it's 18x platinum, however you're still going to run into the argument of RIAA vs. Your Source, and I'm afraid the RIAA's site will likely win that arguement since they're the authority on RIAA certification.

For the record, that previous paragraph was typed before you added your second paragraph, which you acknowledge some of what I just said. Though it does cover a thing or two you mention, so, I'm posting it anywayMizery Made (talk · contribs) 06:56, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

No problem, I understand. Thanks for the input. And this is honestly not to get into an edit war or fight, it's just to express some "mistakes" or "contradictions" if you and others are getting your info from the RIAA site only. Here is why, it's not accurate or updated nor is it truly the "final word" on album sales even in the US (I say that only because there is a margin of human error even with them supposedly being the self-claimed "authority" on all sales). I also say this because there are inconsistencies within their own categories. This is off the record and besides the point, but keep in mind, for whatever reason people may resent/hate Hammer, they will try to discredit his talent as much as possible out of jealousy or hatred maybe (in my life-time experience). I don't know, but I have seen article after article that did not give the appropriate props for his albums/talents. With that said, if you will look at these three pages, he is listed in one, not another and then more notably, the ORIGINAL release date of his album is incorrect. Per other sources I've sited within other articles, a month prior the album was released, then re-released in February 1990. The album was recorded and cut in 1989 and even songs performed in late '89 (such as U Can't Touch This). Now why I say this is because the certification date is way back in April of 1991. Since then, many more than that have been sold nearly 20 years later. Anyone would know, with the impact of that album via media and "word of mouth", more than 10x have been sold. That's simple math and common knowledge. Not only globally but within the USA. Yes, "x" indicates more than have been sold but it would be more accurate to increase it. But if this article only goes by what RIAA is saying, then so be it. Doesn't make it right though and this is only one article on the subject. 10X is a standard/generic amount that keeps getting quoted year after year but it is out-dated and inaccurate. (It's like how I hear people talk about what Jesus did over 2000 years ago. I've heard that since I was a child and now I'm adult. It's been more than 2000 years, for example, but that's what keeps getting "passed on" and remembered). Reason being, 10X was what it initially sold back when it was first released. But like with Micheal Jackson or Tupac albums for instance, more get sold years later. Especially when songs like U Can't Touch This are still marketed in present day media and new fans (or old) buy it again. And this isn't the only album there is a discrepancy with on that site. And there are other sources off the Internet that could verify well over 10X as well, not to mention he wasn't even mentioned in one category but is in another. Not very accurate, but again, I concede only because it will come down to "who's right, who's wrong" issue on here (not saying with you, just in general) and it's not worth the brain damage. (smile) I know what I know and it's enough for me not to prove a point. I am just playing devil's advocate and giving another explanation. Once more, this is just one specific article on the subject, not the "bible" of accurate album sales no matter what they self-proclaim. Graciously, good night.

http://www.riaa.com/goldandplatinumdata.php?resultpage=3&table=tblTopArt&action=

http://www.riaa.com/goldandplatinumdata.php?table=tblTop100

http://www.riaa.com/goldandplatinumdata.php?table=tblDiamond

Cert. Date 04/15/1991 Release Date 02/12/1990

P.S. I'm not trying to be a "Know-it-all" or schooling you, just explaining my view on the matter. That's what the talk pages are for I'm told. (smile) Jon the editor (talk) 07:54, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Hammer is actually listed on all three of the linked pages. The Top 100 albums covers only the albums, and his highest certified (and only one to reach high enough to be included on this list) is "Please Hammer, Don't Hurt 'Em." That first link however is the top selling Artists, which then takes all his releases into consideration. If you check page 2 of this list, you will see that Hammer is listed in the area of the 16's, which is how many million units he's had certified all together over all his albums and such. The release date being wrong isn't exactly relevant to the issue at hand. RIAA is the group that gives the Platinum certifications, which is the relevant information coming from their site. That article is set up around the RIAA certification, so it they only have it certified for 10, then that's what the article has to state.

Now... I don't necassarily agree with this... but it's actually opposite to your argument as to why I say that. You disagree with it because they have Hammer listed at 10, while you're providing proof he's sold more. My gripe is that the RIAA doesn't even go on "sales." Well, it kind of depends on your definition of a sale. They go on "shipments," so if a store orders 100 copies, those 100 will count toward certification regardless if someone picks them up off the shelf and buys them, or they sit there for a year. Thus, something may be certified platinum, but actually has only sold 800,000 while the other 200,000 copies are sitting on the shelf of Best Buy. However, that's where the argument of "Sale" comes in. Soundscan bases their information on the end customer actually purchasing it, however that store has to buy the album to then turn around and sell it to you for a retail price. Thus, a shipment could still be considered a sale.

As for an edit war, it really would lead to one. I honestly wouldn't run right back and revert your edit again if you tried to put it back at 18. I did it once, and stated why, I don't have a desire to patrol that page and revert it each time. I just happened to stop by there and see your edit. However, others would probably take the same stance that I had (that the RIAA only has it certified at 10, regardless of what sales totals you can provide) I think a lot of the reason it goes on RIAA certification as opposed to say, Soundscan numbers, is because the RIAA openly provides certification information on their site, while Soundscan is mostly for industry insiders. There are snippets of their charts posted on the internet, but they only cover like the top 200 selling albums, and thus isn't an effective source.

FYI as well, the "x" doesn't mean more, it means "times." So "10x Platinum" means it's been certified "platinum 10 times." You're probably thinking of "10+ Platinum" which would mean "10 (or more) platinum."

Like I mentioned though, I'm not trying to get into an edit war with you, or some big debate about "I'm right, you're wrong." Merely offering a different view on the issue, and hopefully doing so in a way that comes off as friendly and not like I'm sitting here mashing the keys in anger. You know? Cheers. Mizery Made (talk · contribs) 08:24, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Gotcha. No worries about an edit war, like I said, I concede. But thanks for shedding light on the matter. And yeah, oops... I did mean +. My bad. I do agree that there is room for improvement with "counting" units sold/shipped. There is always a margin of error/accuracy. By the way, I did not see Hammer on the total albums sold, but I must have overlooked it. At any rate, it's all good either way. I appreciate the lesson, as I wasn't as knowledgeable on the subject surrounding the logistics of RIAA. Peace and happiness! Jon the editor (talk) 20:27, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Your infobox suggestions at Harper’s Island

Your suggestions at the Talk page for Harper’s Island were brilliant! I especially like your Option A. You obviously have a lot of experience working with television infoboxes. I have very little, but knew that there had to be a better manner in which to present the information. Thanks! You did a lot of work in coming up with those suggestions! — SpikeToronto (talk) 18:51, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

TALKBACK: Your Archive Suggestion at Harper’s Island

Hello, Mizery Made. You have new messages at Talk:Harper's Island.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

King of Darkness

I've been posting up "King of Darkness" as the meaning for K.O.D for over a month now in which you keep reverting it (Because you couldn't find it). Now let's hope you can because it's there in GIANT letters. --69.152.44.241 (talk) 15:28, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Dinner and a Movie (album) tracks

Hello, Mizery Made. I was wrong about your "Bio" reference [1] for the tracks. I expected the "Bio" to be, well, a biography, so I assumed you were citing the pre-sale announcement at the top of the page, then compounded the error by transposing words in the performer's name when I searched for confirming sources. Sorry. I did stop and reverse those edits as soon as I realized what had happened. However, I cannot find "The Foe" in the source you cited [2], nor even the text foe. Can you tell me where in the article I should look for it? Yappy2bhere (talk) 20:19, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Yeah. I saw that you noticed your error and made an effort to correct it (I merely reverted to add the citation tags back). Regarding "The Foe," it's not actually in the article. It's in the Media Player on the left hand side of the player. The three tracks contained in there are an excerpt of the Strange Music 2010 sampler "Infection." Not the best of sources, I know, but it still establishes another confirmed track. It may be a mute point soon, seeing as it's up for deletion and I've yet to find some recent articles to give it a chance of standing. Figured that would occur, which is why I started a page for it in my namespace to work on, before someone created that page in the Wiki-space. Thought I might as well do what I could to give it a fighting chance though. We'll see. Mizery Made (talk · contribs) 20:58, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Dinner and a Movie (album) "Pre-order" track

Hello Mizery Made. I left a message here, but of course you must be watching the article, so I moved the message to the article's Talk page. I'll stop smudging up your talk page with matters that belong over there. Yappy2bhere (talk) 04:07, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Uni5: The World's Enemy

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Uni5: The World's Enemy. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uni5: The World's Enemy. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Strange music

Hi, thanks for your edit summary note. Yes, you are indeed right about the quote; I hope you meant "8th", not spelled out, since that is what I've returned it to. On "U.S.", the infobox example is not in any way definitive, and is in dire need of updating in any case; indeed editors need to more diligent in shaping the information and formatting of infoboxes to each particular musical topic, if infoboxes are to gain more respect and are to work well in relation to the main text. "U.S." is, in my view, undesirably stumpy in such a context at the top: I have changed it to "United States", which is more stylish in isolation (preferred, too, by some authorities). I have not linked it, since WP:LINK says not to; I cannot fathom what the utility of such a link would be to the reader. There is no consensus at all that infoboxes are somehow exempt from the style guides. Please take this up on the talk page or on my talk page if you have a query about it. Tony (talk) 14:17, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

hey

sorry.--Kidd Fr3sh (talk) 03:21, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Tech N9ne

My mistake about removing the information in the heading. I posted my revision as you posted yours, so there was a conflict. I went back and added your stuff to my version, and I missed what you added in the heading. Anyway, I'll be working on the article a little more later today, and finish it up tommorrow.Juggalobrink (talk) 19:34, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

That's fair enough. I'm glad to see somebody attempting to improve the page, as it's been in dire need of some work for a while. I always mean to dig in and try to do something with it myself, but always end up getting sidetracked or otherwise discouraged. I've actually had a text document on my computer that I start a few years ago that I intended to be a complete rewrite (which was mainly using information from the T9X documentary, with various other sources scattered throughout)... but its just sat there for the longest. Interested how your 'final product' will turn out. – Mizery Made ^{(talk · contribs)} 00:17, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Your text will certainly come in handy. I've been searching around for some sources online and don't have too much more additional information to add. Just a lot of clean up to the article and structure. That video I'm sure would help explain a lot.Juggalobrink (talk) 01:16, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

I've finished my expansion and clean up of the article.Juggalobrink (talk) 14:07, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

In general, I think it's a step in the right direction. The "career" section could stand some expansion though I believe, as currently it reads for the most part like "in xxxx he released, the following here he released and then he released." It could probably use some more album specific information to flush it out like is present for K.O.D., or some more events interweaven were possible like Rock the Bells. In my opinion, I feel the "In popular culture" has been condensed far too much. I think it was beneficial to have some context to the various appearances (and not simply list "his music appeared on x, y and z show" for instance) and gave better understanding to it. May only be me who thinks that way however. – Mizery Made ^{(talk · contribs)} 20:23, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Track listing/testcases3

Template:Track listing/testcases3 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. mabdul 21:34, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

November 2012

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Tech N9ne. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Mindy Dirt (talk) 14:40, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

• That's the thing: I'm glad you read the second section of WP:ELOFFICIAL--"Minimize the number of links". Thank you. Mindy Dirt (talk) 16:11, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Strange Music

My bad about thatm for some reason I always get Kutt Calhoun and Krizz mixed up, explaining me putting 2004. However do you not think we should at least put 2008 for Krizz as he must have been signed to Strange by then at the latest, if not earlier due to his first album being released that year. Before I assumed he signed much earlier based off a Tech interview where he said they had been doing business together for over a decade. It is pretty hard to find an online source for an Independent record label signing that place a couple years ago. STATic message me! 06:26, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

While it is safe to assume that he was signed at the time that his album came out in 2008, it would be inaccurate to put that on the page, seeing as he could have been signed earlier. I recall Kaliko 'announced' that he had finally officially signed, and I seem to recall this being around 2006 as I think it was around the time his son was born. The trouble is, I can't recall where this 'announcement' was made. It may have been on the Siccness forums, or it may have been on his old MySpace page. I tried asking him on Twitter a while back, but the answer wasn't very specific as I mentioned him signing in 2005 or 2006 and he replied "Yeah, but I've been working with them since 2000". So again, it's around 2005-2006. May be difficult to uncover a source for it, but Kutt didn't have a year until it was confirmed in that XXL article. So there's still hope we'll get a legitament year for Kaliko as well. – Mizery Made ^{(talk · contribs)} 07:07, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Tried getting the information from him again, and was more successful this time. Reply on Twitter Here he states that he signed with the label in 2006. It's not exactly a "valid source" for Wikipedia, since it comes from the individual in question, but it's better than just "guessing/assuming." – Mizery Made ^{(talk · contribs)} 11:22, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

That is just fine. As long as his Twitter is verified we can use it as a reliable source. STATic message me! 15:31, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mama Said Knock You Out (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heavy metal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:34, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Something Else (Tech N9ne album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• N9ne – ‘Something Else’ – Songs And Cover Art Featured In ‘The Independent Powerhouse’ Sampler [Download] | Tech N9ne |publisher=Blog.therealtechn9ne.com |date=2013-03-15 |accessdate=
• | extra12 = Shane Eli & Jon Pakfar<ref>[http://www.djbooth.net/index/tracks/review/tech-n9ne-so-dope "So Dope" on DJ Booth</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:11, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=</nowiki>

• | writer9 = A. Yates, Ashley Hart, [[Game (rapper)|Jayceon Taylor, M. Summers
• | writer13 = A. Yates, [[B.o.B|Bobby Ray Simmons Jr., [[Wiz Khalifa|Cameron Thomaz]], [[Drumma Boy|Christopher Gholson]]

your edit] to Something Else (Tech N9ne album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:11, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Something Else (Tech N9ne album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mike Dean (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Recent edit to Killer (Tech N9ne album)

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits as you did to Killer (Tech N9ne album). Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you are given a good deal of freedom in what you write. Thank you!   Bfpage |leave a message  19:01, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Excuse me, but I believe you're mistaken. – Mizery Made ^{(talk · contribs)} 19:05, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

I apologize, sorry about that.

  Bfpage |leave a message  01:27, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Ces Cru is not on the Deluxe version of 'Special Effect's by Tech N9ne

If it really was you'd be able to tell me the name of the song! What is it then? Have you even listened to this cd? Check the tracklist below, Ces Cru is nowhere to be found. I've heard EVERY song on the deluxe edition of 'Special Effect's. Please check your information before contradicting someone with more experience or knowledge than you. Please stop being ignorant and stubborn.

P.S. If you really believe me to be wrong still, than what is the name of the song Ces Cru is featured on? I'll wait.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by KaydenCooper (talk • contribs) 16:59, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

I'm a tad confused by this "attack" of yours, seeing as you're the one that reverted the edit by the IP Address which removed Ces Cru from the list of features. However, to satisfy you... Ces Cru appear on "

Young Dumb Full of Fun", which is contained on the iTunes Deluxe Edition. – Mizery Made ^{(talk · contribs)} 02:09, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mizery Made. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mizery Made. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mizery Made. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Worst - Front.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Worst - Front.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:56, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Worst 2K Edition - Front.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Worst 2K Edition - Front.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:57, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Celcius - Front.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Celcius - Front.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:09, 29 April 2024 (UTC)