elcome to Wikipedia Mishaindiana, from WP:WER
Thank you for registering! We hope that you find collaborative editing enjoyable. Wikipedia, an online encyclopedia that started in 2001, is free for all to use and edit within the guidelines and principles users have established and adhere to. Many of these principles and guidelines are listed below. Click on the link next to the images for more information. REMEMBER - each policy and/or guideline page has a discussion you can join to ask questions, add input and contribute your voice towards any current policy or guideline change underway! Join the discussion by going to the talkpage of the article. Please take a minute to view a number of quick start pages for an overview of how to work within these guidelines and more information to help you better understand the practices and procedures editors are using. These include: The Newcomers Manual and User:Persian Poet Gal/"How-To" Guide to Wikipedia.

Sometimes new editors become frustrated quickly and find their experience on Wikipedia less than enjoyable. This need not be. If you are having a difficult time for any reason, please feel free to ask me for assistance! Or, better yet, visit The Teahouse where veteran editors are waiting to assist you.

Policies, guidelines and peer assistance Help and Tutorials
The five pillars of Wikipedia.
The fundamental principles of the project.
Tutorial.
Step-by-step guide on how to edit.
Main policies of Wikipedia.
Wikipedia's main policies and guidelines.
How to start a page.
If you want to create a new article
Style Guide.
The complete guide to how articles should look
.
Help.
The complete help guide
Copyright.
Addressing copyright concerns
.
Quick reference.
A handy quick reference guide for editing Wiki.
Help Desk.
Here you can ask other editors for assistance
Your user pages and your sandbox.
Editing in your own "personal" space
Adoption program.
Request an experienced guide for your first steps of editing.
Frequently asked questions.
Some common questions and their answers.

This is being posted on your Talk page where you can receive messages from other Wikipedians and discuss issues and respond to questions. At the end of each message you will see a signature left by the editor posting. This is done by signing with four ~~~~ or by pressing or in the editing interface tool box, located just above the editing window (when editing). Do not sign edits that you make in the articles themselves as those messages will be deleted, but only when using the article talkpage, yours or another editor's talkpage. If you have any questions or face any initial hurdles, feel free to contact me on my talk page and I will do what I can to assist or give you guidance and contact information.

Again, welcome! John from Idegon (talk) 21:29, 17 March 2014 (UTC) John from Idegon (talk) 21:29, 17 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse! edit

 
Hello! Mishaindiana, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! John from Idegon (talk) 21:29, 17 March 2014 (UTC)Reply


High school articles edit

Hi, Mishaindiana. I'm John from Idegon. Glad to see your interest in high school articles. It may be to your benefit to familiarize yourself with the guidelines for high school articles at WP:SCH/AG. One of the topics covered there are school songs. Mentioning the titles is fine, but we do not put in the lyrics. There are a couple of reasons for this but the main one is the potential for copyright issues. I am glad to see you have self reverted your reinsertion of the lyrics.

I assume from your username that you are originally from Indiana. Me, too. I hail from "Da Region" although I have been gone a long long time. Welcome to Wikipedia and happy editing. If I can ever be of help, feel free to contact me on my talk page. John from Idegon (talk) 21:34, 17 March 2014 (UTC)Reply


Thank you - N

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jenna's Law (September 22) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 13:19, 22 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jenna's Law (September 27) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 06:38, 27 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Patricia Leavy (September 27) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 06:41, 27 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Our IRC conversation edit

Hiya, I am going to assume it was you in IRC just a few minutes ago (if not, feel free to ignore the rest of this post). Your final comment before you left made me think that you had misunderstood my statement. Notability is not inherited, meaning that just because someone is listed on another Wikipedia page, does not mean that they themselves should have a page. Every page must be judged on its own merits, so please continue working on your draft! If you want more help, stop by the Teahouse, Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 17:02, 28 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Patricia Leavy (February 17) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 23:57, 17 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Patricia Leavy (February 20) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RadioFan was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
RadioFan (talk) 15:11, 20 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jenna's Law (February 22) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 05:07, 22 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Patricia Leavy (April 23) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 21:04, 23 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jenna's Law (May 2) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Music1201 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Music1201 talk 02:40, 2 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Patricia Leavy (September 18) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cerebellum was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Cerebellum (talk) 20:31, 18 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jenna's Law has been accepted edit

 
Jenna's Law, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 01:57, 11 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Patricia Leavy edit

 

Hello, Mishaindiana. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Patricia Leavy".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 06:36, 22 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problem on Draft:Patricia Leavy edit

Material you included in the above draft appears to have been copied from the copyright web page http://www.patricialeavy.com/bio. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:19, 13 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

July 2017 edit

  Your addition to Draft:Patricia Leavy has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:33, 29 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Patricia Leavy (March 14) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Missvain was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Missvain (talk) 14:08, 14 March 2018 (UTC)Reply