The sentence beginning "Unfortunately for Somerled, his demise denied him the ecclesiastical reunification he sought..."seems awkward. Proposed rephrase: "Somerled's demise precluded the ecclesiastical reunification he sought..." Mischievousgnome (talk) 15:30, 1 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Velocity Dependent Inertial Induction (April 5) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 08:08, 5 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Mischievousgnome! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 08:08, 5 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Velocity dependent inertial induction has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Velocity dependent inertial induction. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:56, 6 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Velocity dependent inertial induction has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Velocity dependent inertial induction. Thanks! Sam-2727 (talk) 16:44, 8 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Help me! edit

Please help me with... Hello, I would like to obtain an opinion on a biographical article I am preparing about a living person as regards its suitability for submission. I have also encountered a formatting problem with which I would like some help. The draft is currently in my sandbox. Thank you for your attention. Mischievousgnome (talk) 15:08, 19 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

I believe that this edit resolved the "formatting issue." If there are any other formatting issues, please list them below. 78.28.44.111 (talk) 15:24, 19 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
As for the suitability of the draft for submission, I'd say it still needs a bit of work; right now it reads like a resume. I'm also not entirely sure whether its subject meets our notability requirements; I think you should go through the list at WP:NSCIENTIST, identify which of the criteria are met by your article's subject, and then modify the lead section of your draft to contain a clear assertion of notability. Right now, it just says what basically amounts to "the person is an academic and has a job in his field." 78.28.44.111 (talk) 15:48, 19 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your response. I believe you have resolved the formatting issue, for which I am grateful. With regard to the second comment, I will follow your suggestion and expand the lead paragraph. In this first draft, I endeavoured to restrict myself to stating the relevant facts as succinctly as possible.Mischievousgnome (talk) 16:54, 19 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Further to the above, I have expanded the lead paragraph to include more detail pertaining to notability. The first sentence remains basically the same. If you read further, you will see that the subject meets almost all the criteria set out in the WP:NSCIENTIST section. As regards the formatting problem, I note that the contents still sit above the page title, rather than below. Is there a simple fix for that? Much obliged for your advice and suggestions. Mischievousgnome (talk) 18:25, 19 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

There indeed is a simple fix, you can add __TOC__ wherever you wish within a page, as I did in this edit, and it will move the table of contents to that location. 78.28.44.111 (talk) 18:52, 19 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for fixing the problem and for your suggestions. Mischievousgnome (talk) 17:49, 20 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amitabha Ghosh (June 16) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AaqibAnjum were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 21:50, 16 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived edit

 

Hi Mischievousgnome! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Help with revising rejected article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 22 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amitabha Ghosh (academic, born 1941) has been accepted edit

 
Amitabha Ghosh (academic, born 1941), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SL93 (talk) 08:12, 26 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Velocity dependent inertial induction edit

  Hello, Mischievousgnome. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Velocity dependent inertial induction, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:05, 12 April 2021 (UTC)Reply