Welcome! edit

Hi Mingebinge2! I noticed your contributions to Kosmos 110 and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! — The Most Comfortable Chair 09:56, 27 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

May 2021 edit

  Hello, I'm MelecieDiancie. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Pressurized Mating Adapter, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.  | melecie | t 07:46, 18 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia and copyright edit

  Hello Mingebinge2! Your additions to Shooting of Jean Charles de Menezes have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:44, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, I had links and references cited but was disrupted during my process. Full links and the articles have been completed to the standard that was intended before. My work is within this industry so I am aware of issues, the disruption whilst writing this article was beyond my control. Mingebinge2 (talk) 22:02, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Suspect: The Shooting of Jean Charles de Menezes (TV series) (November 7) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:33, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Mingebinge2! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:33, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Suspect: The Shooting of Jean Charles de Menezes (TV series) (November 8) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ReaderofthePack was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 15:01, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you ReaderofthePack, your comments were helpful. I was previously using other recent series for Disney+ that had been successful in their creation, but I was trying to also shoehorn the recent controversy into it as well. I realized a little too late that less is more and the larger article made it weaker in this case. As it stands the controversy will pass and the series will air regardless, and so I leave it at just the basics, with IMDB and the same Deadline link that IMDB uses, and Disney's own press release. Mingebinge2 (talk) 18:35, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Suspect: The Shooting of Jean Charles de Menezes (TV series) (November 8) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:47, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Suspect: The Shooting of Jean Charles de Menezes (TV series) edit

  Hello, Mingebinge2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Suspect: The Shooting of Jean Charles de Menezes (TV series), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:06, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply