April 2008 edit

Actually, I am not sure why I did that. Sorry. J.delanoygabsadds 17:49, 17 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Tori Amos: rape vs sexual assault edit

So CNN.com says she was raped, and Tori Amos herself says it was more like the threat of mutilation. This is why I suggested we leave the text to saying "sexually assaulted" until someone comes along and elaborates and provides sources. Please refer to the exerpt from Hot Press that was linked.

Samuel Grant (talk) 19:28, 17 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

That quote doesn't seem to lend any weight to the idea that she wasn't raped. She says the night was more about "mutilation" rather than "violation through sex", but that doesn't mean she wasn't raped, it just means that she thought the attacker's main motivation was mutilation rather than rape. This seems to be heavily original research, if you don't mind me saying. Whereas I have provided a very reliable, heavily reviewed, source that clearly says she was raped. If there are other sources, I would be happy to discuss them, but I really don't think the above one is of much value for the reasons I stated. MillieTant (talk) 21:51, 18 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
Right. What I meant really in my message was that it really needs to be elaborated on and sourced. There have been questions as to what exactly happened to her and I was interpreting the excerpt in a different way. Samuel Grant (talk) 19:49, 22 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

flashing edit

I didn't, you have the wrong person. Bobisbob (talk) 22:27, 7 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yes, he did: see this diff. Noted on his talk page ... richi (hello) 17:55, 8 May 2008 (UTC)Reply