User talk:Michig/Archive 18

Thanks!

Thanks for participating in my RFA! I appreciate your support. Zagalejo^^^ 06:25, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Deletion review for Aleksandrs Čekulajevs

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Aleksandrs Čekulajevs. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Metropolitan90 (talk) 22:03, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Biruitorul

Biruitorul implied that your IQ is low, and I figured I'd let you know. --Madmans stone (talk) 20:10, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

He may have meant that his own edits were responsible for the perceived change. Who knows? --Michig (talk) 20:26, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Who indeed? Meanwhile, let me note that Madmans stone, like earlier incarnations Ondskan2 and Redroom2, is a sockpuppet of banned User:Anittas. (Note the pattern of stalking me, Dahn and Anonimu.) It would be prudent to block him and strike his two votes in deletion discussions. - Biruitorul ^Talk 20:37, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

If you feel there is a case here, please open a sockpuppet report, as I will be offline for the next day or so. --Michig (talk) 20:42, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Opinion

Could you opine on this this matter. Regards AdabowtheSecond (talk) 18:31, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

In Connection with the Artist Da'Ville

Hello Michig,

I am assisting the Artist Da’ville (Singer) to update his Wikipedia page – Da’ville wrote the bio himself, plus amended some other data which was incorrect, for example the record company names etc., plus he sent me a new photo that he wished to be uploaded and used. I sent an email to wiki admin confirming copyright and legality of the photograph; I received positive confirmation of my request. I have rechecked Da’ville’s Wikipedia page and I have noticed that you have amended the page back to the old version, where the details including bio is incorrect? I have reinstated the correct version and I would respectfully request that you allow the correct content to remain! If you require confirmation from the artist himself then please contact me Paul_Tandy@hotmail.com and I will pass his contact details over to you!

Sincere best wishes — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paultandy (talk • contribs) 07:01, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Replied here. --Michig (talk) 17:02, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your reply, just for re-clarification, the source of the information updated was from the artist himself and not my personal view! Clearly you prefer none bonafide information rather than from the person whose life is being written about? The image you continue to use is an old image and for this reason I requested and had approved from Wikipedia admin to use, I would ask that you would kindly reinstate this image please. Also, I note that you have removed Daville’s Date of birth? Daville himself confirmed to me that his DOB on the old version was incorrect? I understand that some of the new content could be seen as self-publication; therefore I agree that maybe some of the content was outside of Wikipedia rules - That said a lot of the new content which you have removed was correct information. If the information being supplied is by the very person himself, then I am therefore miffed as to why you continue to disbelieve the new content supplied. Once again in the interest of the truth, I would ask you to email me so I can provide you the contact person who will confirm that some of the information you persist to allow to go public is incorrect? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paultandy (talk • contribs) 19:08, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Information needs to be verifiable and sourced. If you have any specific issues with the article as it is, please discuss them on the article's talk page (Talk:Da'Ville). Thanks. --Michig (talk) 11:46, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

National League Pairs Championship

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of National League Pairs Championship, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://uk.ask.com/wiki/Speedway_Elite_League_Pairs_Championship.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:43, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Some of the content was based on our Premier League Pairs Championship article, which the ask.com article is simply a mirror of. --Michig (talk) 11:48, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

EADT

Hi, I didn't mean to revert you on the word Anglian, we just got caught up in editing at the same time. Sorry you had to make the edit twice. Regards, WWGB (talk) 09:57, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Sacrifice (band)

Hello! I saw that you removed the PROD from Sacrifice (band). It appears that you are an expert (or at least very knowledgable) in the subject area, and I won't bother with taking the article to AfD. However, I am frustrated that the article has existed for over a year without any sourcing; and that you gave information in your edit summary that I have been unable to verify. It may very well be that Sacrifice is notable and meets WP:NBAND per item #5 (two or more albums on a major label), but outside of Allmusic I have been completely unable to verify even that.

Would you consider revisiting the article and providing some RS if you have them? I don't really have an interest in starting to remove the unsourced material, but there is contentious material there. Thanks for your consideration, and Happy Editing! --Tgeairn (talk) 17:54, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

I'll see what I can do. Might have time this evening otherwise will look at it tomorrow.--Michig (talk) 20:09, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks... It's not my subject area, but I'll take a look later in the week too. Cheers! --Tgeairn (talk) 06:45, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Guns 'N Roses

Hey there, do you have any Stone Roses bios on hand? How are their quality, reliability, sourcing, and comprehensiveness? I bought an issue of Q lately with the Roses on the cover, and the cover story was written by someone with a new bio about the band coming out that sounded pretty thorough. WesleyDodds (talk) 13:20, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

I've got John Robb's book (The Stone Roses and the Resurrection of British Pop) which is pretty good - a lot of it's first hand, and it covers the early history quite well, although Robb is quite close to the band so it perhaps puts a more positive slant on some of the things that went on than others might, but he has an insight that someone simply sifting through old sources wouldn't have. It looks like his new book from earlier this year is an update on this. Mick Middles and Simon Spence also have books on the Roses out recently (I think the Q article was by Spence), but I don't have either - not a fan of the band to be honest. I started working through the Stone Roses article using the John Robb book as a source but gave up at about the release of the first album (The Stone Roses rather than the dire Garage Flower) for several reasons. --Michig (talk) 13:47, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Bark Bark Bark

		The Original Barnstar
		Great work finding the sources for Bark Bark Bark. That inspired me to take another look through the Interwebs where I found a couple decent write-ups on Jacob Cooper/Safari. I also agree with your suggestion to rename the article so that it incorporates his previous bands/projects. For this, and all of your excellent contributions to AfD, I want to thank you with this barnstar!  Gongshow Talk 06:31, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. And thanks for digging deeper into the subject in question - hopefully we'll end up with a reasonable article at the end of this. It's a constant challenge to get editors to look beyond the current state of articles and to consider options other than deletion, and it's always good when people are prepared to change their mind, so thanks for that as well.--Michig (talk) 18:31, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Yep, I know what you mean. Two of my favorite lines I've seen around here are "Unsourced ≠ Unsourceable" and "Redirects are cheap". Cheers,  Gongshow ^Talk 20:07, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

The Underground: Issue 1 (August/September 2012)

• Letter from the editor: New Format
• Article news: Work done and where you can help

• Project news: Signpost coverage
• Special Report: Wikimania

Delivered by In actu (Guerillero) on behalf of WikiProject Punk. You are receiving this because your user name is listed in Category:WikiProject Punk music members or on our participants list. If you would like to stop these sorts of updates please remove the userbox from your profile, remove the category from your profile, and/or move your name down to the Inactive/former members section of the participants list. Thanks.

Cheers,

benzband (talk) & Guerillero | My Talk 00:25, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Logo in name section

Please stop reverting my work as matter has already been resolved with an Admin!! K. (talk) 17:36, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Really? Which admin decided you should use that logo in the infobox? --Michig (talk) 21:18, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

User:Walter Görlitz didn't say I should but said I could. K. (talk) 21:41, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Where and when did he say that you could use a logo in the name field in an infobox? --Michig (talk) 22:43, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Re:September

Well just delete the disreputable sources then, no need to undo a good article like that. That's vandalism and if it keeps up I will have no choice but to report you to a higher authority. K. (talk) 21:41, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

I sincerely suggest you take it to the talk page if you dispute those sources. Sure they're not all reputable but I'm pretty sure most of them, the CD inlays & Tanya herself are reputable enough to know that it's Stephenson. K. (talk) 21:47, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

As explained on the talk page, the current version is not by any means a good article. --Michig (talk) 22:41, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Thank you

On another note, thank you for providing sources to Gangsta Blues, I really want that article & Rebelution (Tanya Stephens album) to become Good Articles. K. (talk) 17:38, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Tanya Stephens

I suggest you take it to the talk page before you both hit 3RR and get reported. Kerfuffler (talk) 21:43, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

I feel I've done all I can here - User:Djjazzyb simply isn't listening. It is completely unacceptable to replace a properly sourced BLP with an article full of unsourced statements and citations to sites like iTunes, discogs, rateyourmusic, and the German Wikipedia. If you really want to help you could restore the article to the last good version. --Michig (talk) 22:19, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

You added a Refimprove tag to the article, but the version before Djjazzyb started editing it was properly referenced. --Michig (talk) 22:53, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Yes. What led me here was that I saw it in RecentChanges, and observed there was a long string of references that didn't seem to make much sense; thus my tag. I hadn't looked at the page history at that point. Kerfuffler (talk) 23:06, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Could you please make your way to Talk:Tanya Stephens ASAP as I really wish to resolve the whole Stephens/Stephenson issue. I would also like to apolagise personally for being immature yesterday. I can see that you do a good job here, and you have improved the Tanya Stephens article quite a bit since yesterday. K. (talk) 04:09, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Re:

Sorry about that, I don't really get how cites work yet, will learn up on it. K. (talk) 14:02, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Sintoxicated

If you're not too busy, is there any chance you could help me turn Sintoxicated from the stub it is now to a full article please? K. (talk) 14:20, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

I've had a look but couldn't find much online other than it being described as "disastrous" in Vibe, but there's only a snippet view of that article here. --Michig (talk) 14:26, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Disastrous? That's a bit harsh, I'm listening to it now & I love it. Lol. But, I found that the album had charted in sweden and I've added that to the article, I tried to add it to Tanya Stephens in the discography section but I couldn't figure out how to add it in? K. (talk) 14:32, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Thumbs up

	Thumbs up
	Just wanted to say thanks for helping out with those Tanya articles, and to say no hard feelings about before K. (talk) 20:02, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. If I can help out with any other articles I will. --Michig (talk) 20:17, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

No problem, and if anything comes up I'll keep you in mind :-) K. (talk) 20:20, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Actually, I recently wrote an article Many Moods of Moses a beenie man album and that could still use a lot of work. K. (talk) 20:22, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

And same to you, if you have anything you need elp with or anything you want me to do, I'm pretty much always happy to do what I can. K. (talk) 20:26, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

I've added a source to Many Moods of Moses and some categories. There should be plenty around that can be used in this one. --Michig (talk) 20:37, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

I'd of thought so, I know that Who Am I (Sim Simma) is one of his most popular songs of all time, not just on this album as at has been used in Saint Row 2 & referenced by Nelly so should be quite easy to find some BG info, thanks K. (talk) 20:44, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

These should be useful:

• Allmusic review
• Billboard stating that it was the number one reggae album of the year in the US (result 2)
• Vibe
• Billboard again
• Spin review
• Paolo Ferrari's book
• CityPages review. --Michig (talk) 21:10, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, I'll add those now, thanks. By the way, do you happen to know why my recently created albums don't appear in the list when I type them into the search box? K. (talk) 22:26, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Hey, My Way (Lady Saw album) needs some more information and sourcing if you're up for it? Cheers, K. (talk) 02:34, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

User:99.99.174.248 and Wikijustice2013

Hi Michig. You warned User:99.99.174.248 about disruptive editing.[1] I believe they are the sockpuppet of Wikijustice2013, who has been copy/pasting the same "vote" and comment in many AfDs. I put a comment into all those AfDs to make editors aware of what's going on. By the way, the two editors both "voted" in this Afd for Kik Tracee. --76.189.97.91 (talk) 21:04, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Update: Nevermind. :) Both 99.99.174.248 and Wikijustice2013 have been blocked by Postdlf for sockpuppetry and retaliatory AfD postings.[2][3]. --76.189.97.91 (talk) 03:48, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

I was going to keep an eye on it today, but looks like the problem was resolved while I was asleep. Thanks anyway. --Michig (talk) 07:00, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

You're very welcome. :) --76.189.97.91 (talk) 07:07, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Could you help me out please?

Hey, I'm writing an article for Barrington Levy's Love The Life You Live album, and I'm having a really hard time finding the release date as all the sources point to a different date (I've seen '87 - '93). Any other info you can find on it would be deeply appreciated also, thanks, K. (talk) 01:43, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

I have two books which say 1988, but I believe that the original release was on the Time 1 label, and you can see here that on the label it says 1989. The French issue on Blue Moon also has 1989 on the label. It has been reissued since, e.g. by VP Records, but I think 1989 was the first release. They wouldn't say published 1989 if it had been released earlier. The infobox should reflect the original release - in this case 1989 and Time 1/Blue Moon.--Michig (talk) 06:07, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Thank you K. (talk) 10:30, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Hello again, as you might of noticed, my Wayne Jarrett article is coming along quite nicely, but I could really use some help with it if you're not too busy, thanks ever so much, K. (talk) 22:15, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

P.S., mind if I ask your name? I'm just find it quite informal that I keep asking you for help with my articles but I don't know your name, lol, mines Kane :-) K. (talk) 22:15, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Will try to take a look this evening. Just Michig (talk) 06:10, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Have had a look but aside from brief mentions in The Rough Guide to Reggae and The Virgin Encylopedia of Reggae which don't say much about him beyond his similarity to Horace Andy and the fact that he recorded for Glen Brown and Bullwackie, I didn't find much. There's This, and this shows him at #2 in a reggae chart, but there's not enough on view to tell much about it. Hopefully something will turn up. A bit of general advice - it's best to find at least 2 or 3 good sources before you create an article because new articles without enough sources tend to get tagged for deletion. --Michig (talk) 18:32, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks you, I was originally gonna do I Roy but I couldn't find anything at all about him. So I went to the WP:REGGAE section to see what other articles needed creating and I saw Wayne Jarrett, I couldn't resist as my last name is also Jarrett. K. (talk) 18:49, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Merge discussion for Esperanto music

I have proposed merging the article Esperanto music with the article Esperanto culture. You participated in a discussion of a proposal to delete the Esperanto music article earlier this year. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Naŋar (talk) 13:28, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Blur disruption

Michig, thanks for blocking the disruptive IP for a day, but it looks like he's back with a different address (also from Florida). Is there a case of protecting the page to prevent further disruption?—indopug (talk) 02:43, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

I'll keep an eye on it. With only a couple of IPs being used, further blocks may be more appropriate, but if there's more IP-hopping I'll semi-protect it. --Michig (talk) 07:36, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Thank you.—indopug (talk) 05:04, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Recreation of article

Hello! I request the recreation of the article with the name Christos Intzidis. I have the article already ready but I am not able to create it as it is locked. The football player has already participated in two league games and one european, so I believe that the article should be created as it meets the criteria needed. As I say above I have the article ready. Thank you in advance. Katantonis (talk) 14:42, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

I have restored the previous version, which you can now edit. Regards. --Michig (talk) 18:27, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Notable '80s bands without articles

I see you have a pile of redlinks to these on User:Michig/ToDo List (which I found 'cos Chakk, which I just started, is linked off it). I concur with pretty much the whole list. The trouble is, of course, that history started in 1995 and the only sources for these bands are that "paper" stuff that primitive prehistoric humanoids used. I left my NME archive in Australia, and it got eaten by silverfish anyway. So where would we start on tracking down someone who actually still has all their old music papers, and wouldn't object to a bunch of Wikipedians fondling them? I wonder if the deposit libraries have them - David Gerard (talk) 10:57, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

I can't remember now what I did with my old NME, Sounds, and Melody Makers, but I don't have them any more. I know the library service where I live used to get weekly music papers in every week. Whether they continued to store them somewhere, in an era where council buildings are being sold off and cuts made across the board, I doubt. Most on my todo list are bands that I do have sources for, generally in books that cover the era (e.g. Strong's Discography books or Larkin's Encyclopedia of Popular Music and its derivatives), but haven't got round to doing yet. There's always Rocksbackpages.com, but that seems to have an annoying (but understandable) habit of concentrating on bands and artists that have maintained interest levels over the years. It would be great if these old music papers could be digitized and made available online, but until that happens, it's going to be relatively difficult (bit not impossible) to create those article. I'll see what I can find on Chakk to add to the article. --Michig (talk) 11:27, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

I've added what I can. I seem to remember, by the way, that there's a template to go on the talk page of articles that have been mentioned in newspapers. --Michig (talk) 12:41, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Yes, Metro netted it all of 45 hits! I'm sure Chakk are pleased - David Gerard (talk) 23:55, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Landing Gear (arcade game)

I don't know if it would have made any difference to your close, but I think that you should be aware that several of the editors commenting here are pretty clear sockpuppets - see evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MountWassen. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:44, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

As there were no real arguments for keeping, I don't think it would have been closed as keep, but I may have relisted if some of those potential sockpuppet !votes had been struck, on grounds of insufficient input - I'm happy to reopen it and relist if you think it appropriate. --Michig (talk) 21:03, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

I think that the non-notability is pretty obvious, so my preference would be to let sleeping dogs lie. I just wanted to let you know in case you saw it differently. The place where the sockpuppets have been causing genuine disruption is Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salty Fingers (plant). Phil Bridger (talk) 21:13, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Prod tagging

I noticed you were a bit upset over some Prods that User:Wikipedical made on some articles.

Have a look at his [history]. He just went and tagged, in about 40 minutes, approximately 100 articles for deletion. I'm concerened he hasn't even read them. The prods also give editors like me barely any time to go through these articles and fix them up in a reasonable amount of time. Now I'm worried they're going to be deleted. Some of the prods I noticed right away are ridiculous, like for people who earned various prestigious national awards.

What should be done about this?? --Jethro B 02:50, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Certainly not good. From a previous spree several went to AfD after being declined, and I am also concerned by the AfD contributions of vcessayist ([4]) which show a similar pattern of making dozens of decisions in a very short space of time. --Michig (talk) 05:12, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

What do you recommend be done? ANI? Is it bad behavior, or just problematic? --Jethro B 18:05, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

I think that depends on whether they do the same again. Some of those prods were not even close to being in the 'assumption of good faith' area. I left a message on their talk page. It really depends on what they do now. --Michig (talk) 18:46, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Ok thanks. Also, did you deprod all the articles, or only some? I would've deprodded them myself, but wanted to make sure it was a legit action. Thank you so much though, it's really helpful. --Jethro B 20:04, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

I deprodded all but a few. Most were obviously inappropriate. With some the notability wasn't clear from the article but a Google News/Books search showed that they were notable. A few looked prod-worthy, which you might expect from an indiscriminate prodding spree. --Michig (talk) 20:08, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

OK once again thank you so much. --Jethro B 20:11, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

User Rodolfotoretti

Hey Michig, so Rodolfotoretti is undertaking the same edits at Blur (band) that the anon IPs were making, and I see he's engaged in blatant vandalism over at Oasis (band) which was quickly reverted. WesleyDodds (talk) 05:22, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

I have blocked him for edit-warring.--Michig (talk) 17:46, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digitel Tower

This Afd is also affected by the same sock farm as the Landing Gear (arcade game) above. While I agree that there's no individual notability, there now seems to be only one reliable !vote left in this case. De728631 (talk) 17:51, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

There's the nominator plus another experienced editor. Aside from the blocked editor, no other input in two weeks, so I felt the close was correct. --Michig (talk) 17:56, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Alright, then we'll let this rest. De728631 (talk) 18:05, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Welt (band)

Allmusic does not convey nobility as it lists music for *everybody*.

You said reliable refs were found, please add them to the article. While nobody does it, addressing the concerns in the article should be done, like adding refs. Bgwhite (talk) 21:15, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Allmusic doesn't 'list music for *everybody"'. I'm sure they would like to think their data is comprehensive, but I could name hundreds of bands not covered there. As a reliable source, significant coverage there (such as the bio and several reviews for Welt) does convey notability (I think that's what you meant) - a mere listing of releases (which is all it has for many artists) wouldn't. Yes, I will try to add references at some point. Not now though as it's late and I'm busy. --Michig (talk) 21:24, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

We should dig through these while they're hot

Or indeed still up at all - David Gerard (talk) 13:59, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Good find! I'll have a trawl through them later. Thanks. --Michig (talk) 14:11, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Select will mostly have had the already-famous, but contemporary print sources are always a good thing. I have also found Cactus Mouth Informer occasionally useful, particularly with my stack of ZigZag being long lost. (I suppose I should be spending my evenings and weekends in the BL, wikiing the magazine collections, but the family may not forgive me.) - David Gerard (talk) 18:43, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Another good find! It's a shame more of the magazines from that era are not available via the web. If only people would realise that when the do a Google search, they won't find all the coverage that exists for bands that were around before the mid-90s. Looks like there might be more of these sites out there, though, e.g. [5]. --Michig (talk) 19:00, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

And then this - Smash Hits on a 30-year delay. Good Lord. I can't imagine anyone in this not having an article, but you never know! - David Gerard (talk) 21:16, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Actually, I think I still have a pile of old Smash Hits somewhere. There are a few bands listed there that we don't have articles on yet, including OK Jive, who I vaguely remember and The Cucumbers, who I don't. If only I had more time... --Michig (talk) 21:38, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Oh, wow. Yes, there should be material for a start on any band that at least got into the top 40 - David Gerard (talk) 20:29, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seven Lions

Hello, Michig. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seven Lions.
Message added -- Trevj (talk) 11:06, 12 November 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/F-Beat Records

Hello. You have a new message at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/F-Beat Records's talk page. —Northamerica1000^(talk) 02:22, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Hello. You have a new message at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/F-Beat Records's talk page. (Follow-up comment). —Northamerica1000^(talk) 08:53, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Moderat Likvidation

Hello Michig: per your exceptional research, I have withdrawn the deletion nomination at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moderat Likvidation. Northamerica1000^(talk) 02:56, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanseer Saji

I think you should do a tad more investigating first. Bgwhite (talk) 05:33, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Would have been really helpful if someone had expressed doubts about the truth of the article rather than just a lack of individual notability. --Michig (talk) 07:01, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Yea, I know. I didn't catch he was 15-years old until somebody mentioned it. I read what I wrote and it didn't come out right. Sorry for insinuating anything. I meant you should re-investigate the AfD because of the age information and it didn't come out that way. Again, I'm sorry. Bgwhite (talk) 07:34, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Question

A question on notability was asked at my talk page. I did a redirect of a band member to the band. Could you take a look at User talk:Bgwhite#Jeremiah Fraites and give your opinion. Bgwhite (talk) 23:03, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

The MST Land

Hello! It appears that I added project banners to the talk page for this article, at the same time that you were deleting the article! Therefore, the the talk page now exists, whereas the article does not. Could you please make sure that the talk page gets deleted as well? Thanks! Fortdj33 (talk) 20:33, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

No problem. Done. Thanks. --Michig (talk) 20:35, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

REGARDING Dakota (musician)

This article has been created, and used correctly following wiki's guidelines. It was created by myself who is a fan and wanted to give accurate details about their fellow Chicago artist. There are ACCURATE cites, yes all of which are blogs, but they are straight from the artists page or pages with notable credibility. This page has only been edited by one member because of the validity of the sources and to my knowledge, there is not much info that must be changed except minor edits. I have followed all of Wiki's guidelines, rules, and provided accurate and quality information that people have been searching the internet for. This page should NOT have been deleted. I will have more accurate information to provide. Please reconsider your decision. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheCANNON123 (talk • contribs) 16:47, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dakota (musician), it cannot be undeleted. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Michig (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.--Orange Mike | Talk 16:57, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Per the above, the decision to delete this article was reached by the community in the AfD discussion. The consensus there was unanimously in favour of deletion. Blogs are generally not accepted as sources and an article needs to be supported by sources that are considered reliable (see Wikipedia:Reliable sources). The relevant guideline that spells out generally accepted inclusion criteria for music-related subjects can be found at Wikipedia:Notability (music). For a relatively new artist who hasn't yet had commercial success, you will need to find examples of significant coverage in reliable sources (usually newspapers, print magazines, books, professional websites, etc.) for an article to be kept. I'm sorry that the article that you worked on has been deleted, and I hope it hasn't put you off contributing further. Please let me know if you have any further questions. Regards. --Michig (talk) 18:34, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank you, I will create a more reliable article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheCANNON123 (talk • contribs) 07:50, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Play Me Like A Violin

Hi plzz help me Play Me Like A Violin ---Joker-Syoma (talk) 20:18, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

I had a look for coverage but didn't find much. Sorry. --Michig (talk) 20:43, 29 November 2012 (UTC)