MichaelDalton

City of Melbourne Pipes and Drums

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as City of Melbourne Pipes and Drums, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.melbournepipeband.com/info.htm. As a copyright violation, City of Melbourne Pipes and Drums appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. City of Melbourne Pipes and Drums has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:City of Melbourne Pipes and Drums. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at City of Melbourne Pipes and Drums, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. -- Merope 20:02, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

File source problem with File:PatriciaAshley JustAnotherLostSoul.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:PatriciaAshley JustAnotherLostSoul.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:59, 8 March 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:59, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

UPDATE 3/10/2011: Email sent to permissions-en@wikimedia.org with permission from author to place this photo into public domain. David D'alessandro is the photographer and original copyright holder for this photo.

Nomination of City of Melbourne Pipes and Drums for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article City of Melbourne Pipes and Drums is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/City of Melbourne Pipes and Drums until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ostrichyearning (talk) 23:01, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Bjrnet

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Bjrnet, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be blatant advertising which only promotes or publicises a company, product, group or service. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Yeryry (talk) 12:24, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Contested deletion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --Bjrnet (talk) 12:31, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Sorry if this sounded promotional. I removed the links to my site. I just wanted to introduce myself.

June 2017

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

• Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
• Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:40, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

MichaelDalton (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

MichaelDalton (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

This is my real name. I've used username Bjrnet on Wikipedia for many years and have contributed from time to time and I believe those contributions are important and relevant. I agree that it is better to use my real name. Sorry for what appears promotional. It won't happen again. I am a known blackjack expert and published the magazine Blackjack Review in the 1990s. I am retired now and I don't make money from my Bjrnet site. I worked for NASA for over 30 years and I have a passion for the game of blackjack and card counting. I hope to contribute to Wikipedia in the future without sounding promotional.

Accept reason:

Renamed; understands COI issue. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 04:44, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

• I've done the rename - someone should review your request before too long. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:16, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
  • You do need to stop adding links to your own web site; that's simply not allowed here. Can you agree to that? --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 18:31, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

MichaelDalton (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #18543 was submitted on Jun 18, 2017 01:23:55. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 01:23, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Yes, I can agree to this. I understand now and agree I won't place links to my site.

File permission problem with File:PatriciaAshley ADemonWithin Premier.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:PatriciaAshley ADemonWithin Premier.jpg, which you've attributed to Patricia Ashley. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 08:21, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

I have instructed the owner of the photograph to draft an email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org to provide permission for the photograph. - Michael Dalton.

Nomination of Patricia Ashley for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Patricia Ashley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patricia Ashley until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 05:26, 25 December 2019 (UTC)