To Leave A New Comment Or Message, Click Here.
Signed ♣Mikey

Your New Article edit

Some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Michael Osmond Perry may not be sufficiently well-known to merit articles of their own. The Wikipedia community welcomes newcomers. On Wikipedia, all users are entitled to a user page in which they can describe themselves, and this article's content may be incorporated into that page. However, to merit inclusion in the encyclopedia proper, a subject must be notable, with reference to reliable published sources. We encourage you to write or improve articles on notable subjects. -FisherQueen 20:28, 1 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hey, FisherQueen. Just wanted to say that looking at your user page in 2007 was the first time I'd come in contact with another LGBTQ+ human being in a safe space. Although you were informing me the invalidity of the first page I'd created on Wikipedia, 'twas nice to come upon another queer person. - Michael Perry 8:21, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Regarding your edit to Michael Osmond Perry: edit

Your recent edit to Michael Osmond Perry (diff) was reverted by automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses, phone numbers, YouTube, Geocities, Myspace, Facebook, blog, or forum links to a page. Please note that such links are generally to be avoided. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II 21:41, 1 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

You have recently recreated or reposted material which previously was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies at Michael Osmond Perry. Please do not recreate this article without prior approval from an administrator or you may be blocked from editing. We ask that you respect what Wikipedia is not. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may seek an independent deletion review. -FisherQueen 22:11, 1 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Please refrain from creating inappropriate pages such as Michael 'Mikey' Perry. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. -FisherQueen 22:12, 1 January 2007 (UTC)Reply


I'm Sorry edit

I Am very sorry about the Michael 'Mikey' Perry and michael Osmond Perry article incident. I did not know that there was a criteria for aricles on people, places and things (nouns). Well I guess i'll stick to trying to help expand articles which meet the criteria. S, May i get a copy of the Michael Osmond Perry article so that I may paste it into my user article? Thank you for your help. Why did some one send me a message saying that I am a fool and I tagged my own article for Speedy Deletion? I mean, I was not aware of it? I just copied and pasted one of my previous articles into it. If this is the way Wikipedia deals with mistakes, there is a need for a discovery of new interactive methods.

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Michael_Osmond_Perry"

To get a copy of the article, contact an administrator. This should help. The person who called you a fool was not being very polite... when you copied your article, you also copied the code placed to have it deleted, thus saving other editors the trouble of tagging it for deletion. We're glad to have you around, and lots of people make a few missteps while they're learning their way around, then stay to make Wikipedia wonderful. -FisherQueen 12:07, 2 January 2007 (UTC)Reply


Regarding Unopened messages edit

Is There a way that unopened (last chance) messages may also be retrieved? Like in a history of some sort?

I'm not positive that I understand the question... if you mean messages on an article's talk page that has been deleted, administrators have access to deleted material. -FisherQueen 22:43, 2 January 2007 (UTC)Reply


What's my Role?.....Exactly edit

Hey, what exactly is the role I should play here @ Wiki? I guess the Headline is sel-explanitary.

That's entirely up to you... there are lots of different ways to get involved at Wikipedia, both in creating and editing articles, and in all the maintenance tasks. I started at the Community Portal, which has a section that lists lots of tasks that need working on, and discovered that I enjoyed patrolling recent changes and wikifying pages. If you check out the Community Portal, it'll give you a taste of some of the different jobs Wikipedia editors do, and you can see which ones appeal to you. I don't know everything- I learn as I go- but I'm happy to answer what questions I can. Have fun! -FisherQueen (Talk) 13:21, 4 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

It's Me Again.....Yea edit

Hey, about the Michael Osmond Perry article. My friends and "management" are trying to get a recording contract with a big company by the end of the year. When I become famous, may I be the one to do the article on myself? I hope it's not considered as vandalism if I entered my birth into the birth section of the article for the date April 9 because I did.

No, Wikipedia strongly discourages writing about yourself or your company because it is a Conflict of interest which makes it very difficult to write a neutral article. When you're famous and well-known, someone else will create an article about you. -FisherQueen (Talk) 22:17, 21 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
Yea Thanks!!!!!!!!

RE: Do I Know You? edit

In response to your post on my talk page, I have never taught at Antigua Grammar School, nor have I ever been to Antigua, or Montreal, but wouldn't mind visiting either. By the way, please sign your comment next time. Thank you. - cgilbert(talk|contribs) 20:59, 1 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Unspecified source for Image:MariahShades.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:MariahShades.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:35, 5 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Spangineerws (háblame) 19:35, 5 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for responding. On Wikipedia, only administrators can delete pages and images, so that's why you couldn't figure out how to do it. However, I've taken care of it. If you're successful in getting an image that meets Wikipedia's requirements for addition (basically, that it is licensed in such a way that anyone can use it for any purpose, so long as the author is credited), please upload it. If you have any other questions related to images or anything else on Wikipedia, don't hesitate to ask. Have a great day! --Spangineerws (háblame) 20:14, 5 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Appropriate image licensing edit

Unfortunately, it's usually not as easy as finding a site online that says "you can use this picture on your website". Wikipedia's goal is to create an encyclopedia that can be converted into any format and used for anything—not just for personal use, and not just online. Thus, to be eligible, all content must be licensed by the creator with a license like the CC-BY-SA (see [1] for the basics). If it just says "you can use this", that's not good enough. It gets rather complicated, so the easiest thing is to take your own pictures, and license them with that license, and then upload them to Wikipedia. --Spangineerws (háblame) 00:53, 6 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Article "Are an admisnistrator?" edit

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia by creating the page Are an admisnistrator?. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --EarthPerson 21:23, 10 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

(Replied on both) No problem. Just leave it as is and it will get deleted by an admin. Cheers.--EarthPerson 21:29, 10 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Question about image licensing edit

I would say to check Wikipedia:Media copyright questions - I'm not the most knowledgable about images, but they can answer it for you. I believe that the objects in the photos are still of copyrighted items. --EarthPerson 21:55, 10 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Since You're Watching My Talk Page, Thanks For The Advice. When Will My Question Be Answered? Are You An Administrator? What Does One Have To Do To Become An Administartor? Is It Dependent On How Many Corrections Made To Articles? Is It Dependent On How One Displays Himself (Behavior,etc.)?--Mikey 22:11, 10 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Response to question at Media copyright questions: No, that wasn't an appropriate license. Although it's great that you actually took the picture, the reason you took the picture was to display such information contained in the image that is copyrighted (packaging, logos, artwork, etc) and thus is a derivative work. You need to immediately change all the licenses from "public domain" to use {{Non-free fair use in}} (and give the article you are using it in) and then write a rationale explaining why the image is copyrighted (the logo, artwork). See WP:FURG for help with that.

To answer your question about admins: to become an admin, you can request it or be nominated by another at WP:RFA. However, you have been here for ~3.5 months and would most certainly fail a RFA attempt. 6 months is a good minimum time. There are links at that page as for what some look for and will probably answer many of your questions about adminship. Remember: adminship is nothing special, it is not a prize or honor. Behavior is largely looked at, as well as knowledge of Wikipedia, policies and contributions. Edit count, once you get to a thousand or two is meaningless. Welcome to WP! MECUtalk 18:04, 11 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Just a friendly reminder... edit

When you are editing articles or creating image descriptions, please remember that not every letter needs to be capitalized (example: in the article Digicel). I went ahead and edited that article, but this is just a reminder for future edits. Thanks, HumanZoom 00:13, 11 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

5 octaves edit

Do you really have five octaves? How high can you go? Orane (talkcont.) 02:59, 13 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Well, I once once recorded myself go up to G7, but there were times when I went as high as F8 but that was last year. Right now, my voice is not as great as it used to be and I need lots of rest and warm up to do this.--Mikey 14:50, 14 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned fair use image (Image:B'dayDeluxe2Discs.JPG) edit

Thanks for uploading Image:B'dayDeluxe2Discs.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:33, 11 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:B'dayDeluxe2Discs.JPG edit

Hello, MicP. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:B'dayDeluxe2Discs.JPG) was found at the following location: User:MicP/Gallery. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 01:24, 14 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:CeCeWinansPurifiedCD.JPG edit

Hello, MicP. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:CeCeWinansPurifiedCD.JPG) was found at the following location: User:MicP/Gallery. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 20:02, 15 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:DigicelTopUpSign.JPG edit

Hello, MicP. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:DigicelTopUpSign.JPG) was found at the following location: User:MicP/Gallery. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 00:33, 16 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for Image:LatoyaJacksonsmile.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:LatoyaJacksonsmile.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:09, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

MySpace edit

Contrary to your belief, images added to MySpace do not automatically become public domain. From their terms of service: "After posting your Content to the MySpace Services, you continue to retain all ownership rights in such Content, and you continue to have the right to use your Content in any way you choose." This means that whoever uploads the photos has the rights to use the images, not whoever views it. Metros 13:18, 1 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

re: DID U CREATE ALL THE TRACK LISTING ARTICLES FOR GOOD GIRL GONE BAD? edit

Did you look at the page histories at all? I nominated them all for deletion. - eo 11:21, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

MY Bad...I Looked @ The Histories and they ALL had u on them as the last to edit. Unfortunately, I was very tired and so I had poor judgement. I'm sorry for the inconvenience.--MikeyT 17:43, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Random Smiley Award edit

 
For your contributions to Wikipedia and humanity in general, you are hereby granted the coveted Random Smiley Award
originated by Pedia-I
(Explanation and Disclaimer)

Tom@sBat 22:07, 9 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks & Have A Great Day!!!--Mikéylicious & Really, Really Hot!!! 16:43, 13 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Shake It Off edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Shake It Off, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Extraordinary Machine 23:16, 27 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (Image:CeCeWinansPurifiedCD.JPG) edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:CeCeWinansPurifiedCD.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:14, 18 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

January 2008 edit

  Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Mariah Carey's eleventh studio album. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 00:26, 12 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Your message on Jimbo's talk page edit

Hi MicP,

Sorry about removing your post from User talk:Jimbo Wales, but considering it had some personal information in it (specifically, your IP address and name), I figured it would be better to err on the side of caution and take it off of the highly-trafficked page.

It seems you've run into a bit of collateral damage from an IP block--specifically, an IP range block. I notice from looking at User talk:76.69.165.83 that you're taking care of it, but I just thought I'd stop by and explain a little bit more about what happened.

A range block refers to the practice of blocking a swath of IP addresses all at once. This is usually done in instances where a given internet service provider assigns its users dynamic IPs that change every time they log on--one user can have a dozen IP addresses in as many minutes. Needless to say, it's impossible to block one of these users when they decide to cause trouble, and so sometimes the only option is to block every IP address they could potentially use. Since the consequences of such a block can be enormous and affect thousands of potential editors, they are considered a last resort and are usually done in such a way that users with registered accounts (like yourself) can still edit like normal. So don't worry about it--the block wasn't targeted at your user account, and you can still browse Wikipedia without logging in or edit while logged in. And once the block expires, everything will be back to normal.

I hope this answers your question! --jonny-mt 01:30, 4 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thank You. Yes It did answer my question. I think I will disconnect from my network connection and reconnect. Maybe, just maybe, the address will change.---¤÷(`[¤*M*¤]´)÷¤- (talk) 01:41, 4 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I'm glad to hear that helped, but you should be able to edit just fine even with your IP address blocked. I wouldn't worry about it--just go have fun on the wiki! --jonny-mt 01:47, 4 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Ok...---¤÷(`[¤*M*¤]´)÷¤- 01:49, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Meetup/Montreal edit

I see you are a user located in Montréal, you may be interested in: Wikipedia:Meetup/Montreal. Please add your name to the "Interested" or to the "Not interested" list. Date is set for May 3rd 2008 and Buffet La Stanza is the proposed location. If you have another idea for the location; propose away! Please pass on to any Montreal Wikis you may be aware of and who are not yet listed as interested, may be interested, or not interested. Pro bug catcher (talkcontribs). 04:39, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Demo edit

I don't know anyone in the area who does this sort of thing. I was in bands for years in England, and although I never made it big I did at least see the process. Best to talk at the meetup, I think, if we can both manage to go - it's a better venue for such discussions anyway. Failing that, you can contact me by email if you wish. Good luck! Walkerma (talk) 04:58, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

k---¤÷(`[¤*M*¤]´)÷¤- 17:32, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (Image:ITunesStore.png) edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:ITunesStore.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:37, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I uploaded that version of the picture and realized I uploaded the wrong one. I uploaded the preferred version and wanted to delete the version in question, but since only administrators can delete pictures, I could not.---¤÷(`[¤*M*¤]´)÷¤- 21:54, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:ITunesStoreWithoutWindowFeatures.png edit

I have tagged Image:ITunesStoreWithoutWindowFeatures.png as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. –Dream out loud (talk) 23:40, 31 March 2008 (UTC) It is being used in an article...see iTunes Store---¤÷(`[¤*M*¤]´)÷¤- 22:53, 1 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

iTunes Store screenshot edit

Please stop changing the screenshot image in the infobox for the iTunes Store article. The image you uploaded, Image:ITunesStoreWithoutWindowFeatures.png, is of way too high resolution and violates Wikipedia's non-free image policies and is considered to be a copyright violation. The image Image:ITunes Store screenshot.png is an acceptable resolution for Wikipedia, and a copyrighted screenshot should not appear any larger than that. –Dream out loud (talk) 15:23, 2 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Well, if it's any constellation, I can lower the resolution. We need to be as recent as possible...---¤÷(`[¤*M*¤]´)÷¤- 21:52, 2 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hey Look at the E=mc2 page..... edit

It has this ("The album leaked onto various peer to peer sharing sites on April 6th, 2008.") Under the singles section..I think that article should be locked due to vandalism.Sivart7555 (talk) 03:48, 8 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Update - Looks Like it has been Removed, I don't know how to do it, but "Bye Bye" should be added to her singles discography list.Sivart7555 (talk) 03:58, 8 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

I Just Added It---¤÷(`[¤*M*¤]´)÷¤- 21:43, 8 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia talk:Meetup/Montreal#Time? edit

No need to bring your aunt, this is not a bar, but a family restaurant. Peter Horn 20:34, 30 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of El-A-Kru edit

 

An article that you have been involved in editing, El-A-Kru, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/El-A-Kru. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Voceditenore (talk) 05:59, 15 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Mariah edit

Hi, could you provide me with a reliable source for mariah being called the queen of pop and I will happily help write a strong paragraph for/with you. — Realist2 17:31, 13 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

With Pleasure---¤÷(`[¤*M*¤]´)÷¤- 17:33, 13 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
Cheers, if you can show me a reliable source that works I'm more than willing to work on this to prevent further edit warring. — Realist2 17:38, 13 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
Here's the source. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,353538,00.html

I did "Provide...a reliable source for Mariah being called the queen of pop." Now that I have, it would be very nice if you would fulfill your part of the agreement and, "happily help write a strong paragraph for/with" ME.---¤÷(`[¤*M*¤]´)÷¤- 17:52, 13 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

OK, all good, you need to make sure you use reliable sources, avoid using wikipedia or crappy online sites. ou can tell an online source isn't reliable just by looking at the cite. Everything that is there now is good. Feel free to add more but use reliable sources and you will be fine. — Realist2 17:54, 13 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
Merci!---¤÷(`[¤*M*¤]´)÷¤- 18:01, 13 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

There is no need for that huge hidden notice, stop pushing a pov, also when you are making huge changes can you do them in smaller pieces please, with edit summaries. — Realist2 01:51, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hmmmk.---¤÷(`[¤*M*¤]´)÷¤- 01:58, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
Also, why do you keep reverting to older versions? The artists should be placed in alphabetical order.---¤÷(`[¤*M*¤]´)÷¤- 02:03, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
OK, I agree, but we wait for talk page consensus. — Realist2 02:23, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

June 2009 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Obsessed (Mariah Carey Song). When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

I suspect you want the article deleted. Since you are not the page creator, you should go through a deletion process to have it deleted, such as proposed deletion if you think the deletion is uncontroversial, or Articles for Deletion otherwise. -- Blanchardb -MeMyEarsMyMouth- timed 01:50, 11 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Obsessed edit

I don't know why Mariah Daily is reporting false info (except that it's a fansite, and there are reasons we don't permit fansites as sources), but here's the link to Billboard: http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/esearch/searchResult.jsp?exp=y&Ne=4&inert=25&Ntt=obsessed&Ntk=Keyword&Ntx=mode+matchallpartial&nor=10&an=bbcom&N=37#pos25

Obsessed is on the Bubbling Under Hot 100, not the Hot 100.—Kww(talk) 02:33, 16 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (File:DigicelTopUpSign.JPG) edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:DigicelTopUpSign.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ZooFari 21:15, 2 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

You're invited! edit

Hello, MicP,

You are invited meet with your fellow Wikipedians by attending the Montréal meetup scheduled on Sunday, June 27, 2010; between 1500 - 1700 to be held at the Comité Social Centre Sud (CSCS), located at 1710 Beaudry, in Montréal. You can sign up at the meetup page.

The meetup is happening in concurrence with RoCoCo 2010, a free, bilingual, weekend unconference including many people involved with Wikis both within the Wikipedia/Wikimedia Community and abroad. You do not need to attend the conference to sign up for the Wikimeetup, but you are certainly welcome! Bastique ☎ call me!

(PS: Please share this with those you know who might not be on the delivery list, i.e. Users in Montreal/Quebec)

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) 00:47, 8 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Sorry. I'd been so inactive recently. Hadn't seen this. When's the 2020 meetup happening?

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, MicP. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, MicP. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, MicP. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for October 10 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited If You Should Ever Be Lonely, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heartbreaker. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 10 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply