Mhakcm
|
Regarding your editing edit
Please be careful with your editing. You are randomly removing certain words from the article as seen here. Please make sure that you are not editing with keyword-based content-control software installed. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:51, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
Talkback edit
Message added 23:47, 19 August 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
August 2011 edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Islamic sexual jurisprudence, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ~ AdvertAdam talk 16:20, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Saw your note on the Twinkle talk page edit
Saw the note that you posted over at Wikipedia talk:Twinkle. It would seem that you may not have selected the best venue for your comment, since, while I applaud the effort, you posted on the talk page for a user script rather than an article, and so your comment most likely will not reach its intended audience. It would appear that you've edited a few pages related to Islam, as you mentioned in the comment on the Twinkle page. What article were you referring to with your comment? SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:40, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Talkback edit
Message added 23:22, 22 August 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
SchuminWeb (Talk) 23:22, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Talkback edit
Message added 06:51, 24 August 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Talkback edit
Message added 15:01, 24 August 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Talkback edit
Message added 18:11, 24 August 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
SchuminWeb (Talk) 18:11, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
Muhammad Hamidullah edit
I noticed you reverted to article to 6 April version on the basis of copyright infringement I can not see how it can all be such and why you have taken such a drastic action rather than remove suspected infringement. I noticed you or others have done this before on the same reasoning.
I am new to this and you will no doubt have access to what I have done on which articles etc., which I think is not bad for a newcomer even if I say so myself.
However you are probably not aware of the significance of this article in the Muslim community (1.5 billion+) as the person is renowned and as you can see from the various sources very accomplished. I note you too are interested in languages from your profile, but I do not think you can compare to Hamidullah.
Although I can see some sentences may have been copied from some sources by past editors, or slightly altered, most of the source websites do hot have a copyright issue with things being taken from them and are religious propagatory in nature allowing free use or replication of their content.
I am going to restore the article (and make a few changes to re-express things so that there is less chance of infringement) as I think the significance of the man is too great to not have on Wikipedia. I will of course take into account any comments and suggestions you may have. Mhakcm (talk) 10:51, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
- Hi. Generally I answer these kinds of questions at my talk page, but I felt that it was urgent enough that you get this message before engaging the article for me to respond to you here. I need to caution you that restoring copyright infringements to Wikipedia may result in your account being sanctioned. It is Wikipedia's policy to delete content that violates any copyrights. You are certainly welcome to add information about the man, even drawing from the same source that has been copied and pasted now multiple times, but you must do so in accordance with our copyright policies. (See Wikipedia:Copy-paste.) This is not a matter of a "few changes", which would create an unusable derivative work, but rather a complete rewrite.
- The importance of the subject is immaterial here. This is a simple question of one of the legal policies governing Wikipedia, and I'm afraid that we must enforce it. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 10:56, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Another talkback edit
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
~ AdvertAdam talk 21:31, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Your high handed approach! edit
I have just logged into wiki after a few weeks and surprised at your accusations of vandalism and threats of banning without full analysis and based on assumptions which considering you say you are a lawyer and erudite one, you should know innocent mistakes and culpability of someone when there is no Mens Rea. It is not called for, and what's more it reflects badly on you especially with your background, and is more suggestive of your ego. As you may have gathered if you bothered to read the relevant parts relating to me that I am new to this Wiki editing and unlike some of you out there, do not spend half my life reading or editing it - just have too many other commitments! The amendment I made to "your" article that you did not agree with are (1) it is my reading of the reported quote else where, you may differ, but I have no objection if you revert it as it is minor (2)the other change done at 06.06 on 6th Sept. I feel is fully justified and contributes to the artcle.Mhakcm (talk) 11:48, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 26 edit
Hi. When you recently edited T Venkattram Reddy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Telugu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
Regarding edits in Hyderabad, India edit
While most of your edits in Hyderabad, India are good and welcome, some edits may be not entirely appropriate. As an example, in this edit, you removed an entire collection of sources (book sources), replacing them with this low quality source.
The article is getting ready for a likely FAC. So, please do not do major changes without discussing it in the article's talk page. Once again, your edits have been quite good and useful. But some of them not quite so... Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 06:18, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
- Did you check those books in the pages mentioned. As of now, I could retrieve only one of the books —The Colors of Violence: Cultural Identities, Religion, and Conflict By Sudhir Kakar. On page 23 of that book, Bhagmati and her love affair with teh sultan has been described. I do not see any error in that. And such books are much more academically reliable than random websites.--Dwaipayan (talk) 06:36, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
- In fact, I could retrieve appropriate pages of the two other books as well. And all of them supported the Sultan's affair with Bhagmati, and the theory of origin of the name from her name. So, no problem in these references. I have re-instated those 3 references in the article. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 06:42, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
- I had open a discussion on Article talk page Here, Lets discuss there first for any concerns related to History.--Omer123hussain (talk) 21:12, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
- In fact, I could retrieve appropriate pages of the two other books as well. And all of them supported the Sultan's affair with Bhagmati, and the theory of origin of the name from her name. So, no problem in these references. I have re-instated those 3 references in the article. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 06:42, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
Dowry edits edit
Please stop disruptive edits, see dowry [talk page]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LukeNancy (talk • contribs) 20:54, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 15 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dower, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Talaq (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
January 2014 edit
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to William Charles (judge) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- 2014, appointing him as Vice-President of the Court of Protection, for a three-year term.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed124693</ref>
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:48, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
The Tudors of Penmynydd edit
Hi there! This goes back some time! Thanks. Why not leave your amendments / requests on the Talk page? Llywelyn2000 (talk) 16:27, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 14 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chaand Nagpaul, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page GMC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Draft:Priya Parker, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://priyaparker.com/bio.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:14, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- I have verified this match and deleted the above page. MER-C 13:08, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
October 2014 edit
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Gospel of Basilides may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- James A. Kelhoffer}}</ref>)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:26, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Gospel of Basilides edit
Hi, I've brought our dispute regarding the Gospel of Basilides here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Books#The_Gospel_of_Basilides_-_or_on_the_contents_of_a_non-existing_book. Please see if you can give a positive contribution to the discussion. Best regards,Jeff5102 (talk) 08:48, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Your recent edits edit
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
or 
) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Disambiguation link notification for August 31 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Islamic view of Jesus' death, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hippolytus and Clement. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit
Hello, Mhakcm. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit
Hello, Mhakcm. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit
Hello, Mhakcm. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 14 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cranbrook School, Kent, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrew Roberts (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit
| | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Disambiguation link notification for June 3 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abdul Latif Jameel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FBK (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:14, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit
| | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit
| | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:13, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Averment (June 17) edit
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Averment and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Mhakcm!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 12:31, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
|
June 2023 edit
Hello, I'm PritongKandule. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sexuality in Islam have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. PritongKandule-✉️📝 06:36, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for contacting me through this page. I saw you took off the edit I made on the basis that it was not referenced and you now say it was not constructive. I have to agree that I cannot present a citation, however it is constructive, rational, and logical that if a statement is made about the mouth's function are for noble attributes but ignoring that the same organ can be used for ignoble attributes e.g. cursing, swearing, or through which vomit flows is contrary to the stance taken by scholar quoted, who says mouth is used for recitation and remembrance of God and should not be polluted by sexual activity using it on genitals. Do you see the point I'm making? Please advise how I can put this into the article as you are more experienced because it is highly relevant. Unless of course you are an apologist for that sheik and you feel that any other view is incorrect. I would then rebut this by the following statement by one of the greatest Muslim scholars of the previous century [Dr Muhammed Hamidullah (cf)] whose opinion in a speech on this matter was that all things that have been prohibited has been revealed to us by the Qur'an and Ahadith; anything else we must exercise our intellect to determine the correct answer. Therefore anything which is not mentioned in the Qur'an and Ahadith is permitted unless there is some other reason to ban it. So for example cigarette smoking cannot be said to be banned by Islam, wrong, or sinful (I am aware some say it is) even though we know it does harm, it can only be that it is discouraged or not recommended. I hope you get my point! Mhakcm (talk) 20:47, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Averment edit
Hello, Mhakcm. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Averment, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:05, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Marriage & Civil Partnership (Minimum Age) Act 2022 edit
Hello, Mhakcm. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Marriage & Civil Partnership (Minimum Age) Act 2022, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:05, 29 November 2023 (UTC)