Welcome! edit

Hello, Mglovesfun, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Soo 17:57, 30 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Manual of Style edit

In particular, read this! Soo

Your article, Bingo (Scrabble), was selected for DYK! edit

  On July 4, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bingo (Scrabble), which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Thanks for your contributions! ++Lar: t/c 15:25, 4 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Five tool player category edit

I have clarified the intent of the five tool player category and explained my rationale at the CfD page you created. This may not change your opinion of the matter, but I felt it best to notify you of the change. Erechtheus 00:18, 30 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Its easy to revert! edit

I noticed your message on the talk page for Fog - it's great you care but did you know you can do this yourself? It's dead easy. Basically all you need to do is click on history. This bring up a list of old versions of the article. Once you are sure you have found one before the vandalism just click on the date/time of that article which will bring up a view of the article at that time. Then click edit, add a useful edit summary (e.g. revert vandalism) and click save. That's all! If you have more questions see: Wikipedia:Revert and for more on vandalism Wikipedia:Vandalism or ask me at User talk:NHSavage. Happy vandal fighting!--NHSavage 22:42, 10 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

AfD Nomination: Graham Nash (Countdown) edit

I've nominated the article Graham Nash (Countdown) for deletion under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Graham Nash (Countdown) satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. I have explained why in the nomination space (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graham Nash (Countdown) . Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them. You are free to edit the content of Graham Nash (Countdown) during the discussion, but please do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top). Doing so will not end the discussion. — Swpb talk contribs 21:06, 30 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

AfD Nomination: Julian Fell edit

I've nominated the article Julian Fell for deletion under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Julian Fell satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. I have explained why in the nomination space (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julian Fell . Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them. You are free to edit the content of Julian Fell during the discussion, but please do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top). Doing so will not end the discussion. — Swpb talk contribs 21:06, 30 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

AfD Nomination: Chris Wills edit

I've nominated the article Chris Wills for deletion under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Chris Wills satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. I have explained why in the nomination space (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Wills . Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them. You are free to edit the content of Chris Wills during the discussion, but please do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top). Doing so will not end the discussion. — Swpb talk contribs 21:07, 30 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

AfD Nomination: Ben Wilson (Countdown) edit

I've nominated the article Ben Wilson (Countdown) for deletion under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Ben Wilson (Countdown) satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. I have explained why in the nomination space (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Wilson (Countdown) . Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them. You are free to edit the content of Ben Wilson (Countdown) during the discussion, but please do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top). Doing so will not end the discussion. — Swpb talk contribs 21:07, 30 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Articles for deletion - thoughts edit

I think it was a fair shout to nominates these for deletion as they do come close to the notable/non notable line. However I opposed the deletion as the articles are factual with souces to back them up. There are 1.57 million articles on Wikipedia and there are some very non-notable ones that don't get deleted. Surely the job of Wikipedia is to expand people knowledge, which is why I opposed the deletion. It would be one thing to put just any old game show contestant on here, but when you're talking about a Grand Champion who's had 12 or more appearances, I see no harm in writing an article on it, and it seems like the administrators agree. Mglovesfun 20:23, 13 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thumbnail sizes edit

Special:Preferences, Files tab. Soo 19:14, 16 February 2007 (UTC)Reply


Answers.com and Wikipedia edit

[1] Answers.com actually copies from Wikipedia, not the other way round. Christopher Connor 16:21, 27 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Scra3.jpg listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Scra3.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 00:14, 27 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for Image:Scrabfr2.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Scrabfr2.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:13, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:ISCexample.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading Image:ISCexample.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:23, 13 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Trivia debate edit

Could you please spend a moment to add your 2 cents to Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not#Sections vs. collections and also Wikipedia:Requested moves#September 12, 2007? I think that you had strong opinions on this matter on Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Template:Trivia. I understand that you are in favour of trivia on Wikipedia, but I may be mistaken. I am the direct opposite, but in the interest of community consensus I'm letting you know of these two pages where debate is continuing. - Ta bu shi da yu 08:48, 14 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (Image:ISCexample.jpg) edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:ISCexample.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:34, 24 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

I've actually already asked that this image be deleted, but thanks anyway. Mglovesfun 12:19, 25 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Dwain Chambers edit

I saw you listed Dwain Chambers as one of your favourite athletes. I've taken the article to the WP:FAC to try to get it to a featured article status. Could you have a look over the article and add any comments or suggestions HERE? Thanks. Sillyfolkboy (talk) 12:56, 20 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Unreferenced BLPs edit

  Hello Mglovesfun! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 944 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Ben Wilson (Countdown) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:32, 17 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi Martin! edit

Hello, I hope you're doing fine and I sincerely apologize for this intrusion. Since you're interested in languages I thought you might help us... I'm a member of an association "Amical de la Viquipèdia" which is trying to get some recognition as a Catalan Chapter but this hasn't been approved up to this moment. We would appreciate your support, visible if you stick this on your first page: Wikimedia CAT. Thanks again, wishing you a great summer, take care and may the force be with you so you can win all your scrabble contests! Capsot (talk) 15:59, 7 June 2010 (UTC)Reply


Articles for deletion nomination of Ben Wilson (Countdown) edit

I have nominated Ben Wilson (Countdown), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Wilson (Countdown) (3rd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. je deckertalk 04:58, 31 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Refresh page edit

 Template:Refresh page has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji 02:11, 6 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Unreferenced BLPs edit

Hi there, Similar to the previous messages you've received about UBLPs, I came across Hervé Bohbot today, a French scrabble player article that you created many moons ago. Is he notable enough? Do you know of any suitable reliable sources? Could you help out with any more of these too? Thanks, The-Pope (talk) 00:19, 12 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

I almost never edit here anymore; it probably isn't an includable article, feel free to afd it. --Mglovesfun (talk) 12:28, 12 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

August 2011 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article John Maconnachie, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. GiantSnowman 12:16, 1 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

I asked his son (that is, my maternal grandfather). It's 'reliable' although not 'demonstrable', that is I can't show anyone else. Mglovesfun (talk) 22:04, 1 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for October 10 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kairomone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coinage (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 10 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Contestant for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Contestant, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Contestant until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 8 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Damian Eadie edit

 

The article Damian Eadie has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:ENTERTAINER. Cannot find any reliable and independent sources supporting WP:CREATIVE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Justiyaya 16:55, 11 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Damian Eadie for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Damian Eadie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Damian Eadie until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Justiyaya 14:00, 12 March 2022 (UTC)Reply