You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Iraq War. -Darouet (talk) 17:03, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- What unsourced edits did you mean? --Methylcarbinol (talk) 18:11, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- My edits included reliable sources but the previous version of the changed sentence has no link on any sources. Also, it contradicted to the facts about "chemical weapons that had been discovered in Iraq" which were mentioned under 'Poison gas' subheading. Please change that obsolete sentence which is often used by trolls from Savushkin Street.--Methylcarbinol (talk) 18:25, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you for explaining your edits, Methylcarbinol. Unfortunately, both are probematic. The first [1] undid a community decision to restrict the article's scope to the conflict from 2003-11. You can view that decision here.
- The second edit [2] overthrows a longstanding consensus by wikipedia editors, journalists and scholars that most WMD claims proved false after the invasion of Iraq. This has been discussed numerous times, and you can view some of these discussions in the archives of Iraq War talk page: [3], [4], [5].
- @Methylcarbinol: if you have further comments, please make a new section and list your concerns at Talk:Iraq War. -Darouet (talk) 18:40, 19 September 2016 (UTC)