User talk:Metagraph/May 15 - June 15
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Re: Pavlov
Done - and I've added a few more Pavlovas to the list too :) Grutness...wha? 12:37, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
May 2008
You have gotten me confused now. I did mean to reply to you for your message left on my talk page. I have reverted my edit on One-hit wonder. I think it was a reply meant to you, as far as I know. This is what happens when I stay up all night working on Wikipedia. I'm sorry if I'm inconveniencing you. --- Mr. E. Sánchez Wanna know my story?/ Share yours with me! 07:03, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you for your understanding and for not starting a revert war. Have fun editing! Thanks! Mr. E. Sánchez Wanna know my story?/ Share yours with me! 07:06, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks, but...
If a talk page entry has nothing to do with the article or makes no sense...it will be deleted. -Sukecchi (talk) 11:37, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
Shotokan karate
Thanks for using the Shotokan karate box I created. You can change the background color to match your belt by adding |#630 to the end. Take a look at my page for an example. [User:Drmadskills|Drmadskills]] (talk) 18:20, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
I began karate in January 2006. I'm 1st kyu as well now and I'm hoping I will be able to take my shodan exam in December of this year. Kindest, Drmadskills (talk) 13:25, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
Vandalism?
ur claiming that stating Russell Crowe as a new zealand-australian is vandalism. You could have edited it back i wouldnt have cared but sending me a message about vadalism is stupid. Your a dickhead, Crowe is an Aussie might i add...and it was sourced. He lived in NZ for 4 years till he moved to Aus. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Steve76859 (talk • contribs) 02:06, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- No, i warned you because there was an active discussion going on and we don't need people sockpuppetting and changing the article. You know what you did was wrong, and calling me a dickhead isn't solving anything. Sockpuppetting is against the rules, Vandalism is too, and editing without NPOV is also bad. Iv also written more on your talk page, but this is a message here for all the people reading this and wondering what iv done. Metagraph comment
Trivia
Thanks for the assistance. Could you perhaps tell TapOut 013 a bit more indepth?—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 05:43, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Battle of Strasbourg
The reason I didn't write summaries is because I was not editing this article, but writing it (it was a 2-paragraph stub when I started on it). There seems little point in adding edit summaries when you're not changing anything but simply expanding, since the new text is its own summary. Also, I'm not sure I like this threat of formal warnings: it seems inappropriate when you are dealing with people that are contributing their time and effort for free. Warnings etc are only appropriate when you are paying people to do work for you. EraNavigator (talk) 21:44, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Attack on Ryulong?
Whoa, whoa, whoa, you thought I was attacking him? I was just saying my opinion! I didn't mean to attack anyone. But still, sorry for attacking. SAVIOR_SELF.777 07:05, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
The user was blocked for the vandalism to Sydney and for their persistent abuse of their talk page and mine. It was clear that the user was not the Newbie they claimed to be and that their only intention was to vandalize. Gwernol 14:44, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
- Oh and regarding the blanking of their talk page, users are permitted to remove warnings from their tlak page, but IPs may not remove comments of other users nor are they permitted to remove the whois tag since these pages are shared by multiple users. Gwernol 14:46, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Request For Rollback
Done. Please see WP:RBK or feel free to ask me if you need any help with the tool (or for anything else!). Happy editing! Pedro : Chat 10:15, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
June 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Xbox Live has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. ukexpat (talk) 03:43, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Sorry that was an error using the vandalism tool. – ukexpat (talk) 03:47, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Please do not make test edits to articles, as you did with this edit to Emma, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits constitute vandalism, and will be reverted. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thanks. NeilN talk ♦ contribs 05:01, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Revert to my contribution
Could you please explain to me how the edit on Destroy All Humans! Path of the Furon was unconstructive? I was simply adding some more text that would give more information and help the part I was editing to make sense. I never meant for anything to become out of place, or add any speculation or such. --SWJS: The All Knowing Destroy All Humans! Nerd(Cortex Scan) 08:19, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- It's quite alright, I just wanted to know for sure. Usually My grammar and spelling are top notch, must have been one of my off days. Thank you anyway. --SWJS: The All Knowing Destroy All Humans! Nerd(Cortex Scan) 18:20, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Sydney Kings
I just wanna clear the fact that, until now, Sydney Kings are still the only team to win 3 consecutive NBL championships. If you like to put Sydney were the 1st team to win 3 in a row, then who were the 2nd team? I think the right sentence should be Sydney Kings are the only team to win 3 consecutive NBL championships. And that will remain until another team can repeat that feat.
Cheers 203.28.214.36 (talk) 01:04, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- I have no idea what you mean by "vandalism" on my edit. If you believe it has not cited or no reference then just take a look at the National Basketball League (Australia). I'm sure you will see that the statement (which is, Sydney Kings are the only team to win 3 consecutive NBL championships) I put up there is true, and not by any mean of "vandalism" from your own food of thought. Thanks 203.28.214.36 (talk) 07:05, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
Incredible Hulk reverts
Unless it's obvious vandalism, I think you should explain the reason for reverts. Note all these comments on your talk page asking "Why did you do this?". It's like stiffing the waitress. The More You Know ...
| | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |