User talk:MelbourneStar/Archive 30

Archive 25

←

Archive 28

Archive 29

Archive 30

Archive 31

Archive 32

→

Archive 35

Editing Lobsang Tanzin

Dear Melbournestar,

Given my last amateurish attempt at editing pages on Wikpedia,I have come up with some credible data and sources for the same. It would be great if you could have a look at it. I will need your expert advice at this.

I have the data in a word doc. I am not sure how to share it with you. Please let me know if I could send it to you in a mail or if you have any other suggestion.

Regards, Sid5926 (talk) 06:53, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Hi there @Sid5926: feel free to copy-and-paste the contents of the word document into an email to myself or on the article's talk page if you'd like. We'll then go over things from there. Kind regards —MelbourneStar☆^talk 06:59, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Hi @MelbourneStar: I tried copying the data, but am unable to insert pics. Please let me know if I could send the document some way. RegardsSid5926 (talk) 06:25, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Texas 17 Feb 19 Mullah Omar

Melbourne Star, thank you for the respectful response reference our edit on Mullah Omar's page. We would like to make contact outside of Wikipedia and receive your guidance and feedback in positively contributing to Wikipedia especially related to facts about Mullah Omar. We can be reached at rugersage7@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Texas 17 (talk • contribs) 02:41, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Hi there, @Texas 17: please use the article's talk page —here– as to engage with the community, rather than a single editor over email. Kind regards, —MelbourneStar☆^talk 09:18, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

editing Lobsang Tenzin

Hi @MelbourneStar: I tried to put the entire data here and tried adding the sources as well for both text and pics. Please let me know if this is helpful or if you need me to do something else. RegardsSid5926 (talk) 06:56, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Lobsang Tenzin

Introduction- Main Image 1 or Main image 2 Lobsang Tenzin, better known by the titles Professor Venerable Samdhong Rinpoche (zam gdong rin po che) and to Tibetans as the 5th Samdhong Rinpoche (born 5 November 1939), was the previous prime minister (officially Kalon Tripa, or chairman of the cabinet), of the Central Tibetan Administration, or Tibetan government-in-exile, which is based in Dharamshala, India; Lobsang Sangay was elected to this position in April 2011. (Text source same as wikipedia) Early Life – Lobsang Tenzin was born in Jol, in eastern Tibet in 1939. At the age of five, he was recognised, according to Tibetan tradition, as the reincarnation of the 4th Samdhong Rinpoche and enthroned in Gaden Dechenling Monastery at Jol. Two years later he took vows as a monk, started his religious training at Drepung Monastery in Lhasa and completed it at the Madhyamika School of Buddhism.(Text source same as wikipedia) Exile to India and life as an educationist- After his training in Lhasa, he fled to India in 1959 after the Chinese siege of Tibet. From 1961 onwards Rinpoche worked in various Tibetan schools as a teacher. From October 1961, he served as the religious teacher of Tibetan School in Shimla and in 1963 served as the acting Principal. In 1964 he worked as religious teacher of Darjeeling Tibetan School and in 1965 at the age of 26, he was appointed as the Principal of Central School for Tibetans, Dalhousie and served there till 1970. He received his Lharampa degree in the year 1968 and Ngagrimpa degree in 1969 . In 1971 he became Principal of Central Institute of Higher Tibetan Studies (Now known as the Central University of Tibetan Studies) at Sarnath and later served as the Director from 1988 to 2001. Shortly after his flight from Tibet, 1960 in New Delhi From 1994 to 1995, he was awarded National Lectureship from Indian Council of Philosophical Research (ICPR), New Delhi. He assumed many important responsibilities including President of the Association of Indian Universities (AIU), a strong academic group of more than 250 Vice-Chancellors of Indian Universities, First Chancellor of Sanchi University of Buddhist-Indic Studies, Govt. of Madhya Pradesh and Chairman of various Trust and Foundations. Rinpoche is one of the very few Buddhist scholars in the world with this depth, experience and clarity in Buddhist philosophy and he also spent many years exploring directly with J. Krishnamurti, who was one of the great educationists in India. With J.Krishnamurty Rinpoche has been an honored guest at many forums in India. He has spoken on challenges India faces today, and has stressed on inclusion of the poor masses in development of the country. Advocacy and teachings- Rebiya Kadeer, an activist on behalf of the Uyghur people, and Samdhong Rinpoche, the prime minister of the exiled government of Tibet, spoke at an event hosted by Stanford's Friends of Tibet. Samdhong Rinpoche is an advocate of Gandhian philosophy and is a lifelong campaigner of non violence and is on the board of trustees of Swaraj Peeth Trust a Gandhian centre for non violence and peace . He has held lectures and talks with exchange groups in countries like Germany, Switzerland and USA and has spoken extensively on the Buddhist ideology and its importance in contemporary politics and economy. A large score of his lectures on general subjects like peace, happiness and compassion, electoral reforms, modern ethics, the environment, Swaraj and non violence are available in audio and video on his website and soundcloud. Stance on the ‘middle path’- Rinpoche is a staunch supporter of the middle path and in sync with the views of the Dalai Lama. He is of the opinion that the Tibet issue is alive on the international forum and has received widespread support due to its right direction and commitment to non violence. In his own words “Tibet cause is a just cause and not a power struggle. It is neither a political struggle nor a battle against the system. It is the struggle between truth and falsehood; justice and injustice.” A lifelong campaigner of Gandhian principles, he seeks not only political freedom for the Tibetan people but also to preserve the Tibetan Culture. In an interview he said, “Our ultimate goal is not just political freedom but the preservation of Tibetan culture. What will we gain if we win political freedom but lose what gives value to our lives? It is why we reject the option of violence. For respect for life is an inseparable aspect of the Tibetan culture we are fighting for." Political activities- Rinpoche served twice as the Speaker of the Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile from 1991 to 2001 . In 2001, he became the 1st ever democratically elected Prime Minister (officially Kalon Tripa) of Central Tibetan Administration or Tibetan government-in-exile, and served for two consecutive terms till 2011. Rinpoche taking Oath Rinpoche contributed in drafting the new constitution of Tibetan Government in Exile, educational and economic reforms, Rinpoche also insured the actions and policies of non-violence, transparency, environmentally sustainable and organic farming. Rinpoche has been working very closely with His Holiness the Dalai Lama. During Rinpoche’s Prime Ministership, he negotiated with the Chinese officials to bring a suitable solution to the Tibetan cause. A close aid to The Dalai Lama Boycott of the exiled Tibetan Govt. Elections- In March 2016 Samdhong Rinpoche refused to cast his vote in the elections for the post of Sikyong (Prime Minister) citing unhappiness with the competitive nature of the elections which witnessed widespread campaigning. He quoted, “I didn’t cast my vote as the exiled government was based on the principles of Swaraj of [Mahatma] Gandhi Ji. It didn’t involve competition or opposition. But, nowadays, representatives are involved in opposing each other through their individual campaigns. Therefore, I think, the exiled government is not heading in the right direction,” Publications- a. Buddhist Meditation b. Zam-gdoṅ Rin-po-cheʼi gsuṅ bśad daṅ gsuṅ rtsom phyogs bsgrigs c. Samdhong Rinpoche Uncompromising Truth for a Compromised World d. Bod kyi da ltaʼi dza drag gnas bab daṅ ṅa tshoʼi las ʼgan References

Hi @Sid5926: thanks for your contributions thus far. I think it would be best that you make such changes individually – rather than all at once; that way, other editors will be able to review the edits you've made. Additionally, further comments ought to be discussed on the article's talk page –here– so if you haven't already opened a discussion regarding the large amount of material you would like added to the article, please do so. Kind regards, —MelbourneStar☆^talk 09:29, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi @MelbourneStar: Thanks a lot for the help. I hope you are ok with the data and the sources provided. Please comment on that. If there are any suggestions regarding the content ( in order to make it better), your thoughts are welcome. Another thing that I need your advice for is that I think I have a better picture replace the main picture currently on the page. Is it ok to change that or that requires some process as well? Regards, Sid5926 (talk) 10:16, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Offical wikipedia account

Hi I'm working at İstanbul Sabahattin Zaim University international office I would like to Update our wikipedia page but my previous account and my work has been deleted because of Copyrights. I wanted to know how we can make our university a wikipedia account and how to prove the photos that we publish is ours. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.183.200.251 (talk) 11:11, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Thank you for your kind advices. rupa$$$ (talk) 04:31, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sonya Paxton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mike Doyle. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

just watched concession speech

wow what a gentleman - he is a civilised person - colin barnett - his concession speech shows real style JarrahTree 12:53, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

@JarrahTree: I'm watching it now, very gracious indeed. Will be very interested to see McGowan's victory speech! —MelbourneStar☆^talk 12:55, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

visually jerky, and prepared speech - possibly too much chest beating - the smiling wife is a bit much to take JarrahTree 13:21, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

he did thank colin for his hard work - JarrahTree 13:28, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Blacklist

Here is an article outlining the popular theory from TV Guide:

http://www.tvguide.com/news/the-blacklist-red-reddington-liz-mom-mother-theory-katarina/

Either way though, the facts are not correct in the article. Even if you do not wish to put the theory up there, which has all but been confirmed at this point, the previous version stated something along the lines that "Red admits he is her father." In point of fact he admits only that "She is his daughter", which of course is a big difference given that he is actually her mother. I would at least let those changes stand if you do not wish to put all the changes in. I appreciate the feedback, hope that helps! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.121.160.18 (talk) 14:37, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

@144.121.160.18: Hi there, welcome to Wikipedia.

In the source you've provided, could you please indicate to me where it explicitly states that Red is Liz's father? regards, —MelbourneStar☆^talk 11:43, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

From the original wiki article: "Red is confirmed as Liz's father in "Dr. Adrian Shaw: Conclusion."

and: "In "Dr. Adrian Shaw: Conclusion", while Red is being held captive and threatened by Alexander Kirk, Red admits that he is in fact Elizabeth Keene's father."

In point of fact he does not admit he is her father, rather in that episode he is asked, "Is masha your daughter." To which he replies in the affirmative. Those words were very deliberately used as most people will draw the conclusion that he is her father. However, all the other evidence points towards Reddington actually being Katarina--Liz's MOTHER, having assumed the real Red's identity in an effort to protect Liz/Masha from her enemies. Again, it's a theory, alebit a correct one, that Reddington is actually Katarina, but if you don't want to put that in I understand. I would, however, make it clear that there is ambiguity over whether or not he admitted to being her father to leave open the possibility (which will be revealed as the show progresses). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.121.160.18 (talk) 11:57, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Liberal Party of Australia edits

Dear MelbourneStar, In regards to the recent reversal of my contributions to the Liberal Party of Australia page in the ideology and political position fields, I put those edits in to inform the public on what the party was about and where it stands. Intentionally leaving those fields blank, whether intentionally or not, is like removing the bus stop signs or any other indication of a bus stop along a bus route and expecting the driver to know where to stop. Quite frankly, I find that highly unreasonable and potentially misleading. I hope you can understand where I am coming from. User:Futuramaking2999.

@Futuramaking2999: welcome to Wikipedia. Whether I agree with you or not regarding the ideological position of the party, is not really relevant, because this is about consensus. The ideological position of the Liberal Party, and indeed the Labor Party, has been widely discussed across both articles' talk pages. Currently, consensus among the community is that ideologies be left blank, as to avoid conjecture. By conjecture, I'm referring to the fact that both parties encompass a lot of political terrain from the right all the way to the left, and it is nowadays difficult to determine where parties stand ideologically (this is also reflected in reliable sources which are unable to form a uniform ideology for either party).

If you really want ideologies to be present, you will need to bring about a discussion on the article's talk page – here – gain the community's agreement, and then proceed with making such changes. Until then, the ideological field will be left intentionally blank. Kind regards, —MelbourneStar☆^talk 07:29, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Signature

MelbourneStar How'd you get your signature to look like that? You clearly know a whole lot more about Wikipedia and Users trends than I do ... I want to learn more teach me! You like my signature down below? ---WeLcOmEtOtHenEwMiLlEnIuM _(Talk) 12:48, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi @Welcometothenewmillenium: thanks for the compliments. I know probably as much or as little about user trends as you do, might I say. I just came up with my username colours by trying out different things with my username, and experimenting with the code. You've got a wonderful signature, if I may say so. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 07:31, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

RE:DELETION OF ARTICLE ON LATEEF BAKARE

I curated an article on Lateef Akande Bakare and it was flagged for deletion even while I was still working on the said article.The character in focus is a well-known accountant in Nigeria but unfortunately most of the references that can be cited on him are not notable to the standard of Wikipedia.In fact some of the interviews he granted some newspapers some years back are not searchable again online because links to them are not available...I had an opportunity of interviewing this fellow in 2008 in the course of my working as a journalist here in Nigeria.The interview was published both online and offline but unfortunately,the online edition is not available again.I have decided to create an article on him because much of the information about him is not online,hence it may be difficult for future generation to know about this man who has done much for humanity.I am of the view that if the article is allowed to go live,many persons/Wikipedia users who are familiar with him my cite some acceptable references about him.In this regard,I want to suggest that the notice of deletion placed on the article should be removed and allowed to be published immediately,particularly when I have supplied some references on the article that substantially meet the Wikipedia standard. Instinct71 (talk) 10:41, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi @Instinct71: the article in question is subject to a deletion discussion, as can be viewed here. Discretion as to whether or not to continue to pursue this deletion discussion lies with the user who initiated it, user Kleuske. Should they have seen the work that you've done to the article since the notice was placed, they may decide to withdraw the deletion discussion should they see fit to do so; otherwise, if they still have reservations, the deletion discussion will continue and last over a period of a week, where other editors will participate and discuss through means of a "Keep - for X, Y, Z reasons" or "Delete - for X, Y, Z reasons". You are more than welcome to participate in the discussion. Regards, —MelbourneStar☆^talk 11:02, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

I still don't see "significant coverage by independent, reliable souces". I do see a lot of unsouced claims. I did a google search for sources and came up short. Hence I will let the AfD run its course. Kleuske (talk) 11:07, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

I will be very glad if you contribute more on the deletion of article on Lateef Bakare.This is the 3rd day of the notice and seems no much contribution has been made by editors. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Instinct71 (talk • contribs) 12:34, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Re:Deletion of article on Lateef Bakare

As I said earlier,the article was flagged for deletion when I had not made any reference to it.Since the notice was given,I have made about 11 reference additions to the article.So by all respects,this is significant.I hold an opinion that more,significant and decent contribution may be generated on the article if ti is published so that some persons outside this platform who may have some things to add are given the opportunity.Instinct71 (talk) 12:44, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

@Instinct71: as stated above, withdrawing or continuing to pursue the deletion discussion is up to the person who filed the discussion, Kleuske. They have decided to continue with the discussion. Feel free to participate, if you wish, otherwise it will run its course. Kind regards, —MelbourneStar☆^talk 01:04, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

"Skyscrapper"

my apologies. I didn't see "history of tallest" part. that was stupid of me.

Aside from that, I have a question. My E-mail address is "(Redacted)" and I happened to have found my email address on this page:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk%3AAll_your_base_are_belong_to_us%2FArchive_4?oldformat=true

It seems like someone rudely used my email address without me knowing. And I can assure you it was not me because I never knew what AYBABTU was until I found my email address posted there just a couple of days ago, and I never replace [@] or [.] with [at] or [dot].

Is it possible to get my email address removed from the post? If that is not possible, can I at least see what that crook specifically said in the original post?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.235.241.50 (talk • contribs)

Hi @218.235.241.50: that's okay, mistakes happen.

Re your second concern, I've removed the email address from the page you've referred to. I myself, can't understand what the user who posted it was saying; nevertheless, I don't believe they meant anything nefarious. I've also removed the email address from your above post, just in case! kind regards, —MelbourneStar☆^talk 05:32, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Julia Gillard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Leader of the Government in the Senate. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:09, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Nevermind, I will make some changes to my original edits and see if that is better.

i did not make any changes and yet you send me a message. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.55.76.187 (talk) 10:19, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Help

Hi! MelbourneStar. I'am Rupalavanyan I need an small help, do you know to make a semi-protected lock to an article. rupa$$$ (talk) 11:07, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia & Youtube Project

Hi MelbourneStar,

My name’s Alex. I’m a student at American University, and I’m working on a project on Wikipedia and Youtube. I noticed you made a relatively large amount of edits to the List of Youtubers Wikipedia page and I was wondering if I could get your input on a few questions.

1. After talking to a few Wikipedians and doing some research, it seems as though Youtubers have a harder time obtaining a Wikipedia page and/or higher quality pages than other “traditional” professions. Do you agree with this assessment? If so, why do you think this is?

2. What could Wikipedia change to better accommodate notable figures from newer platforms like Youtube? What could Youtube do to better live up to Wikipedia standards?

3. If you could change the guidelines on Notability in any way, what changes would you make and why? If not, why do you think they’re stable enough that future societal progression could still be covered equally?

I look forward to hearing back from you.

Ah2681a (talk) 09:10, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi @Ah2681a: apologies for my belated response! I, too, have been quite busy doing uni assignments left, right and centre, and have finally found a window of time to respond.

These are my answers to your questions:

• 1 — I sort of agree with the notion that YouTubers have a more difficult time obtaining a Wikipedia article and/or higher quality articles. It is important to recognise that Wikipedia is always evolving and changing over time (we're only a few years older than YouTube), and thus, our approaches over time will change. Notwithstanding this, Wikipedia has plenty of biographies of living people notability guidelines which govern what we write, and if a YouTuber does not meet a certain threshold (ie. as described here, or here) then an article cannot be created at this time. But this is the same approach we use for musicians, actors, performs, and so on.
• 2 — I think gradual changes at Wikipedia are happening in terms of how we accommodate notable figures from newer platforms such as YouTube; take a look at this revision from 2007 of the List of Youtubers article. Compare it to today's revision. You can see what a difference 10 years makes.

YouTubers are certainly branching out more than what they did a decade ago, which also helps. Collaborating with established celebrities, making headlines, singing, turning to acting, etc. — as a Youtuber goes up the ranks in terms of their outreach, then of course, they will be in-line for an article to be created on them.

• 3 — I'm of the opinion that Wikipedia's notability guideline is fine as it is. Just remember, Wikipedia is the world's largest encyclopedia (ever) — we already accommodate for topics that the traditional encyclopedias do not. For example: try to find any of the YouTubers (with articles) listed in this Wikipedia article on Encyclopædia Britannica. You may run into a small problem looking for most (if not all) YouTube entries from that Wikipedia article on the Britannica site. Why? hint: because there are no articles.

I hope my responses suffice. I wish you all the very best with your assignment! Kind regards, —MelbourneStar☆^talk 14:23, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Thank you so much for your reply MelbourneStar, I really appreciate you taking the time to give me your insight during your busy schedule. Goodluck with all of your assignments as well!

Ah2681a (talk) 02:35, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

सोलापूर ह्या विकीपानावरील बदलांबाबत.

मी ह्या पानावरील बदल हे जाणीवपूर्वक केले होते. 'सोलापूर हे कर्नाटकात विलीन करावे' आणि 'सोलापुरातील कन्नड भाषिकांची संख्या आणि कन्नड संस्कृती' ह्या बाबतीत काही आक्षेपार्ह मजकूर ह्या पानावर होता आणि तो काढून टाकण्यासाठी मी सोलापूर ह्या विकिपीडिया वरिल पानात बदल केला होता. त्या बदलांचे संपादन सारांशांमध्ये मी मराठी भाषेत विवरण केले होते पण ते स्वीकारले गेले नाही 

मला इंग्लिश भाषा बोलता येत नाही. त्यामुळे माझ्या बदलांचे विवेचन मी इंग्लिश मध्ये करू शकत नाही.

आपल्याला हा संदेश सुद्धा मी मराठी ह्या माझ्या मातृभाषेत पाठवत आहे. तो वाचता येत नसेल तर आंतरजालावरून त्याचे भाषांतर करून तो वाचावा ही विनंती आपणांस करत आहे.

धन्यवाद.-Restreick — Preceding unsigned comment added by Restreick (talk • contribs) 06:16, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Martin Page (singer) edits

Hey there! I had tried to make edits to Martin Page's wiki back in November, and I just am now seeing the message from you about why you took down the edits. I totally understand. But if possible, I'd like to enable those edits. I'm his assistant and his manager requested I make the changes. If you want proof of this just let me know what you think would be best and I'd be happy to provide it. Thanks in advance!

-Vanessa — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vrleavitt (talk • contribs) 19:03, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

st kilda east Victoria

There's no jewish school named cheder levi yitzchak? As far as I'm concerned it's on 12 chapel st. Menachemshuch (talk) 23:14, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Yes there is i don't see why you are deleting http://www.afr.com/real-estate/christians-and-jews-come-together-on-melbourne-mansion-deal-20160509-gopp10 Menachemshuch (talk) 11:10, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

So please stop deleting Menachemshuch (talk) 11:11, 20 June 2017 (UTC)