MegaGardevoir68
Welcome!
Hello, MegaGardevoir68, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Michael Crabtree does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.
There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Falcon8765 (TALK) 01:24, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
- It's been many thanks getting to know you Falcon8765. I know my Crabtree edit was a mistake but I'm just a rookie and trust me, I am not psychic or any fairy. I'm sure you look like a pretty decent patrol guy despite being vandalized so many times. I'm having my morning tea and cookies just for warm-up before editing. I sure I know the truth behind what to do and how it's planned. Well that's that. So long for now. MegaGardevoir68 (talk) 01:43, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
MegaGardevoir68, you are invited to the Teahouse edit
|
Hi MegaGardevoir68! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
forgery of my signature edit
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Beeblebrox (talk) 16:35, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
Blocked edit
I've gone ahead and blocked you. We know that you did not first start editing Wikipedia on February 24 because of your familiarity with Wikipedia personalities and conventions. Furthermore, you have been disruptively impersonating administrators, here and [1] and here and here. You were given a chance to account for your actions, and you chose to do this instead: [2]. If you have an explanation, you'd best post it here using the {{unblock}} template, and it had better be a good one, because we don't need silliness like this around. --Jayron32 17:00, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
MegaGardevoir68 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I previously refused to explain my actions for impersonating an admin, in which I ain't anyway. I just saw random talk pages that had no messages regarding blocks and revokes and corrected them without admin privileges until I wasn't allowed to do so.
Decline reason:
Checkuser verifies that you are a sockpuppet of User:PrivateMasterHD. kelapstick(bainuu) 17:19, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.