Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 19) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KGirlTrucker81 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KGirl (Wanna chat?) 19:59, 19 November 2017 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Meekrab2012, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KGirl (Wanna chat?) 19:59, 19 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Page moves edit

Hi, @Meekrab2012! I replied to you at User Talk:Pelagic#Question from Meekrab2012 on Talk:Water management in greater Tegucigalpa (19:52, 9 September 2021). Please don't move normal pages around as a test, you can create user subpages if you want to experiment (e.g. User:Meekrab2012/test1). Seeing Timed text and Template Talk namespaces as destinations, I guess you were just fiddling with the drop-down in the Move page. ⁓ Pelagicmessages ) 17:57, 10 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

I managed to move the article back myself, but for the redirect I requested a technical move [1]. ⁓ Pelagicmessages ) 18:24, 10 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Edit summaries edit

Meekrab, while I'm here on your messages page, I'll make a request about a separate issue. Can you use sensible edit summaries, please? "Ip, proprietary intell" doesn't relate to the change you made, and if people see a lot of these, they might think that you're not here to help. ⁓ Pelagicmessages ) 18:35, 10 September 2021 (UTC)Reply