Your submission at Articles for creation: Richard Gardner (August 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Gbawden (talk) 13:26, 8 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
Hi. He is probably notable, but as I said you need references to establish this. See WP:RS. You should try find newspaper articles to back up the claims in the article. You can't just use his works as references - you have to substantiate. And you need to put the references inline. Also have a look at WP:BLP Gbawden (talk) 13:51, 8 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Tea House

edit
 
Hello! MatthewThomasG, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Gbawden (talk) 13:26, 8 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Richard Gardner (scientist) has been accepted

edit
 
Richard Gardner (scientist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 05:31, 20 August 2016 (UTC)Reply