Welcome to Wikipedia edit

Welcome! edit

Hello, Mattginsberg1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! —Darkwind (talk) 16:02, 12 March 2012 (UTC)Reply


Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Dr.Fill, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Darkwind (talk) 16:02, 12 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your note re Draft:Matthew Ginsberg edit

Hi Mattginsberg1 and thank you for your note. Anyone can edit Wikipedia, but general guidance is that autobiographies are a bad idea – this article gives guidance, but the in-a-nutshell issue is that you (or any members of your family) are unlikely to have a neutral point of view and there is a clear conflict between your aims and that of Wikipedia. If your intention is to promote your own interests – business, reputation or otherwise – that doesn't sit well with what Wikipedia aims to do, which is to present neutral material. In practice, many articles are created by individuals about themselves, but you would be wise to read round some of the issues that may arise and I'd suggest declaring your interest on your talk page especially as your user name gives a clear hint of who the author is. Be aware that other editors can and will change the page if they don't agree with the tone or feel the information is not properly supported – you don't 'own' any page that you write even if the article is about you. The article itself was not substantial enough on references when I checked it and the tone was not encyclopaedic, so there is some work to do. Libby norman (talk) 15:47, 27 July 2014 (UTC)Reply