Mate4Malta, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi Mate4Malta! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Join WikiProject Malta edit

Subtropical-man (talk / en-2) 17:36, 19 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Andrzej Maleszka edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Andrzej Maleszka requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — Smjg (talk) 01:46, 19 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Shawn Cauchi edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shawn Cauchi, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Mr. Vernon (talk) 17:13, 24 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Project Automata edit

Hello, Mate4Malta. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Project Automata, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Onel5969 TT me 16:23, 19 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of BattleStick edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on BattleStick requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 19:06, 20 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 30 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Villa Rundle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Republic street. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 30 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Image without license edit

Unspecified source/license for File:Edominationslogo.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Edominationslogo.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 10:45, 30 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Unspecified source/license for File:Ourworldlogo.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Ourworldlogo.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 10:45, 30 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Unspecified source/license for File:Battlestick-logo.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Battlestick-logo.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 11:00, 30 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of EDominations edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on EDominations, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -- Dane talk 22:09, 30 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Image without license edit

Unspecified source/license for File:Munxar FalconsFC.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Munxar FalconsFC.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 08:45, 1 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Unspecified source/license for File:Xewkija TigersFC.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Xewkija TigersFC.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 08:46, 1 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for May 7 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited BattleStick, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2D. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 7 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Andrzej Kalwas edit

Hello, Mate4Malta. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Andrzej Kalwas, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Andrzej Kalwas to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

Nsk92 (talk) 18:11, 13 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Image without license edit

Unspecified source/license for File:Integrity Party.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Integrity Party.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 22:45, 20 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Radio Garden edit

Hello Mate4Malta,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Radio Garden for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

TimothyJosephWood 16:44, 1 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Rise of Industry edit

 

The article Rise of Industry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent references. No claim of notability. May be promotional.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:01, 4 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Ultimate Epic Battle Simulator moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Ultimate Epic Battle Simulator, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. czar 07:58, 9 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Xwejni Bay edit

Can you please add sources? The WP:BURDEN is on the creator to do so. Boleyn (talk) 15:56, 9 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Marsalforn Bay edit

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Mate4Malta, thanks for creating Marsalforn Bay!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add sources; the WP:BURDEN is on the creator to do so.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 15:25, 20 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of BattleStick edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on BattleStick requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Rentier (talk) 21:45, 22 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

WARNING edit

All articles need sources. All articles on living people need clear WP:INLINECITED sources, including Andrzej Kalwas. It is disappointing that after bringing concerns to you several times, you have not WP:ENGAGED and have not rectified the problem. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 19:03, 23 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Battlestick-logo.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Battlestick-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 26 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Notice edit

Speedy deletion nomination of Integrity Party (Malta) edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Integrity Party (Malta) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Anarcho-authoritarian (talk) 23:11, 26 September 2017 (UTC) Anarcho-authoritarian (talk) 23:11, 26 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Last warning edit

Despite warnings here and elsewhere, you continue to create unreferenced articles and you refuse to WP:COMMUNICATE, which is a requirement on Wikipedia. If you need help with sourcing, please ask, I'm happy to help. If you create any more unreferenced articles without discussion, I will refer the matter to WP:ANI. We really need to verify that what is in the article is accurate, and references are essential to that. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 05:42, 27 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (St. Lawrence Spurs F.C.) has been reviewed! edit

Thanks for creating St. Lawrence Spurs F.C., Mate4Malta!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for creating this. It has an empty references section, can you please address this? Thanks.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 06:44, 1 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Munxar Falcons F.C.) has been reviewed! edit

Thanks for creating Munxar Falcons F.C., Mate4Malta!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

This also appears to have no sources, but are the 'external links' actually the sources rather than friendly suggestions? Can you please clearly add your source?

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 06:45, 1 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Żebbuġ Rovers F.C. edit

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Mate4Malta, thanks for creating Żebbuġ Rovers F.C.!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This is a completely unreferenced article; can you please add your source?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 06:46, 1 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of BattleStick edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on BattleStick requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Rentier (talk) 08:26, 14 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Ultimate Epic Battle Simulator concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ultimate Epic Battle Simulator, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 10 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Image without license edit

Unspecified source/license for File:Logo marsalforn.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Logo marsalforn.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 20:45, 17 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Mate4Malta. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Ultimate Epic Battle Simulator edit

 

Hello, Mate4Malta. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ultimate Epic Battle Simulator".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 09:22, 10 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Sources edit

You have been warned several times that you are heading towards an WP:ANI for persistently creating unreferenced articles and refusing to communicate, yet you have just created Sikhism in Poland with no references or categories. Please see WP:V, WP:BURDEN and WP:Communication is required. If this goes to ANI, you're at serious risk of an indefinite block. Boleyn (talk) 07:41, 27 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for attempting to fix this. Please be aware that WP:Wikipedia is not a reliable source and cannot be used as a source in one of our articles - look at where that other article has its information cited to and go from there. This is the same for all wikis - because they can be edited by anyone, we need clear WP:RELIABLESOURCES. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 09:14, 28 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
Andrzej Kalwas still needs WP:INLINECITED sources - these are a requirement for biographies of living people, but very useful for all articles. Several of your creations remain unreferenced: Il-Gelmus, Żebbuġ Rovers F.C., Marsalforn Bay, St. Lawrence Spurs F.C., Xwejni Bay, Munxar Falcons F.C.. Some have external links, but this means suggestions for further reading rather than sources used to inform the article. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 09:19, 28 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Filipinos in Malta) has been reviewed! edit

Thanks for creating Filipinos in Malta, Mate4Malta!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Redirected; not notable enough for standalone article.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 09:17, 28 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Barry Weintraub edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Barry Weintraub requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Largoplazo (talk) 19:08, 5 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Barry Weintraub edit

 

The article Barry Weintraub has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:BIO or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 20:14, 10 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Sources and communication edit

Can you please respond to this message? You have been contacted many times about creating unreferenced articles. You have not replied to the messages and have not added your sources, leaving these articles in a poor state. I again point you to WP:Communication is required, WP:BURDEN and WP:V. If you continue to ignore this, you risk an WP:ANI which could result ni an indefinite block. Please just discuss the issue. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 20:17, 10 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Well, you've continued to edit but haven't responded to my (11!) messages, sent between July 2017 and January 2018. I have pointed you towards WP:Communication is required, WP:V, WP:BURDEN and explained that if you didn't respond I would have to initiate an ANI. No response. Blow is a list of your creations which are tagged for serious issues, many for being unreferenced. I have previously contacted you to see if you understand the difference between external links and references, I assume you do - I can't assume otherwise as you refuse to reply. HOwever, most of your articles have neither sources nor external links. I have spent hours of my time cleaning up these articles and messaging you to try to resolve the situation.

WP:ANI edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Boleyn (talk) 15:22, 20 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Gozo at Arms (2018) edit

Hello Mate4Malta,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Gozo at Arms (2018) for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created in violation of a block or ban. Content created by banned users will be deleted immediately.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

SamHolt6 (talk) 20:06, 27 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Blocked indefinitely edit

Hi, Mate4Malta. Thank you for your attempts at contributing here. Unfortunately, we have standards that must be adhered to. Look at this talk page. There have consistently been long-term problems with your editing here. There have been an excessive amount of attempts to communicate these issues to you, so that you could fix the problems. However, you've ignored all of them, and are still continuing to add unsourced content to the project. Shockingly, your only attempt at communication was to attack an editor who was trying to warn you about the problems with your editing. Contrary to what you said, cleaning up your messes is not any of our responsibility. We require you to be able to edit in accordance with the rules, promptly and politely respond to communications, and adjust your behavior when problems are brought to your attention. As you have consistently failed to do any of this, you have been blocked indefinitely. Swarm 20:09, 27 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello, if you want to improve your behavior, ok - use Template:Unblock reviewed on this user talk page, with description of your desire to improve. Subtropical-man (talk / en-2) 21:33, 27 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Response to the message on my talk page edit

Thanks for finally responding to me. It is great that you want to contribute to WIkipedia, especially at such a young age. I have to echo the comments above though - I have repeatedly raised issues with you and you have just refused to discuss it or change the way you are editing. It might help you to look at the guidelines/essays I've directed you to before: WP:Communication is required, [[WP:BURDEN] ]and WP:V. Initiating an WP:ANI is not something I take lightly, I tried for a very long time, and spent hours of my time, trying to avoid that. Please remember that 'indefinite' means until we're sure this behaviour won't be repeated, it doesn't need to be forever and lots of people have been unblocked and then worked collaboratively. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 14:05, 28 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Response to Boleyn edit

Boleyn (talk) Thanks for replying. May I be unblocked now? :)

Unblock Request edit

{{unblock reviewed|1=See above.|accept=Unblocked per above. [[User:Mate4Malta]] ([[User talk:Mate4Malta|talk]]) 12:28, 8 March 2018 (UTC)}}

Hello, sorry for my recent actions of not following the Wikipedia guidelines properly and ignoring messages sent by other users to me regarding my edits. I'm really sorry, and I promise that I will improve and will try not to violate any Wikipedia guidelines next time. May I be unblocked? :)

Regards,

  • Continentaleurope Ok, thanks. Will contact you if I need help. When will I be unblocked? 15:54, 13 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mate4Malta (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello, I request to be unblocked and from now on I will be communicating when needed.

Decline reason:

Multiple open unblock requests are not needed. I will leave the other one open. SQLQuery me! 16:19, 27 January 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • Hi. I have disabled the "unblocked" template you incorrectly used in March 2018, as that made it look like you had been unblocked and did not add you to the list of unblock requests for admin attention. As you have now made a new request with the correct template, an admin should be along to review it before too long. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:58, 20 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

{{unblock}}

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mate4Malta (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello, it's been almost 2 weeks and my unblocked request template hasn't been reviewed by an admin yet. I expected a much faster approach from Wikipedia. From my experience admins have been answering my queries in a matter of hours, and sometimes a day. I apologize if I'm not familiar with the waiting time here.

Decline reason:

Before we can unblock you, we need a commitment to source content. PhilKnight (talk) 06:29, 4 February 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock}}