Abdominal Thrusts edit

Your 1 September edit to the Abdominal Thrusts article is entirely in the second person. This is inconsistant with the rest of the article and generally inappropriate for an encyclopedic article. Would you please rework that paragraph to put it in the less personal third person? Pzavon 16:41, 2 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

You said on my User Talk page that your edits to Abdominal Thrusts make it a lot eaier to read when it brings the reader into the writing. That may be true in general, but this is an encyclopedia where a neutral point of view is a major goal. Writing in the second person is not usually appropriate for that and, in my opinion, this is not one of those exceptional times. I've not had time to go back and change it to third person. I would like to see you give it a try, but I will do it if I get the time. Pzavon 17:08, 27 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Freakazoid! vandalism edit

 

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Freakazoid!, are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. -- Jay Maynard 00:42, 19 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Removing vandalism warnings is itself considered vandalism, and will likely result in faster and longer blocks should they be deemed necessary. -- Jay Maynard 16:07, 19 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have not seen a warning like this over something so trivial taken to such an extent. Jay Maynard really seems to have it out for you. Your edit was NOTHING like vandalism, if anything a misspelled word, then Jay Maynard AGAIN jumps all over your talk page for deleting the warning he so carelessly throws at people. People like him make me sick. Sorry this has happened to you Master Thief. - John

Image:CNthing.png edit

Hello, Master Thief-117. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:CNthing.png) was found at the following location: User:Master Thief-117. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 22:26, 15 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (Image:CNthing.png) edit

Thanks for uploading Image:CNthing.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 12:50, 28 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

New WikiProject edit

A New WikiProject has been proposed as a sub-project of Medicine. Your opinion would be appreciated as you are listed as a "intrested User" on the Project page. Please take part in the discussion, located here. Exit2DOS2000TC 03:21, 19 July 2008 (UTC)Reply