Speedy deletion nomination of Photourismography edit

Hello Masoud Moein,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Photourismography for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. JamKaftan (talk) 18:07, 5 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Something invented edit

Sorry, but it's too soon for an article. You have to reference things with reliable independent sources WP:RS to show that the subject is notable. If you haven't even got your website up (not that that would be a reliable independent source anyway), there is not much chance of anything in independent sources. Wikipedia records things that are notable - they've been around and are widely known. Things that are only new and not known by anyone else come under WP:OR - original research. We don't publish new things. Peridon (talk) 19:11, 5 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

OK, you are right, thanks for the descriptions.