Martin952017
Welcome edit
|
Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution edit
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Argentine Federal Police. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:16, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
September 2019 edit
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Nigos (talk • Contribs) 10:23, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
List of equipment of the Argentine Army edit
Will You Please STOP Vandalism !. There is No Sources that Most of New Weapons are purchers.124.82.18.66 (talk) 10:59, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
- It is not vandalism. See WP:VANDALISM for more information on what is vandalism on Wikipedia. Nigos (talk • Contribs) 06:47, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
New message from Nigos edit
Message added 00:45, 4 September 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion edit
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Nigos (talk • Contribs) 06:46, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Oh my god. edit
Will you explain why you keep revent and repeact again and again. Im trying to help here. Please explain. Thank you.115.134.33.21 (talk) 16:37, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Edit warring at List of equipment of the Argentine Army edit
Hello Margin952017. You've been warned for edit warring per a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. You may be blocked if you revert the article again unless you have obtained a prior consensus in your favor on the article talk page. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 00:55, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
- Thank You so much Mr Johnaston. Will you please fix it up. Im done with this man a lot trying to fix it up badly.175.142.138.81 (talk) 04:47, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
September 2019 edit
Hello, I'm Nigos. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:List of equipment of the Argentine Army that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Nigos (talk • Contribs) 02:00, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
July 2022 edit
Hello, I'm Loafiewa. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, IWI ACE, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Loafiewa (talk) 18:03, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at IWI ACE, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Per WP:GUN-USER, a source must explicitly say that the country or organisation in question uses a particular weapon. Loafiewa (talk) 18:16, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at IWI ACE, you may be blocked from editing. Loafiewa (talk) 18:17, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at IWI ACE. Loafiewa (talk) 18:19, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at IWI ACE shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 18:25, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. EvergreenFir (talk) 18:25, 27 July 2022 (UTC)- If you decide to edit this page again after the block, please be aware of WP:NOR - if you would like to add an entry to the user section, then you'll have to provide a reliable source that explicitly says that the unit/country in question uses it. Loafiewa (talk) 18:32, 27 July 2022 (UTC)