Image tagging for File:OneCapitalCenter.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading File:OneCapitalCenter.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:10, 19 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright problem with File:Rochester,MN-skyline.JPG edit

Thanks for uploading File:Rochester,MN-skyline.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:55, 20 March 2009 (UTC)Reply


File copyright problem with File:TacoBellArena.jpg edit

 
File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:TacoBellArena.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

File for deletion edit

Proposed deletion of David Cubillan edit

 

The article David Cubillan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

does not meet Wiki criteria for basketball notabvility

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mwinog2777 (talk) 20:08, 18 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — neuro(talk)(review) 15:52, 22 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for File:Corpus Christi downtown.JPG edit

Thanks for uploading File:Corpus Christi downtown.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:05, 24 March 2009 (UTC)Reply


File copyright problem with File:Corpus Christi downtown.JPG edit

 
File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Corpus Christi downtown.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — neuro(talk)(review) 14:13, 24 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of List of tallest buildings in Wichita edit

I have nominated List of tallest buildings in Wichita, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tallest buildings in Wichita. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ipatrol (talk) 15:31, 28 March 2009 (UTC)Reply


File copyright problem with File:BoisePlace.jpg edit

 
File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:BoisePlace.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — neuro(talk)(review) 01:24, 6 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright problem with File:QwestTower.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading File:QwestTower.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:56, 22 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

New golfer articles edit

Good work with the creation of several new articles. FYI instead of the ad-hoc table you have been using, there is a standardised infobox template available: Template:Infobox Golfer. Regards. wjematherbigissue 18:48, 4 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:North Carolina Tar Heels current roster edit

 Template:North Carolina Tar Heels current roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. - Masonpatriot (talk) 02:03, 26 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Louisville Cardinals current roster edit

 Template:Louisville Cardinals current roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. - Masonpatriot (talk) 02:03, 26 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Duke Blue Devils current roster edit

 Template:Duke Blue Devils current roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. - Masonpatriot (talk) 02:04, 26 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Memphis Tigers current roster edit

 Template:Memphis Tigers current roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. fuzzy510 (talk) 04:11, 26 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Michigan State Spartans current roster edit

 Template:Michigan State Spartans current roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Masonpatriot (talk) 04:15, 26 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Memphis Tigers current roster edit

 Template:Memphis Tigers current roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Masonpatriot (talk) 04:15, 26 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Someone nominated your articles for deletion edit

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_tallest_buildings_in_Amarillo along with similar articles, are grouped together. Thought you should know someone is trying to delete something you created. I voted Keep. Dream Focus 22:34, 24 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of List of tallest buildings in Amarillo edit

 

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of tallest buildings in Amarillo. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tallest buildings in Amarillo. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:19, 25 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Chinese Challenge edit

An article that you have been involved in editing, Chinese Challenge, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chinese Challenge. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. wjematherbigissue 15:53, 27 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Articles for deletion nomination of Trent Meacham edit

I have nominated Trent Meacham, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trent Meacham. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Crotchety Old Man (talk) 20:19, 6 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Articles for deletion nomination of Mike Tisdale edit

I have nominated Mike Tisdale, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Tisdale. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Crotchety Old Man (talk) 20:20, 6 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

J.T. Tiller edit

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: J.T. Tiller. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:15, 29 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Unreferenced BLPs edit

  Hello MarquetteGoldenEagles! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 5 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 944 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Kamil Chanas - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Ralph Sampson III - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  3. Jacek Fafiński - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  4. Wayne Chism - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  5. Joe Stansberry - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:36, 16 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Articles for deletion nomination of Isaiah Dahlman edit

I have nominated Isaiah Dahlman, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isaiah Dahlman. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. TexasAndroid (talk) 18:25, 7 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

 Template:Illinois Fighting Illini current roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Rikster2 (talk) 21:16, 19 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

 Template:Marquette Golden Eagles current roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Rikster2 (talk) 01:04, 15 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ronan Flood edit

 

The article Ronan Flood has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ...William 11:54, 19 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

List of tallest buildings in Milwaukee edit

Just letting you know that I have nominated an article that you created, List of tallest buildings in Milwaukee, for featured status. The discussion is here: Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of tallest buildings in Milwaukee/archive1 Zonafan39 (talk) 21:10, 2 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

File for deletion edit

Proposed deletion of David Cubillan edit

 

The article David Cubillan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

does not meet Wiki criteria for basketball notabvility

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mwinog2777 (talk) 20:08, 18 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

List of tallest buildings in Amarillo edit

Thank you for creating List of tallest buildings in Amarillo. I am working on Cornelius T. Herring and I was pleased to see a picture of the Herring Hotel there. Would you be interested in creating an article about the hotel? I don't think it is listed, but it seems fairly historic. Please ping me or reply on my talkpage when you reply. Thank you.Zigzig20s (talk) 01:58, 9 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Górnik Wałbrzych current roster edit

 Template:Górnik Wałbrzych current roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 15:45, 15 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Kalle Brink edit

 

The article Kalle Brink has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. —S Marshall T/C 14:47, 8 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of List of tallest buildings in Amarillo for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of tallest buildings in Amarillo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tallest buildings in Amarillo (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.   // Timothy :: talk  02:58, 8 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of List of tallest buildings in Shreveport for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of tallest buildings in Shreveport is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tallest buildings in Shreveport until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

PMC(talk) 02:07, 5 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of List of tallest buildings in Charleston, West Virginia for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of tallest buildings in Charleston, West Virginia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tallest buildings in Charleston, West Virginia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

PMC(talk) 19:50, 19 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of List of tallest buildings in Little Rock for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of tallest buildings in Little Rock is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tallest buildings in Little Rock until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

PMC(talk) 06:23, 3 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Bryan Cupito edit

 

The article Bryan Cupito has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. jlwoodwa (talk) 20:55, 21 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Ronan Flood for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ronan Flood is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ronan Flood until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Boleyn (talk) 13:47, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply