January 2013 edit

As this is my member space I think that what WikiDan6 wrote is irrelenvant as he did with my article. (which was relevant) His interventions were taking into account and now I don't want to see his comments any more.

( I read the terms and conditions) and as it is my space I decided that his comments are irrelevant)

January 2013 edit

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:WikiDan61 with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Skamecrazy123 (talk) 23:52, 15 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the "sandbox" rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Skamecrazy123 (talk) 23:55, 15 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jalal Nali with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Skamecrazy123 (talk) 00:10, 16 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

To be clear edit

You can remove (almost) anything you want from your talk page. It's not always advised, but there's no rule against it. However, you may not remove content from other users' talk pages, even if the content is about you. I see that there was an incident in the past where you got confused as to which users you were talking to, so I realize it's possible that you might not have realized that the content you were removing was on another editor's talk page. But you need to understand that the same policies that say you're allowed to remove anything from you want from this page say that you're not allowed to remove anything from his page without his permission. (Unless it's very offensive or something, but this was not the case.) — Francophonie&Androphilie(Je vous invite à me parler) 00:36, 16 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

(You're also not allowed to blank a closed AfD entry, except for in special cases where things get really really ugly. Once again, though, that excception doesn't apply here.) — Francophonie&Androphilie(Je vous invite à me parler) 00:38, 16 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Jalal Nali edit

Hi MadmanBot, This article is mine and I never put it there? user Maroc Intelligence

=========================================== edit

Hello Maroc Intelligence,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, Jalal Nali, may be copied from http://www.wikifolks.org/wiki/index.php/Jalal_Nali. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 21:37, 17 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello Maroc Intellegence,

Just thought I'd let you know that User:MadmanBot is a bot, a computer program that makes edits that would take too much time for human editors to do. So, Madmanbot can't respond to any messages addressed to it. Howicus (talk) 03:22, 18 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Repost of Jalal Nali edit

  A tag has been placed on Jalal Nali requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this:   which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 22:29, 17 January 2013 (UTC)Reply