Managing a conflict of interest edit

  Hello, Mark Easton. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Mark Easton, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Shakehandsman (talk) 21:31, 26 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Username concerns edit

Wikipedia is always concerned to protect the reputation of real people, especially those in the public eye. Your editing actions in twice blanking referenced content at the page for the well-respected BBC journalist Mark Easton seem to me highly unlikely to be the actions of that person, as it would expose Mr Easton to accusations of extraordinary unprofessionalism.

We would normally wish all concerns over content to be discused on the Talk Page of the relevant article, and to ensure it respects our policies on the Biographies of Living People

We also have a policy on Wikipedia editors who adopt the names of real people, which you can read at WP:REALNAME. This involves temporarily blocking that account out of respect for the named person, then asking that person to send an email from an official account, confirming their identity. This then allows the unblocking of that account. Whether you are genuinely Mr Easton, or not, I'm sure you will understand why an administrator will shortly be taking action on this account. Regards, Nick Moyes (talk) 10:34, 11 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because the username, Mark Easton, matches the name of a well-known, living person.

If you are the person represented by this username, please note that the practice of blocking such usernames is to protect you from being impersonated, not to discourage you from editing Wikipedia. You may choose to edit under a new username (see information below), but keep in mind that you are welcome to continue to edit under this username. If you choose to do so, we ask the following:

  1. Please be willing and able to prove your identity to Wikipedia.
  2. Please send an email to info-en wikimedia.org. Be aware that the volunteer response team that handles email is indeed operated entirely by volunteers, and the reply may not be immediate.

If you are not the person represented by this username, you are welcome to choose a new username (see below).

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

  1. Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} below. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "Email this user" on their talk page.
  2. At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
  3. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.
If you think that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below this notice, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

-- Ed (Edgar181) 13:28, 11 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Mark Easton (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

See above.

Accept reason:

Identity confirmed, see VRTS ticket # 2018031910007099. Primefac (talk) 12:29, 19 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for taking the trouble to demonstrate that this account is genuinely owned by you, Mr. Easton. We do take information - and indeed misinformation - on Wikipedia seriously, and I appreciate your explanation of your concerns on the article about you. I hope you feel that all of us volunteer Wikipedians here have acted appropriately and in all good faith. Regards, Nick Moyes (talk) 13:46, 21 March 2018 (UTC)Reply