Orphaned non-free image File:4INFO AdHaven Bullseye MultiScreen Advertacular.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:4INFO AdHaven Bullseye MultiScreen Advertacular.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:34, 19 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:4INFO AdHaven Speedeon Screenshot.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:4INFO AdHaven Speedeon Screenshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:34, 19 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:4INFO AdHaven, Measuring the ROI of Your Mobile Ad Campaign.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:4INFO AdHaven, Measuring the ROI of Your Mobile Ad Campaign.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:34, 19 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:4INFO, AdHaven Bullseye MultiScreen.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:4INFO, AdHaven Bullseye MultiScreen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:34, 19 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: 4INFO (April 28) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 
Hello! MarkMillerITPro, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Try the Wikipedia Adventure edit

The
Adventure
 

Hi MarkMillerITPro!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. This will help your editing skills.


This message was delivered by Chris Troutman (talk) 15:34, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:4INFO, Logo, 2014.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:4INFO, Logo, 2014.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:58, 1 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Talkback edit

 
Hello, MarkMillerITPro. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/4INFO.
Message added 11:27, 4 June 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Fiddle Faddle 11:27, 4 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:4INFO (June 17) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
JordanKyser22 Talk / Edits / Boxes / Subpages 20:42, 17 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your edits on 4Info edit

Hi, I noticed you've been very active on the article 4INFO
It seems you are linked to this company and therefore your edits are subject to the conflict of interest editing policies - explained here.
Please read and familiarise yourself with it. If you seek any further assistance or clarification, you can get guidance at the Teahouse.
In the meantime, I will be checking and editing the article to help improve it and will continue to monitor it.

  • confused* Who's this? TY for editing. I have no problem with the result. Wikipedia editors in Articles for Creation were very helpful. I see a spelling error. I don't plan to edit anything other than that.

MarkMillerITPro (talk) 04:35, 6 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi Mark, I notice you are still almost exclusively working on the 4INFO article. I can appreciate your keenness to use all the Wikipedia 'bells and whistles' but, in my view, the article is becoming over-worked. You've requested other people check your work (and as you know, I've already made some amendments). Because you have a possible conflict of interest (COI) it might be sensible to broaden your work on Wikipedia and maybe help with other articles instead. I'm sure you have useful knowledge and expertise to contribute!
I'm simply trying to avoid you getting into trouble. Personally I think it is excellent that you have been honest and open on your User page about your motives. However, many other editors have no tolerance for any form of COI and may begin to take a dim view.
On a separate note, it helps other editors if you leave edit summaries to explain what you have changed/added/removed. If you're doing something very uncontroversial (like correcting a spelling mistake) you can just tick the 'minor edit' box. Otherwise it is good practice to always leave a summary of what you've done. Sionk (talk) 16:57, 4 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! I have been dropping the ball on leaving summaries. *chuckle* I do like experimenting with bells and whistles. Yikes! trouble. You're right. Thank you for clear communication. MarkMillerITPro (talk) 17:03, 4 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Shoot, forgot to leave a summary on that last minor edit. MarkMillerITPro (talk) 06:22, 5 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Reference errors on 13 June edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:29, 14 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for October 1 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 4INFO, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Compliance. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 1 October 2015 (UTC)Reply


Hidden Cats edit

Hi @MarkMillerITPro:, this is just a courtesy post, if you enable hidden categories to be displayed (Special:Preferences > appearance > tickbox), you will see that "your" article is currently showing 3 hidden Cats, if you need help to fix any of these errors please let me know and I will be glad to help.The Original Filfi (talk) 23:50, 5 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

  • confused* right now our family across the nation is up in arms about my wife's 2nd bout w cancer. lots of FB, private FB, phone calls. Would you be willing to fix it? If not, ty for letting me know. #GetYourMammos MarkMillerITPro (talk) 03:48, 6 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Things calmed down. Your post made more sense to me *gee, he linked it awww 3... no time tonite, I may get back to it. Thank you very much for letting me know. MarkMillerITPro (talk) 06:28, 6 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your User page content edit

Hi Mark,

Sorry to hear about your wife's health and, of course, I hope her treatment is completely successful. However, I should warn you that you are straying away from what is acceptable content for your User page. It is not meant to be used as a diary or blog (particularly extensive personal info about other people). You can see what is and what isn't acceptable at Wikipedia:User pages#What may I not have in my user pages?. While I completely understand you will want to explain on your User page that your family is dealing with a major issue, the 'diary' element is best removed and carried on elsewhere (or at least not carried on any further) ...maybe you need to start a blog on a blogging site? All the very best. Sionk (talk) 11:50, 31 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

TY! I'll look at that later. I'm confused about the slogans. The new slogans are on the new web. Or do I put back the old slogans? MarkMillerITPro (talk) 18:10, 31 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, MarkMillerITPro. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, MarkMillerITPro. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of 4INFO edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 4INFO you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 02:41, 28 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of 4INFO edit

The article 4INFO you nominated as a good article has failed  ; see Talk:4INFO for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 10:01, 14 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

May 2018 edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  TonyBallioni (talk) 20:43, 17 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • Before the inevitable wailing and gnashing of teeth occurs, I'll explain this for you and anyone else watching in more detail. A user who has made 900 edits all basically about one page (currently 755 to 4INFO, and most of the rest of your edits are asking for help or asking questions about it) and who then creates this years later with all the promotional sourcing and churnalism and buzzwords is not here to build a neutral encyclopedia free of native advertising. As such, I have made it so you can't edit Wikipedia at all. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:51, 17 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of ZipRecruiter edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on ZipRecruiter, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:03, 17 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

*confused* edit

User talk:Sionk I'm very confused. imo the page ZipRecruiter I published is neutral. I'm blocked and can't write on your talk page. MarkMillerITPro (talk) 21:29, 17 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

  • I thought I explained this above, but I'll explain again: I'm assuming you are familiar with the term native advertising and if you aren't, you are clearly very familiar with the technique. This is why you were blocked. You created a fluff page using sources that only serve the interest of the company, including some that were likely bought by them. Additionally, 4INFO is refbombed and is written in a way that clearly puts them in the best light while trying to come off as purely informational. Taking the entirety of your editing history into account, it is very clear that you are here to promote companies. That's against our policies, so you are blocked. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:45, 17 May 2018 (UTC)Reply