Mann.benoit@gmail.com

Duplicate File:Carl h. rux 2006 by felicia megginson.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on File:Carl h. rux 2006 by felicia megginson.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because File:Carl h. rux 2006 by felicia megginson.jpg is a duplicate of an already existing article, category or image.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting File:Carl h. rux 2006 by felicia megginson.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 07:00, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Carl hancock rux 2006.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Carl hancock rux 2006.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:24, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Carlhrux.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Carlhrux.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 05:28, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Good Bread Alley cover.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Good Bread Alley cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 23:02, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Carlhancockruxandcompanytempationsaintanthony.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Carlhancockruxandcompanytempationsaintanthony.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:File-Rux,.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:File-Rux,.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:51, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Paganoperetta200.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Paganoperetta200.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Skier Dude  ►  02:52, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

June 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions, including your edits to Christopher Walken. However, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article, or any other Wikipedia page, must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for instructions. Thank you. William Avery (talk) 20:37, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Image002 4.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Image002 4.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Eeekster (talk) 02:25, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Scene from Carl Hancock Rux's Talk.tif

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Scene from Carl Hancock Rux's Talk.tif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Looking at your talk page, this appears to be a persistent problem. Please stop claiming images as your own that do not belong to you. Rather, please try to find either free images or fair use rationales for the images. Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 03:13, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

November 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. However, I noticed that your username (Mann.benoit@gmail.com) may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it's contains an email address. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account to use for editing. Thank you. Breawycker public (talk) main account (talk) 01:26, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Good Bread Alley

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Good Bread Alley, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.allmusic.com/album/good-bread-alley-mw0000533683, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Good Bread Alley and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Good Bread Alley, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Good Bread Alley with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Good Bread Alley. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Good Bread Alley saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Chris the Paleontologist (talk • contribs) 20:38, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

'self made images'

Hi. I see you've uploaded File:Carl hancock Rux Rux Revue.jpg and File:Carl Hancock Rux Good Bread Alley CD Cover.jpg. In both cases you claim these are your own work. Unless you actually designed the CD covers (and have copyright over the photo) I don't believe these are your work. Certainly scanning an image in, or uploading it does not count. Can you explain why you think these are your work? If you don't we'll delete them. Secretlondon (talk) 20:44, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Single Purpose Account

You clearly have another account User:Mann.benoit and together you are clearly only editing on one topic - Carl Hancock Rux. I'm guessing you are this guy's manager or promoter. I've blocked the other account I'm now trying to find all your suspect uploads. Secretlondon (talk) 21:33, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:CarlHancockRuxphotographHarlemStageGala.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CarlHancockRuxphotographHarlemStageGala.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Secretlondon (talk) 21:41, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Carl hancock Rux Rux Revue.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Carl hancock Rux Rux Revue.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Secretlondon (talk) 21:41, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Carl Hancock Rux Good Bread Alley CD Cover.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Carl Hancock Rux Good Bread Alley CD Cover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Secretlondon (talk) 21:45, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Meshell Ndegeocello Tamar-kali Carl Hancock Rux.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Meshell Ndegeocello Tamar-kali Carl Hancock Rux.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Secretlondon (talk) 21:46, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:CarlHancockRuxRubyDee.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CarlHancockRuxRubyDee.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Secretlondon (talk) 21:46, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Carl Hancock Rux, New Yorker's Against Fracking Concert, May 2012.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Carl Hancock Rux, New Yorker's Against Fracking Concert, May 2012.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Secretlondon (talk) 21:47, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

June 2012

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Fort Greene, Brooklyn. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Cresix (talk) 16:21, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Cresix (talk) 16:25, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Carl Hancock Rux, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages George Clinton and Lady Sings The Blues (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:33, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)