This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
The assumption of bad faith in this closing statement is both childish and ironic. The nominator has a track record that includes dozens (and dozens) of bad-faith nominations based on (by her own account) years-old notability tags and zero regard for WP:BEFORE. That you think my pointing that out is the problem (and the example of bad faith there) is laughable. St★lwart111 05:25, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Ey up, have you heard of 'multi-tasking' or "here’s one I prepared earlier”? 'Assume good faith' is a longstanding, fundamental principle of Wikipedia. I saw none of that in your comments, which ended in an implicit threat of a block. And I ignored them as it did not address the article. You were ignored. If you make a habit of those kind of comments, it wouldn’t surprised me if someone was compiling a list of diffs. Just stop it. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:43, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
They have acknowledged that isn't the case and have refused to defend any of their nominations where that was clearly not the case. They have explained their (incredibly flawed) process and have since essentially stopped nominating via that process, reducing the need for a block to prevent disruption. But I absolutely threatened a block per WP:DE. I'll keep making those comments as long as editors like that keep disrupting the project. Diffs are definitely being collected. When even the editor in question won't defend their own behaviour, your aspersions about good faith are misdirected. St★lwart111 04:29, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Thanks, and XL5??
Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Thanks so much for the IP block - they were getting to be a mild pain. Erm ... XL5 as in Fireball XL5??? Or have I missed the memo? Cheers DBaK (talk) 08:34, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Haha! You’re the first person to make that connection and you’re right! Fireball XL5 popped into my head when I wanted some random characters to tag onto my username. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:12, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Brilliant ... it is because I am ooooooold, I suspect. I did rather love it on first broadcast. My older brother had the ?Airfix plastic kit, which was very fine indeed. Eventually the friction joint between the nose and the main section wore out so it wouldn't lock in any more, but it was great while it lasted! Cheers DBaK (talk) 22:59, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Another hoax list request
Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Phase 2 of the 2021 RfA review has commenced which will discuss potential solutions to address the 8 issues found in Phase 1. Proposed solutions that achieve consensus will be implemented and you may propose solutions till 07 November 2021.
Latest comment: 2 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
Hi! Contacting about undeletion of the page "Alvix" ([for deletion/Alvix|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alvix]) This page belongs to a musician with millions of streams and alot of online article who is notable. It is not a promo-page. He is mentioned in some of biggest swedish newspapers and is covered in alot of international weblogs. A online search provide everything... Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sdgsnti (talk • contribs) 19:49, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello Sdgsnti. The page Alvix was deleted following a short but unanimous discussion. All very straightforward. But you say there is a lot of coverage? Bearing in mind that the notability guideline that was cited in the discussion requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject", can you link to the three best sources about Alvix? --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:58, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
The guy has alot of online articles and info of this artist online. He has been releasing with stars both in Sweden and international like Chris Willis. He has been in the top official charts in a few countries..
I mentioned three sources because the community is usually content with three in-depth, high quality sources for an article but I see nothing in-depth here, nothing that would allow me to overturn the community's consensus in the deletion discussion. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:21, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Welcome to the one hundred and sixty third WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 17,270 last month to 17,376 on 7 November 2021). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 205 is ahead of WP:GM who have 91. WP:YORKS also has the lead in FAs at 87 while WP:GM has 70 out of a total number of 4,695 articles.
Currently we have seventy Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
Newsletter
At a member's request a new option has been made available for the newsletter delivery. If you do not want the full text of the newsletter delivering each month you can now opt to have just a link to the newsletter sent to your talk page. You can select this option by using L in the Newsletter column against your name on the project members list.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The November 2021 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no nominations on the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!
Delivered November 2021 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
21:47, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Welcome to the one hundred and sixty fourth WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 17,376 last month to 17,458 on 29 November 2021). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 204 is ahead of WP:GM who have 91. WP:YORKS also has the lead in FAs at 88 while WP:GM has 70 out of a total number of 4,696 articles.
Currently we have seventy one Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
Happy Christmas
Just to say thanks for all the effort put in by members on articles covering the Yorkshire area and to wish everyone a Happy Christmas. It is time to take a break and to spend some time with family and friends. May be even to indulge yourself in the food and drink that abounds at this time of year or even make that occasional visit to a church. What ever you do over the festive season enjoy it and see you next year.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The December 2021 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no nominations on the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!
Delivered December 2021 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
18:17, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – December 2021
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Unregistered editors using the mobile website are now able to receive notices to indicate they have talk page messages. The notice looks similar to what is already present on desktop, and will be displayed on when viewing any page except mainspace and when editing any page. (T284642)
The limit on the number of emails a user can send per day has been made global instead of per-wiki to help prevent abuse. (T293866)
The already authorized standard discretionary sanctions for all pages relating to the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes), broadly construed, have been made permanent.
A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Merchandise giveaway nomination
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
A token of thanks
Hi Malcolmxl5! I've nominated you (along with all other active admins) to receive a solstice season gift from the WMF. Talk page stalkers are invited to comment at the nomination. Enjoy! Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}}talk ~~~~~
Following consensus at the 2021 RfA review, the autopatrolled user right has been removed from the administrators user group; admins can grant themselves the autopatrolled permission if they wish to remain autopatrolled.
The functionaries email list (functionaries-enlists.wikimedia.org) will no longer accept incoming emails apart from those sent by list members and WMF staff. Private concerns, apart from those requiring oversight, should be directly sent to the Arbitration Committee.
You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.
When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.
Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.
We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.
Welcome to the one hundred and sixty fifth WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 17,458 last month to 17,514 on 2 January 2022). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 204 is ahead of WP:GM who have 91. WP:YORKS also has the lead in FAs at 88 while WP:GM has 69 out of a total number of 4,703 articles.
Currently we have seventy one Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
Happy New Year
Just a Happy New Year to all those active members of he Yorkshire project, hope you all had a good time over the Festive period and are ready for the new year. Hopefully it will not be as disrupive as the previous couple of years.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The January 2022 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no nominations on the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!
Delivered January 2022 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
Welcome to the one hundred and sixty sixth WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 17,514 last month to 17,579 on 28 January 2022). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 204 is ahead of WP:GM who have 91. WP:YORKS also has the lead in FAs at 87 while WP:GM has 69 out of a total number of 4,715 articles.
Currently we have seventy Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The February 2022 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no nominations on the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!
Delivered February 2022 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
17:48, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – February 2022
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The user group oversight will be renamed suppress in around 3 weeks. This will not affect the name shown to users and is simply a change in the technical name of the user group. The change is being made for technical reasons. You can comment in Phabricator if you have objections.
The Reply Tool feature, which is a part of Discussion Tools, will be opt-out for everyone logged in or logged out starting 7 February 2022. Editors wishing to comment on this can do so in the relevant Village Pump discussion.
Thanks, I’ve not heard of that one. I’ve reblocked for a month. I see Crikey! It's the Irwins has been semi-protected for a while. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 08:45, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi @Paul 012:. I’m slowly working my way through these and will persevere with them today. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:48, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for the effort. Persevere is quite the word; cleaning up such damage unfortunately is tedious work indeed. --Paul_012 (talk) 12:34, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
All done, I think, Paul_012. 45 in total, let me know if I’ve missed any. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 08:22, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Welcome to the one hundred and sixty seventh WikiProject Yorkshire monthly newsletter.
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 17,579 last month to 17,593 on 28 February 2022). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 204 is ahead of WP:GM who have 91. WP:YORKS also has the lead in FAs at 87 while WP:GM has 69 out of a total number of 4,722 articles.
Currently we have seventy Yorkshire featured articles:
The number has been kept deliberately low to give us a fighting chance of improving them to at least GA status, also so we can concentrate our efforts on these first.
WikiProject Yorkshire Collaboration of the Month Project
The March 2022 articles selected below are an editor choice as there were no nominations on the project talk page.
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Moves Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Thanks
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Would you like to write the next newsletter for WP:YORKS? Please nominate yourself at WT:YORKS! New editors are always welcome!
Delivered March 2022 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
23:02, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – March 2022
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
A RfC is open to discuss prohibiting draftification of articles over 90 days old.
Technical news
The deployment of the reply tool as an opt-out feature, as announced in last month's newsletter, has been delayed to 7 March. Feedback and comments are being welcomed at Wikipedia talk:Talk pages project. (T296645)
Guideline and policy news
Technical news
Arbitration
Miscellaneous
Administrator changes
lists.wikimedia.org) will no longer accept incoming emails apart from those sent by list members and WMF staff. Private concerns, apart from those requiring oversight, should be directly sent to the Arbitration Committee.
