Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2021 in Uzbekistan sport

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:2021 in Uzbekistan sport indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:21, 17 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy tagging

edit

You have insufficient experience to speedy tag pages, so please don't do it anymore.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:13, 21 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Nabi Mammadov

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nabi Mammadov requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nabi Mammadov. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Bbb23 (talk) 21:29, 21 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:41, 21 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Help

edit

Hi Ponyo.Yes, I used multiple accounts.I have blocked by you,I appreciate you,but i didn't do anything bad with these accounts.i was just creating an article and it was getting deleted every time.The article I created was neither an article containing harmful information nor an article containing vandalism, it was just a biography of an athlete.I have a few questions for you regarding this deleted article.I think there is some illogicality in Wikipedia's rules.Pomyo -I first created the article (Nabi Mammadov) 2 months ago, it was deleted via deletion discussion.i was an amateur at wikipedia back then but I went and learned all the criteria, notability guidelines and I have perfectly recreated article with all of its references added. If you are someone who is interested in sports, I think you know how notable an athlete who wins a medal in the European championship , Wikipedia has thousands of such athletes' articles.What i mean you is they just delete the recreated article without review because of the deletion discuss page archive.They show the reason that the content of the deleted page and the new page are the same, but I can swear that it is not the same.Do you think it is right to delete the newly created article without reviewing it just because it has a deletion discussion archive?I am sure that you will carefully read what I wrote and make the right decision. Best Regards! — Preceding unsigned comment added by MMAmonster10 (talkcontribs)

  • "...i didn't do anything bad with these accounts.i was just creating an article and it was getting deleted every time". That's bad. You violated our policies regarding multiple accounts to evade blocks and continue creating an article that was deleted via consensus, which is blatant disruption. The previous deletion discussion is barely relevant at this point as any edit you make while evading your original block can be reverted and deleted on sight per WP:BANREVERT. As you have now evaded your block on two occasions (i.e User:ASHLEYWON11 and this account) since your original block, you are considered banned. The standard offer is available, but only if you stop creating new accounts to evade your blocks.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 17:32, 22 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

- Ponyo Yes sir you are right, i am willing to take my punishment.The subject I want to talk about is another.Does the fact that an article has a deletion discussion page mean I will never be able to create it? I was inexperienced and amateur when I first created the page.But when I created it for the second time, it was completely ok, the article I created was not an ordinary human article, it belonged to someone notable enough.The recreated article was deleted without any review just because it was a deletion discussion page.Ponyo-The article meets the general notability criteria, athlete is martial artist, meets martial arts notability, but the only obstacle, the only reason for deletion is the deletion discussion page. This is the article that caused the deletion(Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nabi Mammadov)but this discussion has nothing to do with my recreatead article.This is from an article with the same name but different content. Please understand me sir. I'm having trouble explaining my problem.This article belongs to an athlete, it was true that it did not meet the criteria when it was deleted with the deletion discussion.however, the medals and awards gradually increase in the careers of the athletes.Please remove the protection on Nabi Mammadov article.I want to improve and create the article when my ban expires and I wish the old deletion discussion page be removed or the article will be unfairly deleted again without review.I promise I will never use multiple accounts again. I will be glad if you reply Ponyo

Ponyo

"2021 European Sambo Championships" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 2021 European Sambo Championships. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 3#2021 European Sambo Championships until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Deancarmeli (talk) 13:54, 3 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

"2021 World Sambo Championships" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 2021 World Sambo Championships. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 12#2021 World Sambo Championships until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Deancarmeli (talk) 07:20, 12 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

"2022 World Sambo Championships" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 2022 World Sambo Championships. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 12#2022 World Sambo Championships until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Deancarmeli (talk) 07:25, 12 October 2021 (UTC)Reply