User talk:Lubaf/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Imho,
Regardless of whether those editors are still around or not, it is not very nice to mention them by name. For instance, WP:POINT does not contain a list of people who have breached it, and WP:BLOCK does not list people deopped for abuse of blocking policy, and WP:CIV does not list people who are frequently incivil. A good guideline does not need to get personal on people. >Radiant< 22:31, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
NO DELETE!!!
On the bad s articles that shouldn't be created page you deleted my stuff. JUST BECAUSE IT ISN'T FUNNY TO YOU DOESN'T MEAN IT WASN'T FUNNY TO THE FIFTY OR SO PEOPLE I SHOWED IT TOO! THEY ALL LAUGHED! H-BOMB 22:24, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
Your input is requested
Your input would be appreciated at this Request for Comments. Kelly Martin (talk) 17:17, 6 December 2006 (UTC) Tell me about it.User:Fiolexgirl44
Could you look at something for me?
I don't want to sway you in one direction or the other on this topic, but could I get you to look at this, then give me your honest opinion?
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Sue Rangell/B.R.I.T.T.A.N.I.C.A.
Sue Rangell[citation needed] 18:24, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Wikipedia:Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on [[Talk:Wikipedia:Wikipedia is an encyclopedia|its talk page]]. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Eddie (talk/contribs) 18:03, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
About And Now This...
I noticed you've been marking all the entries about "And Now This..." as a hoax. It's incredibly difficult to prove the show's existance, let alone the content. The sole mention I can find of it on the internet is here: [1]
- "She has also been in numerous television commercials and shows including the soap opera One Life To Live, Nickelodeon’s And Now This..., and the voice of Queen Latifah, and Robin Quivers on MTV’s Celebrity Death Match".
Though it might (ie., does) constitute as original research, I'm going to try and contact Viacom/Nickelodeon and see if they will even acknowledge the existance of the show in the first place. ShadowMan1od 00:57, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, it's hard to find any information at all. For a while I thought I was actually going insane and imagined the show. I'll hunt around. ShadowMan1od 00:46, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
Very amusing :) Raul654 19:39, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- Does my addition of C works enough in keeping the anagram? Circeus 20:52, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Your edit to a recent WP:MFD of User:TV-VCR/Vandalism
Please do not insult the signature of other users. It's not nice. YechielMan 14:09, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
New policy that could use your attention
Wikipedia:Newcomers are delicious, so go ahead and bite them Raul654 19:28, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
WP:LAME
The other one is also incredibly insensitive ("rants" "piss him off" "D'oh!" "immune to deletion") and does not treat the subject very fairly. hbdragon88 03:24, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Alright, lets not get silly with this nonsense. I guess if you want to write some poems, you can, but why don't you rename WP:HAIKU to just make it poems instead, and you can merge the two? Honestly, we have an encyclopedia to write and we are wasting time with something so trivial. — Moe ε 05:27, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Harassment
I think the behavioural guidliine is reading clearer and stronger now. Good sharing the interest with you. --Ziji 
(talk email) 11:39, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
Barnstar
|
The Special Barnstar | |
| For your hilarious Wikipedia essays, I, Sharkface217, hereby present to you this barnstar. --Sharkface217 04:14, 5 September 2007 (UTC) |
Your work deserves this. You'll have to accept on behalf of your work. :-P Sharkface217 04:14, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
IAR
*nudge*
Did you know that you've gone an entire month without touching the article space?—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 23:51, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
A tag for Wikipedia:The Zen of Wikipedia.
WARNING: This essay may contain egoistic foolishness Do not accept it as true, unless you know it is true, yourself. Please be diligent and read it mindfully. |
Is this OK with you? I created it for my own essays, but I thought it was appropriate there. 
☯ Zenwhat (talk) 23:31, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
|
The Surreal Barnstar | |
| The greatest piece of "policy" ever written. Very clever. I did indeed laugh out loud. Here's a barnstar for the effort. ♠PMC♠ 08:22, 7 May 2007 (UTC) |
You've already gotten a barnstar for this, so I won't add another... But I just saw this and laughed my ass off. Thanks for writing this essay! - Stephanie Daugherty (Triona) - Talk - Comment - 22:12, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- Classical liberal extremism was called “libertarianism” long before there was a Libertarian Party, which was named for the movement rather than the other way around.
- Libertarian socialism was not called “libertarian” in 1850; it was called “libertaire”. The fact that “libertaire” was later translated with “libertarian” doesn't change that.
- WP:LAME isn't supposed to be a place where editors take revenge upon those with whose particular side they disagreed during an edit war. And there is no place on Wikipedia for insinuating misconception.
Please leave WP:LAME#Libertarian socialism neutral. —SlamDiego←T 03:13, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
ZAngband
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article ZAngband, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Gazimoff (talk) 09:15, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I'm puzzled as to why you thought that this edit was vandalism? Fireice (talk) 15:35, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Interprets
I've just created the "essay|interprets". Tell me what exaclty you don't like about it, maybe it could be easily fixed. --Kubanczyk (talk) 10:26, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Please be a giant dick, so we can ban you
Wikipedia:Please be a giant dick, so we can ban you, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Please be a giant dick, so we can ban you and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Please be a giant dick, so we can ban you during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Talktome(Intelati) 05:28, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia:05ArbElecRC listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:05ArbElecRC. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:05ArbElecRC redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). — This, that, and the other (talk) 00:32, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
For the record
ENGAGE RIDLEY M0THER FUCKER is not a valid Metroid password, but ENGAGE RIDLEY MOTHER FUCKER with the capital-oh is. (Insofar as it passes the checksum but the game doesn't actually run). hare j 01:20, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
November 2016
A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. 2600:1:B15E:A34:B1B9:4EAA:B89E:E610 (talk) 01:23, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
- Lubaf, ignore this nonsense warning. ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 01:34, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Lubaf. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Please be a giant dick, so we can ban you
Wikipedia:Please be a giant dick, so we can ban you, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Please be a giant dick, so we can ban you (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Please be a giant dick, so we can ban you during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. XfDWatcher (talk) 19:25, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Lubaf. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Lubaf. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)