December 2023 edit

 

Your recent editing history at Peter Schiff shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Wikipedia is strict about not edit-warring, you're at 3 reverts within 24 hours and you will probably end up blocked from editing if you continue to revert. Wikipedia is a collabortive editing project, you need to follow WP:BRD which is when your Bold changes have been Reverted, you need to start a Discussion on the article talk page and seek consensus for your changes. Ravensfire (talk) 03:43, 21 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion edit

  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Lovemjseo reported by User:Ravensfire (Result: ). Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 03:49, 21 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

December 2023 edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 05:06, 21 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
what is my reason to being block indefinitely?
I just wrote the truth. the other side engaged in the same manner. Lovemjseo (talk) 05:39, 21 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
You're not going to get unblocked like that. I suggest you read the guide to appealing blocks, which is linked above. TarnishedPathtalk 07:17, 21 December 2023 (UTC)Reply