LolaHowells
Welcome edit
|
Reliable Sources edit
- Hey! Thanks for reaching me out. I've been around for a while now and i have been getting the hang of things. However, i'll love to learn more.LolaHowells (talk) 06:47, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi Lola,
Thanks for adding to the Dash wikipedia, but it's really important that we stick to what wikipedia considers to be 'reliable sources'. Crypto news outlets are almost all considered unreliable, with the exception of CoinDesk. Cointelegraph technically should not be used in the article either, but it's a borderline case and I seem to be getting away with using it in combination with other sources. AMBCrypto and Dash Force News are definitely not permissible sources.
There are various pages detailing wikipedia's policies, but a quick summary for reliable sources is that we're looking for sources that have an editorial policy and publish corrections when it becomes clear that information they have previously published is incorrect. This means mainstream media like TV stations, newspapers, magazines like Forbes, books from reputable publishers, but not what the wikipedia mods call 'crypto rags' and also not 'promotional organisations' like Dash Force News (although personally I agree with what they write and think they have a lot of integrity).
If you look at the talk page for the article, you will see the long history of edits and get a sense of how difficult it is to make changes without triggering wikipedia's moderators. I don't want to see the article get deleted again (this happened once already) so please be careful!
- Thanks for briefly explaining the rules. I'll definitely dig it more to avoid such mistake again.LolaHowells (talk) 05:57, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello, LolaHowells. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
- disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.
- Hi, As I am myself an Engineering student I do researches and write thesis. and during my research I found out about some Crypto Firms and they seemingly fit the Wikipedia's criteria. So I drafted an article and posted it here. I look forward to contribution and I am open for discussions. I appriiate that you guys are guiding me. I will thoroughly go through the links and see how I can improve it.LolaHowells (talk) 05:44, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the blockchain and cryptocurrencies. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.
General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.MER-C 06:26, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Coinfirm is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coinfirm until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 23:02, 28 November 2018 (UTC)