December 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Euromaidan because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 13:46, 16 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Plywood over Paris edit

 

The article Plywood over Paris has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and why would we add foreign phrases to the English-language Wikipedia?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sjö (talk) 06:45, 23 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Esoteric symbolism edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Esoteric symbolism requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Tagishsimon (talk) 00:16, 25 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Esoteric symbolism moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Esoteric symbolism, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. AaronWikia (talk) 00:30, 25 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

November 2018 edit

  Hello, I'm DVdm. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Mount Fuji, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DVdm (talk) 12:03, 25 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Cherry blossom. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. DVdm (talk) 12:03, 25 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Death and the Maiden (motif). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DVdm (talk) 12:03, 25 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use talk pages for inappropriate discussions, as you did at Wikipedia talk:Five pillars. DVdm (talk) 12:04, 25 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

  • Indeed. If you edit war further at Wikipedia talk:Five pillars, you will be blocked. Also if you insert further supposedly "well-known facts" without providing sources. Bishonen | talk 12:50, 25 November 2018 (UTC).Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Euromaidan. Adding tags to articles without any explanation as you did here is not acceptable. - DVdm (talk) 06:52, 27 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Esoteric symbolism edit

 

Hello, LllKSTlll. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Esoteric symbolism".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:30, 26 May 2019 (UTC)Reply