Hello, Lincolnspencer. You have new messages at Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/June_Julian.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your submission at Articles for creation: June Julian has been accepted edit

 
June Julian, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

WordSeventeen (talk) 12:35, 26 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Lincolnspencer (talk) 17:50, 6 September 2015 (UTC) Lincolnspencer (talk) 17:53, 6 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

re: article for deletion - June Julian edit

Please see the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/June Julian, to which you are welcome to contribute. Please read WP:ARTIST, and please note that arguments (claims) like WP:ITSIMPORTANT are not enough. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:18, 7 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

You can, of course, add comments there, as well as a vote. You can keep improving the article. If the consensus is leaning towards deletion, I suggest you request userfication so that your work is not gone. And, once again, please read WP:ARTIST/WP:PROF, and note that not all artists, nor academics, are encyclopedic. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 23:52, 7 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • I am sorry, I do not have the power to restore it. The discussion was open for a week; if you did not have time to contribute to it in that time, I am afraid there is little I can do. You can go to WP:AN and request userfication of the article, so you can improve it in your userspace. Which, I note, is what I already said above. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:21, 14 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: June Julian (October 30) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KGirlTrucker81 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 18:24, 30 October 2016 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Lincolnspencer, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 18:24, 30 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

MfD nomination of Draft:June Julian edit

  Draft:June Julian, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:June Julian and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:June Julian during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 23:39, 4 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

June Julian edit

My article, June Julian, was deleted a while ago. I would like to restore it and add new verified content in the new category of Women Artists. With appreciation for your help, Lincoln SpencerLincolnspencer (talk) 17:48, 30 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

The first step is to request that the deleting admin (Samwalton9) undelete the page. If they decline, then you should go to DRV and request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it. If you want more help, change the {{help me-helped}} back into a {{help me}}, stop by the Teahouse, Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 23:04, 27 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
I've restored the page to Draft:June Julian. Feel free to work on it there, but make sure to address the issues raised at the deletion discussion. Sam Walton (talk) 23:16, 27 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

MfD nomination of Draft:June Julian edit

  Draft:June Julian, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:June Julian (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:June Julian during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 00:16, 25 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:June Julian NYC Gallery Opening.jpg edit

 

The file File:June Julian NYC Gallery Opening.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 23 December 2019 (UTC)Reply