ITN credit edit

Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 07:27, 12 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject assessment tags for talk pages edit

  Thank you for your recent articles, including Henryk Derczyński, which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like {{WikiProject Keyword}} to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Wikipedia:Article alerts and other tools. This can help you too, as the WikiProject members will often defend your work from deletion and try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:32, 17 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! This is very useful to know. Leondz (talk) 12:10, 17 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Diacritics edit

Also, please remember to use diacritics; it is Derczyński not Derczynski. I have moved and copyedited the article accordingly. Once again, thank you for the article. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:32, 17 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

While that might be true on Polish wikipedia, us Derczynskis operating in English often elide the acute accent. ;) Leondz (talk) 12:09, 17 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Flight RFL111 edit

Hello, I wrote the section "Search and rescue", but I'm not native English. I would appreciate if you review the text written by me. --Turbojet (talk) 18:03, 27 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Sure. The letter from the EENA was interesting, and I was hoping someone would integrate it; thank you. Leondz (talk) 18:12, 27 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. :-) --Turbojet (talk) 18:58, 27 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Talkback edit

 
Hello, Leondz. You have new messages at [[User talk:Qwertyus#Named entity recognition|Qwertyus's talk page]].
Message added 17:20, 3 March 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

QVVERTYVS (hm?) 17:20, 3 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure! edit

 
Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 05:27, Thursday, May 2, 2024 (UTC)

The word 'country' edit

Hello Leondz I noted that you have touched on the meaning of this word at the talk page of MH370. Would you be interested to take a look at Talk:List of tram and light rail transit systems, Talk:List of metro systems and Talk:List of tallest buildings in the world too, as well as the recent edit history of World's busiest airports by passenger traffic? Thanks. 116.48.155.127 (talk) 14:24, 12 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi hello? 116.48.155.127 (talk) 16:30, 18 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the invitation. I'm not sure exactly where you'd like me to contribute Leondz (talk) 10:25, 19 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Art and Artificial Intelligence edit

Leon, you probably already know about this, but when you have a chance, please check out the additions to the "Criticism and comment" section of Deep Learning and the article referenced therein -- I would rather that my friends take the first shots at all of this! And be sure to take a look at the first footnote of the article proper. Synchronist (talk) 00:01, 29 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Update: Dragan has already cracked the whip, and I am groaning under it! Synchronist (talk) 18:13, 29 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Pan Am Flight 121 edit

Hi there, I just spotted that you created Pan Am Flight 121. I've previously expanded the Gene Roddenberry article (with the split to Early life and career of Gene Roddenberry where I included quite a bit of information on 121. I didn't go into as much detail as I could of as I felt it was going off topic (and your new article would be a much better place for it).

But the real reason why I came here was to point you towards openlibrary.org - it's free to sign up, and one of the free ebooks you can borrow there is the David Alexander biography of Roddenberry that I used in my articles (it's where I got the source from). It'll have a fair amount of information on Flight 121 there. Miyagawa (talk) 23:04, 17 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

WP:AIRCRASH / WP:AIRPORTS accidents / incidents criteria edit

Hi Leondz,

Thanks for your talk page message, and your edits to London City Airport. However I fail to see how this can be considered a misapplication of the project criteria, which are fairly unambiguous and state:

Accidents or incidents at the airport should only be included in airport articles if:
  • The accident caused human fatalities.
  • The accident involved hull loss or serious damage to the aircraft or airport.
  • The accident or incident invoked a change in procedures, regulations or process that had a wide effect on other airports or airlines or the aircraft industry

(see the relevant sections of WP:AIRCRASH / WP:AIRPORTS).

By those criteria, only the first incident is notable for inclusion (hull loss). The criteria were established some time ago to avoid airport and airline articles becoming cluttered with minor, non-notable incidents such as burst tyres and bent nose wheels, which while interesting to some don't really have any encyclopaedic notability. Hope it makes sense. Thanks! SempreVolando (talk) 08:33, 10 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, appreciate your thorough & patient response! I'll recheck the AAIB reports -- certainly not everything meets these. Leondz (talk) 14:10, 11 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

ITN recognition for Emirates Flight 521 edit

On 4 August 2016, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Emirates Flight 521, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. The Rambling Man (talk) 04:44, 4 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Leondz. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

The WikiEagle - January 2022 edit

 
The WikiEagle
The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter
Volume I — Issue 1
Aviation Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Outreach • The WikiEagle
Announcements
  • After over a decade of silence, the WikiProject Aviation newsletter is making a comeback under the name The WikiEagle. This first issue was sent to all active members of the project and its sub-projects. If you wish to continue receiving The WikiEagle, you can add your username to the mailing list. For now the newsletter only covers general project news and is run by only one editor. If you wish to help or to become a columnist, please let us know. If you have an idea which you believe would improve the newsletter, please share it; suggestions are welcome and encouraged.
  • On 16 December, an RfC was closed which determined theaerodrome.com to be an unreliable source. The website, which is cited over 1,500 articles, mainly on WWI aviation, as of the publishing of this issue.
  • Luft46.com has been added to the list of problematic sources after this discussion.
  • The Jim Lovell article was promoted to Featured Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Hawkeye7.
  • The Raymond Hesselyn article was promoted to Good Article status on 4 December after being nominated by Zawed.
  • The Supermarine Sea King article was promoted to Good Article status on 22 December after being nominated by Amitchell125.
  • The William Hodgson (RAF officer) article was promoted to Good Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Zawed.
Members

New Members

Number of active members: 386. Total number of members: 921.

Closed Discussions


  Featured Article assessment

  Good Article assessment

  Deletion

  Requested moves

Article Statistics
This data reflects values from DMY.
New/Ongoing Discussions

On The Main Page


Did you know...

Discuss & propose changes to The WikiEagle at The WikiEagle talk page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from the mailing list.
Newsletter contributor: ZLEA

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 1 January 2022 (UTC)Reply