Welcome edit

Hello, LeoStephenTwain, and Welcome to Wikipedia!    

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

LeoStephenTwain, good luck, and have fun. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 08:08, 9 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: NSE co-location scam has been accepted edit

 
NSE co-location scam, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 09:38, 9 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

NSE co-location scam edit

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article NSE co-location scam has been completed with some caveats.

I found several instances when I checked citations to clarify in my own mind what the text was trying to convey that a) the text had been plagiarised by a contributor, or b) the text was not supported by the citation provided. I did fix several incidents of plagiarism.

Given these two circumstances I suggest that you go through the article again and insure that each piece of text is supported by the citation provided and that it is worded sufficiently differently from the text that it cannot be construed as plagiarism

Several citations have been used repeatedly and cited in full rather than being named and cited accordingly when used again. This should also be fixed.

Finally, as a non-Indian I wonder why the article is not titled "National Stock Exchange of India co-location scam"? NSE meant nothing to me until I began reading the article. If one were searching for an article on the subject I would guess the key words would be "national stock exchange". Just a thought.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 15:56, 21 November 2018 (UTC)Reply


Hello Twofingered Typist,

Let me begin by thanking you for cleaning up the page.

As far as plagiarism is concerned, I have started checking the article and making necessary changes regarding the same after having already fixed the one citation mentioned by you. Additionally, will fix the reuse of citations as well.

To answer your question, National Stock Exchange of India is widely referred to by its acronym NSE. As one may find, several or virtually all news articles use the abbreviation instead of the full name since it is well established in the stock market and otherwise that NSE stands for the said stock exchange in India. I presume that NSE must be as common a keyword as its full form.

Furthermore, as you might already know that the article was Rated C-class, low importance. I was wondering the procedure and the right time to nominate it for an improved, yet appropriate, class/article. It would be great if you could put some light on that.

Thank you.