Ladygaga328

July 2014

Hello, I'm Piguy101. Your recent edit to the page Central Valley (California) appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Piguy101 (talk) 02:04, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I noticed that you made a change to an article, Metallica, but you did not provide any reliable source(s). In the future be sure to include a citation when making such changes. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial. Thank you. -Fnlayson (talk) 02:03, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

I have a source I just need a little help inputting it, if you could help me that would be very much appreciated!!!

It needs to meet Wikipedia's reliable source criteria. Use the Metallica article's talk page if you have further questions. -Fnlayson (talk) 16:14, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Ladygaga328. You have new messages at Piguy101's talk page.
Message added 02:58, 9 July 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Piguy101 (talk) 02:58, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Map of San Joaquin Valley.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Map of San Joaquin Valley.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 08:55, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Fresno, California edits

Hi. I reverted a couple of your edits on Fresno, at least two of which (the location of the city within the valley, and stating that Fresno is in Northern California), were clearly incorrect. Regarding the difference between the valleys, the more specific San Joaquin is better used. The rule of thumb should be, if you can be more specific, than why not? To go the other route, you could simply say that Fresno was located on the West Coast. Obviously, I am not the only editor who thinks your changes are incorrect. If you feel that your version is more precise, discuss it on the talk page of the article in question. If a consensus of editors agree with you, than it will be changed. Hope this helps. Happy editing! Onel5969 (talk) 18:07, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

August 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Lil B, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. STATic message me! 20:29, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors, as you did on User talk:STATicVapor. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. STATic message me! 01:26, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Stop reverting my edits and there will be no issues or be reported your choice (:

Stop putting incorrect information in articles, or removing relevant information, and you will stop being reverted by myself and others. For instance, your assumption that the Greater San Francisco Bay Area must be bigger than the San Francisco Bay Area is wrong. If you want to discuss that idea then first find some reliable sources. Binksternet (talk) 21:26, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Actually honey, I'm not putting incorrect information nor am I removing relevant information, you all need to stop reverting my edits. The metro area of San francisco pages need a lot of editing especially when every other citys metro area articles have no issues and are fine, the greater San francisco area and the San Francisco Bay Area are the same thing

Apparently you have been warned about this several times: If you want people to stop reverting your edits, please start citing sources (see Wikipedia:Citing sources). Wikipedia does not accept original thought or personal knowledge, or a "synthesis of published material" by reaching a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources. Although you may believe what you are adding is true, all content must be verifiable by a reliable source. Others must be able to double check what you add, or they will revert on those grounds -- lack of explicit evidence. That is the consequence of having a web site where "everyone can edit". Where's your proof that Metallica actually formed in San Francisco instead of LA? Where's your proof that people commonly refer to Fresno as part of NoCal? Where's your proof that people commonly refer to the "Greater SF Bay Area" as the 12-county Combined Stat Area (as defined by the OMB) instead of the traditional 9-county region? If someone asks for proof and a reliable source, the burden is on you to provide it.

Furthermore, please follow the Wikipedia's civility policy. If you continue to make personal attacks and use the f-bomb, that may be grounds for this account to be blocked (see Wikipedia:Blocking policy, especially Wikipedia:Blocking policy#Common rationales for blocks). Thanks. Zzyzx11 (talk) 00:52, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Are you kidding me? You know what I won't even bother with an idiot like you, you are pathetic. THAT IS A FLAT OUT FACT METALLICA ORIGINATED IN SAN FRANCISCO LOOK IT UP! And whether Fresno is commonly referred to as NORCAL and not nocal which it is commonly referred to is irrelevant because Fresno is in Northern California, also the census and OMB call it the greater San Francisco Bay Area. You obviously are some no life loser who thinks they know everything when you fucking don't you once again are a pathetic idiot not knowing where Metallica is from and the fact you called it nocal just goes to show you have no buisness writing about articles you don't know a flying fuck about. Go educate yourself please because everything I state is fact and common sense might want to get yourself together because I can't deal with idiots like you so go ahead and block me because I have tons of accounts to log into. Also I'm so sorry you can't handle an F BOMB but fuck is a word and I will use it as much as I want freedom of speech. PS: once again nothing I write is my opinion it's literal plain and simple fact and I find it hilarious you want sources when any idiot can write anything and then use it as a source and you would believe it. Facts are facts Fresno is in Northern California. Metallica originated in San Francisco, and the larger 12 county definition is known in vernacular by the census as the Greater San Francisco Bay Area. Deal with it. All you do is revert my edits get a life THE THINGS YOU EDIT YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT BUT BECAUSE YOU FEEL LIKE SOME WIKI VETERAN YOU THINK YOU KNOW EVERYTHING. You know nothing about anything as far as the west coast goes so you need to stop even searching or looking at these articles because they don't effect you. The information is correct and Wikipedia is here for people who don't know about things to know about and all you are doing is incorrectly educating people who look at these pages

October 2014

This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian again, as you did at User talk:Zzyzx11, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Binksternet (talk) 16:52, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Get over yourself

January 2015

Hello, I'm Bentogoa. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Palm Springs, California— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Bentogoa (talk) 11:12, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Palm Springs, California with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Bentogoa (talk) 11:17, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Bentogoa with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Bentogoa (talk) 11:19, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User talk:Bentogoa. Bentogoa (talk) 11:21, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  5 albert square (talk) 11:28, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)