L.schartner

Your submission at Articles for creation: Viennacontemporary (January 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Viennacontemporary and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 21:20, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Viennacontemporary has been accepted

Viennacontemporary, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 03:38, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Christina Steinbrecher-Pfandt image

I agree, the image I found there was mislabeled, that was not CSP, but likely Vita Zaman. Thank you for that, corrected. However, we can't use images of CSP that aren't free for everyone to reuse and edit, like the rest of the Wikipedia. And the photographer will likely be upset. If you can get the photographer to release the image under a free license, such as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ that would be wonderful. But please don't take their work otherwise. --GRuban (talk) 20:25, 14 September 2021 (UTC)