Can we start over? edit

Multiple use of refs edit

Hi. I noticed that you converted a mention of a book in the text of Welsh Sheepdog to multiple in-line refs (this ought to have been done a long time ago – thanks). You may be interested to know that there is a mechanism for multiple uses of the same ref, which I've implemented in the article: see this diff. Doing this avoids repetition in the ref list. You can choose any word for the ref name, as long as it's not already used by another multiple ref on the same page. If the ref name is a single short word you can omit the quotation marks.

For all refs it's usual to give the author first, to put the title of the publication in italics, and to include the name of the publisher (which I've since added in this case), and the page numbers (but I don't have access to that book for those). See WP:Citing sources for more. Regards, Richard New Forest (talk) 08:54, 6 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the tip - I'll do this in future Kunchan (talk) 08:59, 7 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite edit

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 05:02, 20 October 2016 (UTC)Reply