Welcome!

Hello, Knowledge-able1969, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Red Director (talk) 00:10, 20 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Repeated removal of freely-licensed images on the Jamie Kimmett article

edit

  Hello, Knowledge-able1969. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Jamie Kimmett, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Royalbroil 02:41, 21 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

You stated in your edit summary during the second removal of the image: "The artist and his management do not want this picture on Jamie's wikipedia page". That statement expresses your conflict of interest. The image meets all Wikipedia:Image use policy requirements: freely-licensed, taken during a public performance, does not demean/ridicule the subject, etc. I see no reason to remove the image except if it is replaced by a "better" one. If you are indeed close to the subject, then you can follow the OTRS process at Commons to give permission to using an image that Jamie holds copyright to replace this image. Royalbroil 02:41, 21 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

repeated removal of free image from Jamie Kimmett article

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jamie Kimmett. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Royalbroil 14:51, 29 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

I have started a discussion on the article's talk page. Royalbroil 14:51, 29 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

May 2020

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jamie Kimmett. Royalbroil 01:29, 14 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Third and fourth opinions have said that the image should remain. Royalbroil 01:29, 14 May 2020 (UTC)Reply