User talk:Knope7/Archives/2016/December

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Rodw in topic Cleveland Pools GA review

Sally Jewell


Hello, Knope -- You will see that I have completed the copy-edit you requested at Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests. It was an interesting article. Since external links are not normally allowed in the main part of an article, I moved the link of the Women in Conservation Rachel Carson Award to the list of external links at the bottom of the article. However, I wasn't exactly sure how it should look, so you may want to work on that. Perhaps add "Women in Conservation" right before the closing square bracket?  – Corinne (talk) 01:14, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

@Corinne:, thank you for taking the time to copy edit Sally Jewell! I appreciate your time and effort. I am so glad the Guild of Copy Editors exists to offer this valuable help. Knope7 (talk) 18:29, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Collect your prize

Hi, please carefully read the instructions at the bottom of Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon for collecting your prize. I will need you to send me an email, your wiki name, what I owe you and your preference for currency in dollars or pounds/country of residence.♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:42, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

@Redolta: Thank you for the kind message. Merry Christmas to you as well! Knope7 (talk) 04:59, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

January 2017 at Women in Red

 
 


January 2017

Women Philosophers & Women in Education online editathons
Faciliated by Women in Red

 

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 02:13, 29 December 2016 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Cleveland Pools GA review

Thanks for taking on the GA review of Cleveland Pools. I noticed you moved the standard review page to Draft:Cleveland Pools/GA1 and I was wondering if you had found time to take a look at it?— Rod talk 17:36, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

@Rodw: sorry but I changed my mind about the review. The British English/American English differences were more of a barrier than I initially thought. Knope7 (talk) 00:29, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
OK but is it possible to remove the review page you started as, on the list at Wikipedia:Good article nominations#Art and architecture other potential reviewers may think a review is in progress, and therefore not start it. I'm not sure of the best way to do this - would you like me to ask at Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations to see if someone can help?— Rod talk 08:52, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
@Rodw:The review page was never listed on the GA Nomination page so no reviewer would have thought the article was claimed. Still, to be cautious I removed any link to Cleveland Pools and added a statement that the review was abandoned. Knope7 (talk) 17:09, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Because the process was started a bot changes its status at GAN. If you look at Wikipedia:Good article nominations#Art and architecture it says "discuss review" rather than "start review" which indicates it is "in progress". I have seen this problem before when someone has take on a review and then realised, for one reason or another, that they can not complete it. I can't remember how to fix it.— Rod talk 17:23, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
@Rodw: I have tagged the review page for Speedy deletion. I hope that takes care of it. I am sorry for any confusion. Knope7 (talk) 17:46, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
I've put a note at Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations#Reviewer has resigned to ask for help.— Rod talk 17:55, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
@Rodw: the page has already been deleted and the entry on the nominations page says "start review" again. Knope7 (talk) 18:19, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Thanks - now resolved. Sorry for the hassles & if you ever need help with British English let me know.— Rod talk 18:23, 31 December 2016 (UTC)