A kitten for you! edit

 

Thanks!

Abigailwise (talk) 00:45, 22 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Rose Marcario edit

While there is information and sources, it's simply not the notability level we consider sufficient and the sources particularly are too focused as typical business announcements and notices about the business and, since notability cannot be inherited, we would need a wider focus in additional major independent news. SwisterTwister talk 02:01, 2 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

  • Yes it would, and citing them like the other currently formatted sources is acceptable. There's no specific limit as long as it's still significant. SwisterTwister talk 02:15, 2 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • Better but could still benefit from all additional major independent news coverage for the best enhancement. SwisterTwister talk 03:20, 2 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • Yes, any of those can work as long as they're not simply trivial coverage. SwisterTwister talk 03:34, 2 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • Simply adding any of the additional good ones may help and balance the notability weighing. SwisterTwister talk 04:04, 2 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rose Marcario has been accepted edit

 
Rose Marcario, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Megalibrarygirl (talk) 21:04, 4 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Camber Outdoors edit

 

Hello, Klc17. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Camber Outdoors".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 07:25, 24 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Rachel Pohl edit

 

Hello, Klc17. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rachel Pohl".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 08:57, 27 September 2017 (UTC)Reply