Chantilly Union order of battle edit

III Corps was a Corps of the Army of Virginia. It was not one of the Army of Potomac Corps, such as II Corps, which was assigned to the Army of Virginia for the Northern Virginia campaign. After Chantilly when the Army of Virginia was dissolved, III Corps was reassigned to the Army of the Potomac and renumbered to the 'I' Corps. III Corps of the Army of Virginia was different from the III Corps of the Army of the Potomac. As for IX Corps, it doesn't matter since the number didn't change, but at the time it was IX Corp Army of Virginia. C2equalA2plusB2 (talk) 23:16, 18 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Seven Pines Confederate order of battle edit

Aloha. Apparently we have different ideas of formatting. I'll desist, at least temporarily: I was trying to bring a little more conformity among the ANV OB pages. Can you enlighten me as to why serial initials (e.g., "A.P. Hill") require an intervening space? It appears "Hampden (Virginia)" may be confused with "Hampton" elsewhere on the Web. I haven't found the former in Virginia. I realize it COULD be renamed (e.g., New Hampden, Highland County; or Hampden, Mingo County, in what is now West Virginia)--LMK if you know the origin. Hywel Dda (talk) 12:10, 8 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

barnstar edit

Thanks. I have now received two barnstars from people I don't know in two days. Is there some barnstar program underway or something? Hal Jespersen (talk) 16:03, 6 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

  • No barnstar program, i only like your articles. --Kitt1987 (talk) 16:45, 6 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Spotsylvania Court House Confederate order of battle edit

Just in case you want to improve the article, the Manual of Style says headings should not be wikilinked. I already fixed that problem once and you reverted me, and I really don't feel like doing the same work twice, so I wont. Best regards and happy editing. --Muhandes (talk) 15:54, 29 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Same for Wilderness Confederate order of battle. I am removing these from my watchlist. --Muhandes (talk) 08:47, 30 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Original Barnstar
WARNING! APPOMATTOX UNION AND CONFEDERATE ORDER OF BATTLE (REWORK AND FACELIFT) COMPLETED: VERIFY!. SOURCE: OFFICIAL RECORDS.

PLEASE, FOCUS YOUR WORK ON ATLANTA UNION/CONFEDERATE ORDER OF BATTLE. THANK YOU. FDRMRZUSA (talk) 18:05, 2 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Wilderness Union order of battle edit

My amendement are inclused in official order, Why you cancelled? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.227.215.155 (talk) 09:32, 2 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

The Wilderness Union order of battle covers only the period from May 5-7, 1864! Please note that before you change an article! And when you make a change like that, use the footnotes, with citation! Kitt1987 (talk) 07:04, 3 April 2013 (UTC) This is because in the Overland Campaign is not presented an official order of battle of the Overland Campaign! Our amendement are presented in "The civil war archive" section "Union regimental index" RegardsReply

reverted a revision edit

I noticed that you reverted a revision that I recently made to Atlanta Campaign Confederate order of battle‎. I had added a Wikilink to the article on Keys Battery, or the Helena Light Artillery. What was the problem with this edit? Reverting edits with out discussing on the talk page can lead to unproductive disagreements. Aleutian06 (talk) 14:07, 6 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

No problem, thanks for responding! Aleutian06 (talk) 20:38, 6 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Antietam Confederate order of battle edit

What wrong with colonel Edmund N. Atkinson? --Muhranoff (talk) 20:37, 18 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

He is not listed in one of the References. --Kitt1987 (talk) 16:12, 19 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

  • Colonel Edmund N Atkinson, Infantry Unit: 26th Georgia Infantry - "Here Colonel Atkinson received the first of many wounds he would get in the war. It was a severe one".--Muhranoff (talk) 14:31, 20 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • also, see The Maryland Campaign of September 1862, Joseph Pierro ISBN 1135912394, p. 424. --Muhranoff (talk) 14:38, 20 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

9th Pennsylvania Reserves edit

Thank you for your corrections to my edits of the Union orders of battle for both the Wilderness and Spotsylvania Court House. I had two sources which indicated that the 9th Pennsylvania Reserves were ordered to return to Pennsylvania for muster out after both battles. On further investigation, I have found definitive proof that the regiment was ordered home on May 4, 1864:
"On the very day that the campaign was inaugurated, and while standing in the front line in the Wilderness ready for battle, orders were unexpectedly received for the regiment to return to Washington. The term of service had expired, the first of the Reserve regiments, and quitting the field on the 4th of May, it proceeded to Harrisburg, and thence to Pittsburg, where it arrived on the 8th, and on the 13th was mustered out of service."
Thanks for keeping me on my toes. Spacini (talk) 17:41, 9 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Deletion of stuff in various Orders of Battle edit

Hey. I know that you are strict with sources and am fine with it, thought it would be nice if you would occasionally talk to the people or at least leave edit summaries; a few weeks ago you scared away another kid. And could you please be more careful when deleting stuff ? I´m asking because you´ve, several times now, deleted my wikifications from the remaining content as well and this doubles my work there, too. Thanks in advance ... GELongstreet (talk) 07:54, 16 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Kitt1987. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Question edit

Hello Kitt1987! I was wondering why you reverted my edits to Chancellorsville Confederate order of battle that are here: [1]? I intended to point the links to those ranks away from the US Army/generic United States ones, and toward their descriptions within the Confederate Army.Kresock (talk) 04:54, 15 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

  • Hello. The current Military ranks are the standard in every order of battle. That's the reason why reverted the edits. --Kitt1987 (talk) 15:07, 15 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

OK, so the consensus is to retrofit Confederate Army Orders of Battle into today's abbreviations in the US Army, and wiki-links to ranks these men never held in the US Army? Kresock (talk) 15:49, 17 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Seven Days Union Order of Battle edit

Edwin Sumner and Samuel Heintzelman were definitely major generals during the Seven Days; both had been promoted following the Battle of Williamsburg. Both were also wounded by stray musket balls at Glendale, although Sumner did not appear to have suffered any significant injury. Heintzelman however was unable to use one hand for a few weeks. The remaining corps commanders were not promoted to major general until after the Seven Days--William Franklin and Fitz-John Porter received promotions in July 1862, Erasmus Keyes not until March 1863 (although he outranked Franklin and Porter).

70.44.223.30 (talk) 07:29, 15 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Both generals were appointed after the Seven Days on July 16, 1862.

  • Edwin Sumner → appointment 16 July 1862 / Date of rank 05 May 1862 (Eicher, p. 705)
  • Samuel Heintzelman → appointment 16 July 1862 / Date of rank 05 May 1862 (Eicher, p. 703)

References

  • Eicher, John H., and David J. Eicher. Civil War High Commands. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2001. ISBN 0-8047-3641-3.

--Kitt1987 (talk) 14:28, 16 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Disposition of the Reserve Corps artillery edit

The 2nd NY Heavy Artillery/11th NY Light Artillery/1st NY Battery C are listed in most Second Manassas OOBs (for example, Collins's "The Army of the Potomac: Orders of Battle 1861-65) and should be included here. They were however not involved in the main battle. On August 27, Battery C and the 11th NY Light Artillery were chased from Manassas Junction by Fitz Lee's cavalry with a significant amount of prisoners and guns taken. The remaining men withdrew to Centreville where they were reinforced by the 2nd NY Heavy Artillery and the 1st Massachusetts Heavy Artillery. 70.44.223.30 (talk) 12:08, 10 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

That Battle lasted from August 28-30, 1862.

"They were however not involved in the main battle" → That's the reason why they are not include.

--Kitt1987 (talk) 16:30, 10 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Kitt1987. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Kitt1987. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Wilderness Order of Battle edit

May I ask why you are deleting the note on Alexander Hays, please? Hhfjbaker (talk) 16:29, 16 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

If someone wants to learn more about his death he should read the "Alexander Hays" page. It's standard on all OOB's to show only the abbreviations: w = wounded, mw = mortally wounded, k = killed, c = captured

--Kitt1987 (talk) 19:28, 17 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Wilderness Confederate order of battle edit

@Kitt1987: - Yesterday you reverted a Wiki–link for the 15th Alabama Infantry Regiment in Wilderness Confederate order of battle. I don't see any reason for this. Also, I added the regiment's commander and Wiki–linked it too. The source was commented out because the citation system does not appear to be Harvard, however the comment says the source is Rhea page 305. Gordon C. Rhea is the author of the most detailed book on the battle: The Battle of the Wilderness May 5-6, 1864. What's going on? Why are you reverting those edits? TwoScars (talk) 14:55, 16 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Wilderness Confederate Order of Battle edit

I see you've undone the changes made to the Wilderness OOB. I would like to know why it was reverted. The numbers are from a source already referenced on the page (Alfred C. Young III's "Lee's Army During The Overland Campaign: A Numerical Study"). I felt, with the figures given, it would be helpful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThoughtfulPug (talkcontribs) 21:43, 28 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

In the other Order of Battles the numbers of the Troops are also not shown. All the articles should follow the same standards. Kitt1987 (talk) 13:56, 29 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
The reason why other Orders of Battle do not have them is because a.) there isn't any definitive information regarding it, or b.) no one has bothered to include them out of laziness. Alfred C. Young's book with the numbers is listed in the references. Why would you include it in references if you are not going to incorporate the information from that source? 162.247.87.169 (talk) 17:57, 29 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
The articles are about the army organization. If you wanna include the numbers you should start a new chapter → https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlanta_campaign_Confederate_order_of_battle#Strengths Kitt1987 (talk) 14:12, 30 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
I appreciate the suggestion. However, I must say I am not entirely familiar with how to create a table such as that. If you mind helping me with it, I would appreciate. ThoughtfulPug (talk) 18:55, 30 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
I added the table withe the numbers → https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilderness_Confederate_order_of_battle#Strengths Kitt1987 (talk) 17:16, 1 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
I cannot thank you enough. I'll see if I can add in similar tables for Spotsylvania and Cold Harbor OOBs. ThoughtfulPug (talk) 20:14, 4 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
Yes of course. If you need help just let me know. Kitt1987 (talk) 13:42, 5 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

undoing my edit for no reason edit

I asked you once to explain why when rv-ing my edit so I don't have to rv it back but you haven't done so.

The edit was to fix a missing end tag Linter error, why would you undo it for no reason? Sheep (talk) 16:04, 3 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wilderness Confederate order of battle edit

Can you please explain why you removed the information I added to Wilderness Confederate order of battle. I asked why you did so and you simply reverted my edit again without an edit summary. That was obviously discourteous. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 16:09, 27 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply