King Arthur6687
Nanoha edit
Ah, didn't know that. Sorry. =X P.S. I'd be the guy with the IP of "63.199.105.122", forgot to login. Sorry on that regard too.
No worries. Admittedly the editors' comments are hard to spot sometimes, and it's hard to read an entire article before rolling up the sleeves and fixing stuff ;) Magus Melchior 06:24, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
Nice Work! edit
Thank you for killing that repetition of doom.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 08:11, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
- Always happy to. =) King Arthur6687 (talk) 08:15, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Setsuna F. Seiei edit
How exactly does the information I added to Setsuna`s article "strays off topic"? The only thing I did was correct a very poorly written article. "Setsuna spends most of his time with Lockon" - this is stupid. He doesn`t and you know why? Because Lockon (at least Neil) is dead! The tenses are wrong, the writing style is poor and the article is confusing (e.g.,Tieria finding common grounding with Setsuna in their mutual dislike for Team Trinity coming before explaining how and why Setsuna dislikes them. Unless you can provide a good explaination for your reverts, I`m going to change the article again and if you have an qualms with that I suggest you contact the moderators or take whatever actions you see fit. I shall do the same in case you revert my changes. I`ll assume the airing of the first episode of the second season as the time limit for your reply. -- Ishikawa Minoru (talk) 11:48, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
- What you wrote down was more about actions taken by Setsuna in the course of the anime. The header was typed out as "Personality", thus, the section should concern more on Setsuna's habits, relationship with other people, and so forth. Actions, which still can be used to describe his personality, should not become the main focus as that is not the main subject. "Saving X person at the last moment" is an action and does not describe at all someone's personality as it only describes the literal action and does not delve into describing the thinking Setsuna does behind the scenes. King Arthur6687 (talk) 22:32, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
- The effects of having been saved by those Gundams are obvious. Setsuna is obsessed with the Gundams because he considers the O Gundam, in a sense, some sort of Messiah. Nena, though, different from his idealized imagine of what a Gundam Meister should act like.
- Other than that, you cannot say that Tieria got along better with Setsuna before both dislike the Thrones before even addressing Setsuna`s views on the pilots. It doesn`t make sense. As such, I cannot allow this article to remain as it is.
- Moreover, Tieria, at some point (after Veda is hacked) also thinks he`s not worthy of being a Meister so, saying "...all Gundam Meisters but himself" isn`t even correct. -- Ishikawa Minoru (talk) 00:58, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
- "The effects of having been saved by those Gundams are obvious. Setsuna is obsessed with the Gundams because he considers the O Gundam, in a sense, some sort of Messiah."
- That assumption itself is flawed. Setsuna views all Gundams, not just the O Gundam, as a savior. As you put it, a messiah. Furthermore, this is made clear in the first paragraph in a more (appropriately) general term. To state it again later on, in addition to naming Gundams, is redundant and not accurate.
- "Other than that, you cannot say that Tieria got along better with Setsuna before both dislike the Thrones before even addressing Setsuna`s views on the pilots. It doesn`t make sense. As such, I cannot allow this article to remain as it is."
- It was not stated like you said before you editted the article. The section did not comment on Tieria having improved his relationship with fellow meisters BEFORE the mutual disapproval of the Thrones.
- Moreover, Tieria, at some point (after Veda is hacked) also thinks he`s not worthy of being a Meister so, saying "...all Gundam Meisters but himself" isn`t even correct.
- An overly descriptive clarification of this does not belong under Setsuna's "Personality" profile. This is more a description of Tieria's personality, not Setsuna's. Plus, Tieria quickly recovered from this soonafter if I recall correctly. I am deviating from our discussion, though.
- Overall, your edits are redundant, strays from the point of the section, and does little to clarify Setsuna's personality. I am reverting your edit, again. Please bring a third-party, preferably knowledgable on Gundam 00, if you feel this should be contested more. King Arthur6687 (talk) 01:35, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
00 Mobile Suit Merger Proposal edit
From what I can tell, you seem to be involved with the pages for the individual as well as list pages for the 00 mobile suits. I was planing a merger for the 4 mentioned articles and was wondering, if you had anything to say about it. Tempest115 (talk) 18:16, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit
Hello, King Arthur6687. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit
Hello, King Arthur6687. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit
| | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)