Airfield rubber removal edit

You deleted a link to my company's web page from the Airfield rubber removal page, and I was wondering if you had taken the time to see if there was actually useful information on this site that could be linked to or if you just saw .com and decided to delete it. I realize now that as an employee of a company that does runway cleaning, I should leave the decision of external linking to our pages up to an impartial individual. I plan to add a video of Runway rubber removal to our website and I look forward to having someone else link that to the wikipedia page. The goal of our website has always been content driven with hopes of promoting and entire industry. I am learning the rules of wikipedia as well as it's intent. I would appreciate your feedback. Thanks Kinetiscope (talk) 13:57, 25 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Your site is a good site information and explanation wise, I admit, and a lot of what's in the site may fit into the Wikipedia article well. I seem to recall hesitating somewhat before getting rid of the link, but in the end it is still a commercial site primarily in existence to promote the availability of your company's services. Regards, Mannafredo (talk) 16:23, 25 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Shredded-membrane-hydrocleaning.jpg edit

 

The file File:Shredded-membrane-hydrocleaning.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 7 April 2020 (UTC)Reply