User talk:Kathleen.wright5/Archive 3

GREETINGS

WISH YOU A HAPPY NEW YEAR!--BobClive (talk) 08:18, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Environmental Chemistry cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Environmental Chemistry cover.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:15, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Image417.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Image417.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:09, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Vwc2008mascot.jpg}

Thank you for uploading File:Vwc2008mascot.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 22:33, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Re:MFD

That's a weird one - but I've found out the cause. The clue was that the message was down by the userboxes. looks like Wikipedia:Intensive Care Unit/UBX - one of the userboxes you've got on that section - has been nominated for deletion, and that's where the message is coming from. Your page is safe :) Grutness...wha? 23:20, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

The nominator had used the wrong MfD message template when the userbox was nominated. Hopefully it's fixed now. Grutness...wha? 23:24, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Re:Billy Sneddon.jpg

"What links here" is your friend :) WP:FFD has only recently changed its name from WP:Images for deletion, and there's still some teething problems. That particular FFD IFD was never closed, but it was a pretty clear-cut "keep", so I'll close it (once I've worked out how - I don't deal with IFD/FFD very often). Grutness...wha? 05:46, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Screenshots categories

Why are you tagging images that are not screenshots of Windows Vista, with Category:Screenshots of Windows Vista? You're making extra work for me, reviewing every edit you've made and correcting these mistakes. Please endeavor to be more careful... thanks. Warren -talk- 15:35, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Furthermore, by adding screenshots of non-free software to categories, you are inadvertently creating galleries in the category articles themselves. This is explicitly against Wikipedia's image use policy (see WP:NFCC #9). To avoid this, you need to add "__NOGALLERY__" to every category article for which you are adding non-free images. It would be better still to create new categories specifically for screenshots, so that they can be found by navigating the image categories. Thanks. Warren -talk- 15:42, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

The intolerable heat of Perth Wa has brought out a very bad sense of hmour in relation to anything at the moment - so please ignore user page fiddling - but thanks for pointing out the clock error - i may well go back and fix it some time - but when it cooler - cheers SatuSuro 13:15, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

wikiproject Serbian Orthodox Church

thanks for link. I started voting. Can you chach have i done it on apropriate way?--Vojvodaeist 10:48, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Serbian Orthodox Church isn't new religiouss movement. It was constitute in 1219 by Saint Sava. Since than it has long and interesting (for me) history and of course present.--Vojvodaeist 13:35, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

I saw mistake and I will fix it.--Vojvodaeist 07:01, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

spam blacklist

Yes, I did get your reply, thank you.

I think it was added because of excessive spam: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam/2007_Archive_Aug#webtv-club.com_tv-cb.com. If you think the link should be added, see MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist, where it could be whitelisted.

I don't have a lot of experience with the spam blacklist, and if this isn't the reply you were looking for, you my want to try talking to Lustiger seth. Spencer^T♦C 20:33, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Re: Amanda Blair.jpg

Hi! Thank you for correction :) I didn't know that when I added this photo to the article. Regards, Patrol110 (talk) 15:14, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

I'm Welcomed!!

Thank you very much. I am please to be on Christianity Wiki. I am glad that there is something out there that is what I believe.--God'sGirl94 (talk) 12:06, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

thank you. I have an account there now!! --God'sGirl94 (talk) 17:17, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Cyrillic

For what it's worth, it looks like a stub someone had tried to write about the biochemist Tikhol Michailov Stoyanov Antov, possibly in Bulgarian rather than Russian. Unfortunately my Russian isn't up to working out exactly what it was all about, and my Bulgarian is non-existent - but it looks like the editor who put it there had also tried to create it as a stub before (see The_acaunt_"_Biochemist_T.M.S.Antov). Grutness...wha? 01:19, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Category Changes/Deletions

Hi, I appreciate your contributions to several articles in the Christian Film category recently. However, I've undone your revisions, as these articles ( Left Behind, etc.) are under the scope of Christian Films Task Force. Our task force uses the information in Category:Christian Films to create our worklists, and removing the articles from the mentioned category hinders our work. You may not realize it, but changing categorization on these articles to Category:Films Released by Cloud Ten Pictures could also easily be viewed as over-categorization and quite possible even as an attempt at advertising. I don't believe this was your intent at all. Please let me know if you have any questions about why I've made these revisions! God Bless, --Filmcom (talk) 23:00, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Television images?

I saw the edits you did for the Celebrate Freedom 2007 images stating that they were Christian television images. How can they be television if they were taken from a cell phone camera? Would it be for the fact that the images taken were about the television station itself? Please advise. Chris (talk) 17:12, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

WFSH-FM is about a radio station though. Would this be classified as Christian radio station image? Chris (talk) 20:05, 25 October 2009 (UTC)