Karmak

RE: 1980s reference

Please reconsider the source of information you have decided to use for the Beverly Hills High School article's Academics section. Deriving a conclusion from a 1980s analytic observance of the school may be highly inaccurate, as times and cultural demographics have gone through a significant change.

We should also question the accuracy of the website's copy of the excerpt of the book, as the owner of the website could have misplaced, and thereby distorting the context of the excerpt's meaning.CH1 01:45, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Yes, but later I got the library book...

---

A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Case name, and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible.

This mediation request was delisted before I had a chance to see it. I suspect that Gunbolt is the same person as "The MAN" and the same person who has been vandalizing the Beverly Hills High School article just to personally insult me!

Somehow this person doesn't want to believe that there are wealthy students at Beverly Hills High School, which is very bizarre! It is no secret that wealthy people connected to the entertainment industry live in Beverly Hills and have children who go to the high school!Karmak

Info removed from BHHS Trivia

Some editor has been removing the Munitz trivia. Why should that be censored?

I personally did not remove this. Perhaps someone thought that something that cannot be documented shuld not be in the article. But I can't be sure.Karmak

Beverly Hills High School

Hey man, I've blocked User:The MAN for 3 hours for personal attacks, incivility, and that thing he pulled with your user page. If you have any further trouble, feel free to contact me. - FrancisTyers · 19:30, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Your comment on my user page

What are you on about? I've avoided that article for about a month because your "contributions" to it are so hopeless and aggravating. I don't know why you left a message on my page about it. It was probably meant for someone else. Moncrief 22:54, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

I left a message on your page because I wanted to. Simple! Karmak

Your contributions

Please do not start an editing war on Beverly Hills High School. AS seen on your contribution list, you have historically been known to revert attempts by other users who are trying to correct the Beverly Hills High School article.

There is, for me, no outstanding problem with you in regards to this article. I've edited the new section because it does not fit the bill of Wikipedia. CH1 02:19, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

As you may have noticed, people revert YOUR edits, not mine! You, (with 100 usernames) have been the only person to revert what I write!Karmak

BHHS

I've semiprotected the article and banned CH1 for 24 hours for personal attacks. The other users you mention have been banned by Will Beback I think. - FrancisTyers · 20:04, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for you help! Karmak

Re:Hellwing

I didn't accuse Hellwing of being a sockpuppet, I simply said the chances of people participating in AfD with such a low edit count increases the chances of them being one. I was assuming good faith, if you have evidence of him being a sockpuppet though, you should post it at WP:SSP. As for "sharing all my info about him" I don't have any info other than that he participated in an AfD I was involved in. If you suspect he is a sock you might want to look at the people who voted in the first AfD of the article and see if you think there is any connection between him and one of the people who voted in that. VegaDark 20:12, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Last Man

Hey could you add where Nietzsche stated a connection between the last man and the underground man to the article.1 Thanks LoveMonkey 03:28, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)