Kandisky123
You are in violation of Wikipedia's 3 revert rules (WP:3R) and spam rules. You are at risk of being blocked for your continued edits on stencil. Please choose instead to be helpful. --Knulclunk 18:19, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Insertion of links to promotional websites - August 2007 edit
This is your last warning.
The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing anyone from linking to them from any site that uses the MediaWiki spam blacklist, which includes all of Wikimedia and Wikipedia. These links were also added to articles and/or image captions in Faux Painting, Interior decoration, Refinishing, Distressing and Marbleizing. You were warned previously on August 7, 2007 about reinserting the same spam link to articles, as you did during previous editing sessions for the article Stencil. Links and/references to external sources that promote or advertise companies that sell merchandise and services are subject to removal by any editor. Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:External links, Wikipedia:SPAM, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not for additional background information. In particular, please review Wikipedia:Business' FAQ and Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) for further information regarding promotion and marketing activities by commercial interests. →Lwalt ♦ talk 08:16, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
File:Sch owdp 3.jpg listed for deletion edit
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sch owdp 3.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Wgunther (talk) 21:49, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
File:Sch owdp 3.jpg missing description details edit
is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:55, 11 August 2013 (UTC)Possibly unfree File:Sch owdp 3.jpg edit
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sch owdp 3.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Renata (talk) 23:51, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
The file File:Sch ewf 2.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Orphaned file, no foreseeable encyclopedic use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:00, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
The file File:Sch ewf 8.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
The file File:Sch tl 1.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
The file File:Damask.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
The article Color wash has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unsourced, not a notable topic, nonsensical claims like "It was historically created with oil-based products because of the long drying time,.." hint: no it wasn't.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vexations (talk) 22:53, 15 September 2021 (UTC)