January 2021 edit

 

Hello Kakyoin95. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Dewesoft, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Kakyoin95. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Kakyoin95|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:53, 13 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

February 2021 edit

 

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Kakyoin95, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Kakyoin95|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Pahunkat (talk) 20:31, 9 February 2021 (UTC)Reply


Hello! Thank you for your notice! I somehow missed the previous one for which I apologize... I am not being compensated for my edits. I am interested in data acquisition technology in general and I would like to contribute more about it. In this next year, I am planning on writing some more about DAQ in general, technologies, and companies included in this topic. Hopefully, I will be able to do it. Best Regards --Kakyoin95 (talk) 06:47, 24 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dewesoft (July 7) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:15, 7 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Kakyoin95! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:15, 7 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: DewesoftX (July 7) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 14:16, 7 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dewesoft (July 23) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 09:37, 23 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Thank you for your feedback! I have removed all self-pulished sources! BR Kakyoin95 (talk) 09:35, 28 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Dewesoft has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Dewesoft. Thanks! Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 12:30, 28 July 2021 (UTC)Reply


Hi! Thank you for your comment! Since this is my first time getting that kind of comment, could you help me by telling me where to write those three references? Do I write it here or do I need some special form for it? Thank you again! --Kakyoin95 (talk) 18:17, 30 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dewesoft (July 28) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Tamingimpala were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Tame (talk) 17:04, 28 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of List of data acquisition companies edit

 

The article List of data acquisition companies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is WP:NOT a directory, and despite the claim in the header that this is a list of notable companies, most of the list entries are not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MrOllie (talk) 17:16, 28 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dewesoft (November 11) edit

 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by TTP1233 was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
Jyoti Roy (talk) 11:08, 11 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:DewesoftX edit

  Hello, Kakyoin95. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:DewesoftX, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 7 December 2021 (UTC)Reply